Abstract: The frequency of online psychotherapy, including pure online (PO: videoconference [PO-VC], telephone [PO-TEL], asynchronous therapist-guided [PO-Async]), or blended (BLD) modalities, has grown exponentially, yet how the therapeutic alliance (TA), a key outcome predictor, compares across these formats and face-to-face (FTF) treatment remains unclear. To compare the TA strength and the TA‒outcome association across FTF, PO, and BLD modalities, a systematic narrative review (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses/Synthesis Without Meta-analysis [PRISMA/SWiM]) was performed by searching PubMed, PsycARTICLES, and Web of Science. Studies were deemed eligible if they quantitatively compared TA across at least two modalities in adults with depressive or anxiety disorders. PO arms were classified as telepsychotherapy (PO-VC/TEL) or therapist-guided digital interventions (PO-Async). The findings were synthesized by direction and consistency. Nine studies, including three primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six secondary analyses, were finally included in this study. TA strength was broadly comparable across all three modalities. One study found significantly lower patient-rated working alliance inventory (WAI) scores at Week 2 in PO-Async versus FTF, resolving by Week 8. The TA‒outcome association was mixed, varying by modality, rater perspective, and timepoint. The results showed that TA was broadly equivalent across FTF, PO, and BLD formats, although asynchronous PO might show a transient week-2 lag. The TA‒outcome association was less consistent in PO/BLD than in FTF. As a preliminary hypothesis, digital delivery may shift the functional emphasis of the alliance from affective bonding toward task/goal engagement.

不同治疗媒介下的治疗联盟：面对面、在线与混合式心理治疗中联盟强度及结局预测作用的系统叙述性综述

[1]Aafjes-van Doorn K, Spina DS, Horne SJ, et al., 2024. The association between quality of therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes in teletherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev, 110:102430.

[2]Andersson G, Carlbring P, Titov N, et al., 2019. Internet interventions for adults with anxiety and mood disorders: a narrative umbrella review of recent meta-analyses. Can J Psychiatry, 64(7):465-470.

[3]Askjer S, Mathiasen K, 2021. The working alliance in blended versus face-to-face cognitive therapy for depression: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv, 25:100404.

[4]Axelsson E, Hedman-Lagerlöf E, 2025. Associations between treatment credibility, patient expectancies, working alliance and symptom trajectory in cognitive behaviour therapy for pathological health anxiety. Psychol Psychother, 98(3):779-798.

[5]Barceló-Soler A, García-Campayo J, Araya R, et al., 2023. Working alliance in low-intensity internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in primary care in Spain: a qualitative study. Front Psychol, 14:1024966.

[6]Berger T, Krieger T, Sude K, et al., 2018. Evaluating an e-mental health program (“deprexis”) as adjunctive treatment tool in psychotherapy for depression: results of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord, 227:455-462.

[7]Bordin ES, 1979. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychother Theory Res Pract, 16(3):252-260.

[8]Bormann NL, Stoppel CJ, Arndt S, et al., 2024. Patient perceived impact of outpatient group substance use disorder treatment in a hybrid model or virtual-only model relative to in-person delivery. Subst Abuse Rehabil, 15:223-232.

[9]Bouchard S, Allard M, Robillard G, et al., 2020. Videoconferencing psychotherapy for panic disorder and agoraphobia: outcome and treatment processes from a non-randomized non-inferiority trial. Front Psychol, 11:2164.

[10]Branquinho M, Canavarro MC, Fonseca A, 2024. Blended CBT intervention vs. a guided web-based intervention for postpartum depression: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Psychol Psychother, 31(6):e70007.

[11]Daft RL, Lengel RH, 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manage Sci, 32(5):554-571.

[12]del Re AC, Flückiger C, Horvath AO, et al., 2012. Therapist effects in the therapeutic alliance‒outcome relationship: a restricted-maximum likelihood meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev, 32(7):642-649.

[13]Etzelmueller A, Radkovsky A, Hannig W, et al., 2018. Patient’s experience with blended video- and internet based cognitive behavioural therapy service in routine care. Internet Interv, 12:165-175.

[14]Flückiger C, del Re AC, Wampold BE, et al., 2018. The alliance in adult psychotherapy: a meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4):316-340.

[15]Gómez Penedo JM, Babl AM, Grosse Holtforth M, et al., 2020. The association of therapeutic alliance with long-term outcome in a guided internet intervention for depression: secondary analysis from a randomized control trial. J Med Internet Res, 22(3):e15824.

[16]Hadjistavropoulos HD, Pugh NE, Hesser H, et al., 2017. Therapeutic alliance in internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for depression or generalized anxiety. Clin Psychol Psychother, 24(2):451-461.

[17]Horvath AO, del Re AC, Flückiger C, et al., 2011. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1):9-16.

[18]Igra L, Lavidor M, Atzil-Slonim D, et al., 2020. A meta-analysis of client-therapist perspectives on the therapeutic alliance: examining the moderating role of type of measurement and diagnosis. Eur Psychiatry, 63(1):e67.

[19]Kooistra L, Ruwaard J, Wiersma J, et al., 2020. Working alliance in blended versus face-to-face cognitive behavioral treatment for patients with depression in specialized mental health care. J Clin Med, 9(2):347.

[20]Mathiasen K, Andersen TE, Lichtenstein MB, et al., 2022. The clinical effectiveness of blended cognitive behavioral therapy compared with face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for adult depression: randomized controlled noninferiority trial. J Med Internet Res, 24(9):e36577.

[21]Mercadal Rotger J, Cabré V, 2022. Therapeutic alliance in online and face-to-face psychological treatment: comparative study. JMIR Ment Health, 9(5):e36775.

[22]Norwood C, Moghaddam NG, Malins S, et al., 2018. Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: a systematic review and noninferiority meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Psychother, 25(6):797-808.

[23]Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al., 2006. Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme, Version 1, Lancaster University.

[24]Romijn G, Batelaan N, Koning J, et al., 2021. Acceptability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of blended cognitive-behavioural therapy (bCBT) versus face-to-face CBT (ftfCBT) for anxiety disorders in specialised mental health care: a 15-week randomised controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. PLoS One, 16(11):e0259493.

[25]Sextl-Plötz T, Titzler I, Schmidt-Hantke J, et al., 2025. Patients’ perspectives on implementing fixed and flexible variants of blended therapy in routine care: a qualitative study of the project PSYCHOnlineTHERAPY. Digit Health, 11:20552076251377943.

[26]Shirk SR, Gudmundsen G, Kaplinski HC, et al., 2008. Alliance and outcome in cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent depression. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol, 37(3):631-639.

[27]Short J, Williams E, Christie B, 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley, London, UK.

[28]Simpson SG, Reid CL, 2014. Therapeutic alliance in videoconferencing psychotherapy: a review. Aust J Rural Health, 22(6):280-299.

[29]Stiles-Shields C, Kwasny MJ, Cai X, et al., 2014. Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol, 82(2):349-354.

[30]Swartz HA, Bylsma LM, Fournier JC, et al., 2023. Randomized trial of brief interpersonal psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression delivered both in-person and by telehealth. J Affect Disord, 333:543-552.

[31]Swift JK, Callahan JL, 2009. The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol, 65(4):368-381.

[32]Swift JK, Callahan JL, Cooper M, et al., 2018. The impact of accommodating client preference in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol, 74(11):1924-1937.

[33]Tishby O, Wiseman H, 2022. Countertransference types and their relation to rupture and repair in the alliance. Psychother Res, 32(1):16-31.

[34]Titzler I, Saruhanjan K, Berking M, et al., 2018. Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of blended psychotherapy for depression: a qualitative pilot study of therapists’ perspective. Internet Interv, 12:150-164.

[35]van Lotringen CM, Jeken L, Westerhof GJ, et al., 2021. Responsible relations: a systematic scoping review of the therapeutic alliance in text-based digital psychotherapy. Front Digit Health, 3:689750.

[36]van Seters MLFM, Rasing SPA, Huvenaars MJ, et al., 2024. The therapeutic alliance in blended versus face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents and young adults with a depressive disorder. Internet Interv, 38:100776.

[37]Vernmark K, Hesser H, Topooco N, et al., 2019. Working alliance as a predictor of change in depression during blended cognitive behaviour therapy. Cogn Behav Ther, 48(4):285-299.

[38]Wade SL, Raj SP, Moscato EL, et al., 2019. Clinician perspectives delivering telehealth interventions to children/families impacted by pediatric traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol, 64(3):298-306.

[39]Wallin EEK, Mattsson S, Olsson EMG, 2016. The preference for internet-based psychological interventions by individuals without past or current use of mental health treatment delivered online: a survey study with mixed-methods analysis. JMIR Ment Health, 3(2):e25.

[40]Windle E, Tee H, Sabitova A, et al., 2020. Association of patient treatment preference with dropout and clinical outcomes in adult psychosocial mental health interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry, 77(3):294-302.

[41]Zagorscak P, Heinrich M, Schulze J, et al., 2020. Factors contributing to symptom change in standardized and individualized internet-based interventions for depression: a randomized-controlled trial. Psychotherapy, 57(2):237-251.

Similar articles