CLC number: TU023
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2017-08-15
Cited: 0
Clicked: 5408
Xiao-qing Zhu, Jian-tao Weng, Yi-qun Wu, Wei-jun Gao, Zhu Wang. Wind suitability in site analysis of coastal concave terrains using computational fluid dynamics simulation: a case study in East Asia[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2017, 18(9): 741-756.
@article{title="Wind suitability in site analysis of coastal concave terrains using computational fluid dynamics simulation: a case study in East Asia",
author="Xiao-qing Zhu, Jian-tao Weng, Yi-qun Wu, Wei-jun Gao, Zhu Wang",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="18",
number="9",
pages="741-756",
year="2017",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A1600313"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Wind suitability in site analysis of coastal concave terrains using computational fluid dynamics simulation: a case study in East Asia
%A Xiao-qing Zhu
%A Jian-tao Weng
%A Yi-qun Wu
%A Wei-jun Gao
%A Zhu Wang
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 18
%N 9
%P 741-756
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2017
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1600313
TY - JOUR
T1 - Wind suitability in site analysis of coastal concave terrains using computational fluid dynamics simulation: a case study in East Asia
A1 - Xiao-qing Zhu
A1 - Jian-tao Weng
A1 - Yi-qun Wu
A1 - Wei-jun Gao
A1 - Zhu Wang
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 18
IS - 9
SP - 741
EP - 756
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2017
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A1600313
Abstract: The effect of wind environment is becoming increasingly important in analyzing and selecting sites for better natural ventilation of residential buildings, external comfort, and pollution dispersion. The main purpose of this study was to develop a set of methods for wind environment assessment in coastal concave terrains. This set of methods can be used to provide quantifiable indicators of preferable wind conditions and help site analysis. Firstly, a total of 20 types of coastal bays with concave terrains in east Asia were characterized to find ideal locations. The selected areas were divided into five categories according to the main terrain features. Then a sample database for the concave terrains was compiled for modelling comparisons. Secondly, a number of key wind variables were identified. computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of the typical coastal concave terrains identified as a result of the study were created, and the local wind environments were simulated with input from geographic information system (GIS) and statistic package for social science (SPSS) analysis. A measure of wind suitability was proposed that takes wind velocity and wind direction into account using GIS. Finally, SPSS was used to find the relationship between wind suitability and key terrain factors. The results showed that wind suitability was significantly associated with terrain factors, especially altitude. The results suggest that residential building sites should be selected such that their bay openings face the direction of the prevailing wind and that the opposite direction should be avoided.
The topic of the paper is of great interest for wind studies, because wind over topography is very difficult to predict, both via numerical and experimental models.
[1]Bowen, A.J., Hong, C., 1992. The measurement and interpretation of peak-gust wind-speeds over an isolated hill. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 41(1-3):381-392.
[2]Bullard, J.E., Wiggs, G.F.S., Nash, D.J., 2000. Experimental study of wind directional variability in the vicinity of a model valley. Geomorphology, 35(1-2):127-143.
[3]Castro, F.A., Palma, J.M.L.M., Lopes, A.S., 2003. Simulation of the Askervein Flow. Part 1: Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations (kturbulence model). Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 107(3):501-530.
[4]Cheng, X.L., Fei, H.U., 2006. The study of grid formation on complex terrain. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 23(3):313-316 (in Chinese).
[5]Chock, G.Y.K., Cochran, L., 2005. Modeling of topographic wind speed effects in Hawaii. Journal of Wind Engineering, 93(8):623-638.
[6]Dai, N., Miura, O., 1997. Soil disturbance regime in relation to micro-scale landforms and its effects on vegetation structure in a hilly area in Japan. Plant Ecology, 133(2):191-200.
[7]Hu, C.H., Wang, F., 2005. Using a CFD approach for the study of street-level winds in a built-up area. Building & Environment, 40(5):617-631.
[8]Kubota, T., Miura, M., Tominaga, Y., et al., 2008. Wind tunnel tests on the relationship between building density and pedestrian-level wind velocity: development of guidelines for realizing acceptable wind environment in residential neighborhoods. Building & Environment, 43(10):1699-1708.
[9]Kumar, S., Bansal, V.K., 2016. A GIS-based methodology for safe site selection of a building in a hilly region. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(1):39-51.
[10]Latinopoulos, D., Kechagia, K., 2015. A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for wind farm site selection. A regional scale application in Greece. Renewable Energy, 78:550-560.
[11]Launder, B.E., Sharma, B.I., 1974. Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc. Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer, 1(2):131-137.
[12]Lei, L.I., Chan, P.W., Yang, L., et al., 2013. Study on numerical simulation of wind field around buildings over complex terrain. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 6(10):77-81 (in Chinese).
[13]Li, W., Wang, F., Bell, S., 2007. Simulating the sheltering effects of windbreaks in urban outdoor open space. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95(7):533-549.
[14]Liu, D., Zhao, F.Y., Tang, G.F., 2010. Non-unique convection in a three-dimensional slot-vented cavity with opposed jets. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 53(5-6):1044-1056.
[15]Mak, M.Y., Ng, S.T., 2005. The art and science of Feng Shui—a study on architects’ perception. Building and Environment, 40(3):427-434.
[16]McAuliffe, B.R., Larose, G.L., 2012. Reynolds-number and surface-modeling sensitivities for experimental simulation of flow over complex topography. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 104-106(3):603-613.
[17]Meaden, G.T., Kochev, S., Kolendowicz, L., et al., 2007. Comparing the theoretical versions of the Beaufort scale, the T-scale and the Fujita scale. Atmospheric Research, 83(2-4):446-449.
[18]Mellor, G.L., Yamada, T., 1982. Development of a turbulent closure model for geo-physical fluid problems. Reviews of Geophysics, 20(4):851-875.
[19]MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development), 2014. Evaluation Standards of Green Building, GB/T 50378-2014. National Standards of People’s Republic of China (in Chinese).
[20]Murakami, S., Deguchi, K., 1981. New criteria for wind effects on pedestrians. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 7(3):289-309.
[21]Murakami, S., Iwasa, Y., Morikawa, Y., 1986. Study on acceptable criteria for assessing wind environment at ground level based on residents’ diaries. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 24(1):1-18.
[22]Noorollahi, Y., Yousefi, H., Mohammadi, M., 2016. Multi-criteria decision support system for wind farm site selection using GIS. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 13:38-50.
[23]Penwarden, A.D., 1973. Acceptable wind speeds in towns. Building Science, 8(3):259-267.
[24]Ramponi, R., Blocken, B., Coo, L.B.D., et al., 2015. CFD simulation of outdoor ventilation of generic urban configurations with different urban densities and equal and unequal street widths. Building and Environment, 92: 152-166.
[25]Simiu, E., Scanlan, R.H., 1978. Wind Effects on Structures: an Introduction to Wind Engineering. John Wiley, USA.
[26]Sugimura, T., Takahashi, K., Iida, M., 2009. Numerical wind analysis on complex topography using multiscale simulation model. The seventh International Conference on Urban Climate.
[27]Szűcs, Á., 2013. Wind comfort in a public urban space–case study within Dublin Docklands. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2(1):50-66.
[28]Takahashi, T., Ohtsu, T., Yassin, M.F., et al., 2002. Turbulence characteristics of wind over a hill with a rough surface. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 90(12-15):1697-1706.
[29]Takahashi, T., Kato, S., Murakami, S., et al., 2005. Wind tunnel tests of effects of atmospheric stability on turbulent flow over a three-dimensional hill. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 93(2):155-169.
[30]Tamura, T., 1969. A series of micro-landform units composing valley-heads in the hills near Sendai. Control Theory & Applications IEE Proceedings D, 127(4):177-187.
[31]Tamura, T., 1983. Multiscale landform classification on study in the hills of Japan: Part III application of the multiscale landform classification system to environmental geomorphological studies in the hills. The Science Reports of the Tohoku University, 33(2):79-103.
[32]Tang, L., Nikolopoulou, M., Zhao, F.Y., et al., 2012. CFD modeling of the built environment in Chinese historic settlements. Energy and Buildings, 55(12):601-606.
[33]Taylor, P.A., Walmsley, J.L., Salmon, J.R., 1986. Guidelines and models for estimating wind speeds at WECS sites in complex terrain. Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial Congress of the International Solar Energy Society, 4:2009-2014.
[34]Vuorinen, V., Chaudhari, A., Keskinen, J.P., 2015. Large-eddy simulation in a complex hill terrain enabled by a compact fractional step OpenFOAM® solver. Advances in Engineering Software, 79:70-80.
[35]Weng, W., Taylor, P.A., Walmsley, J.J., 2000. Guidelines for airflow over complex terrain: model developments. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 86(2-3):169-186.
[36]Wise, A.F.E., Richards, D.J.W., 1971. Effects due to groups of buildings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 269(1199):469-485.
[37]Yan, B.W., Li, Q.S., 2016. Coupled on-site measurement/CFD based approach for high-resolution wind resource assessment over complex terrains. Energy Conversion and Management, 117:351-366.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>