CLC number: R573.9
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2017-07-19
Cited: 0
Clicked: 5291
Yu Zhang, Zhen Wang, Ting Jin, Kai-qiang Li, Ke Hao, Wei Zhang, Bao-ying Fei. Hyperechoic demarcation line between a tumor and the muscularis propria layer as a marker for deciding the endoscopic treatment of gastric submucosal tumor[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2017, 18(8): 707-716.
@article{title="Hyperechoic demarcation line between a tumor and the muscularis propria layer as a marker for deciding the endoscopic treatment of gastric submucosal tumor",
author="Yu Zhang, Zhen Wang, Ting Jin, Kai-qiang Li, Ke Hao, Wei Zhang, Bao-ying Fei",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="18",
number="8",
pages="707-716",
year="2017",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B1600256"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Hyperechoic demarcation line between a tumor and the muscularis propria layer as a marker for deciding the endoscopic treatment of gastric submucosal tumor
%A Yu Zhang
%A Zhen Wang
%A Ting Jin
%A Kai-qiang Li
%A Ke Hao
%A Wei Zhang
%A Bao-ying Fei
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 18
%N 8
%P 707-716
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2017
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B1600256
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hyperechoic demarcation line between a tumor and the muscularis propria layer as a marker for deciding the endoscopic treatment of gastric submucosal tumor
A1 - Yu Zhang
A1 - Zhen Wang
A1 - Ting Jin
A1 - Kai-qiang Li
A1 - Ke Hao
A1 - Wei Zhang
A1 - Bao-ying Fei
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 18
IS - 8
SP - 707
EP - 716
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2017
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B1600256
Abstract: Minimally invasive endoscopic resection has been rapidly adopted as a new technique for treating patients with gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating in the muscularis propria (MP) layer. This study was conducted to evaluate the information obtained from endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to determine the appropriate endoscopic dissection method for treating SMTs originating in the MP layer. Between February 2014 and May 2016, a total of 50 patients with gastric SMTs originating in the MP layer were enrolled in this study. The clinical features of the patients and their endoscopic, EUS, and histopathologic findings, as well as their postoperative follow-up data, were analyzed in this retrospective study. The mean age of the patients was (55.0±10.2) years, and the male/female ratio was 17:33. endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed on 43 patients and an endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR) was performed on seven patients. The most frequent location for an SMT was in the upper body region of the stomach (n=16), and the most common pathological diagnosis was a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (n=32). The overall rates for complete resection were 95.3% (41/43) and 100.0% (7/7) when the SMTs were treated by ESD and EFR, respectively. The presence of a complete tumor capsule was significantly associated with a complete resection (P=0.001). Of the cases treated by ESD, nine patients developed perforation, one of whom required laparoscopic surgery. The remaining patients were closed with clips or purse-string sutures. The presence of an MP2-type tumor (P=0.018) and a wide connection with the MP layer (P=0.044) were significantly associated with perforation. A preoperative evaluation of the integrity and the location of a tumor capsule and the length of the tumor connection with the MP layer by EUS can improve the complete resection rate and reduce the occurrence of intraoperative complications. Tumors with a complete capsule originating from the superficial MP layer or with a narrow connection with the MP layer are appropriate candidates for treatment by ESD.
[1]Bialek, A., Wiechowska-Kozlowska, A., Pertkiewicz, J., et al., 2012. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of gastric subepithelial tumors (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc., 75(2):276-286.
[2]Brand, B., Oesterhelweg, L., Binmoeller, K.F., et al., 2002. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound for evaluation of submucosal lesions in gastrointestinal tract. Dig. Liver Dis., 34(4):290-297.
[3]Chak, A., 2002. EUS in submucosal tumors. Gastrointest. Endosc., 56(4 Suppl.):S43-S48.
[4]Chun, S.Y., Kim, K.O., Park, D.S., et al., 2013. Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric subepithelial tumors that originate from the muscularis propria layer: a preliminary analysis of appropriate indications. Surg. Endosc., 27(9):3271-3279.
[5]Edge, S.B., Compton, C.C., 2010. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 17(6):1471-1474.
[6]Hedenbro, J.L., Ekelund, M., Wetterberg, P., 1991. Endoscopic diagnosis of submucosal gastric lesions. The results after routine endoscopy. Surg. Endosc., 5(1):20-23.
[7]Hobel, S., Baumbach, R., Dautel, P., et al., 2014. Single centre experience of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in premalignant and malignant gastrointestinal neoplasia. Z. Gastroenterol., 52(2):193-199.
[8]Hwang, J.H., Rulyak, S.D., Kimmey, M.B., 2006. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology, 130(7):2217-2228.
[9]Jeon, S.W., Jung, M.K., Kim, S.K., et al., 2010. Clinical outcomes for perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric lesions. Surg. Endosc., 24(4):911-916.
[10]Kwee, R.M., Kwee, T.C., 2007. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review. J. Clin. Oncol., 25(15):2107-2116.
[11]Lee, I.L., Lin, P.Y., Tung, S.Y., et al., 2006. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of intraluminal gastric subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Endoscopy, 38(10):1024-1028.
[12]Meng, F.S., Zhang, Z.H., Shan, G.D., et al., 2015. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of large gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a single center study. Z. Gastroenterol., 53(7):655-659.
[13]Mocellin, S., Marchet, A., Nitti, D., 2011. EUS for the staging of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc., 73(6):1122-1134.
[14]Nishimura, J., Nakajima, K., Omori, T., 2007. Surgical strategy for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: laparoscopic vs. open resection. Surg. Endosc., 21(6):875-878.
[15]Park, Y.S., Park, S.W., Kim, T.I., et al., 2004. Endoscopic enucleation of upper-GI submucosal tumors by using an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife. Gastrointest. Endosc., 59(3):409-415.
[16]Polkowski, M., Palucki, J., Wronska, E., et al., 2004. Endosonography versus helical computed tomography for locoregional staging of gastric cancer. Endoscopy, 36(7):617-623.
[17]Probst, A., Golger, D., Arnholdt, H., et al., 2009. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early cancers, flat adenomas, and submucosal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 7(2):149-155.
[18]Ryu, K.J., Jung, S.R., Choi, J.S., et al., 2011. Laparoscopic resection of small gastric submucosal tumors. Surg. Endosc., 25(1):271-277.
[19]Shi, Q., Zhong, Y.S., Yao, L.Q., et al., 2011. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Gastrointest. Endosc., 74(6):1194-1200.
[20]von Schonfeld, J., 2009. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Z. Gastroenterol., 47(12):1264-1266.
[21]Ye, L.P., Yu, Z., Mao, X.L., et al., 2014. Endoscopic full-thickness resection with defect closure using clips and an endoloop for gastric subepithelial tumors arising from the muscularis propria. Surg. Endosc., 28(6):1978-1983.
[22]Zhang, Y., Zhou, P., Xu, M., et al., 2011. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of gastric glomus tumors. Gastrointest. Endosc., 73(2):371-375.
[23]Zhou, P.H., Yao, L.Q., Qin, X.Y., et al., 2011. Endoscopic full-thickness resection without laparoscopic assistance for gastric submucosal tumors originated from the muscularis propria. Surg. Endosc., 25(9):2926-2931.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>