CLC number: Q189
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 2
Clicked: 5291
CAO Li-ren, SU Hao, CAO Zhen-fu. A study on sampling strategies in the figure cognitive process[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2004, 5(9): 1160-1164.
@article{title="A study on sampling strategies in the figure cognitive process",
author="CAO Li-ren, SU Hao, CAO Zhen-fu",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="5",
number="9",
pages="1160-1164",
year="2004",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2004.1160"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T A study on sampling strategies in the figure cognitive process
%A CAO Li-ren
%A SU Hao
%A CAO Zhen-fu
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 5
%N 9
%P 1160-1164
%@ 1869-1951
%D 2004
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2004.1160
TY - JOUR
T1 - A study on sampling strategies in the figure cognitive process
A1 - CAO Li-ren
A1 - SU Hao
A1 - CAO Zhen-fu
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 5
IS - 9
SP - 1160
EP - 1164
%@ 1869-1951
Y1 - 2004
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2004.1160
Abstract: This study was aimed at investigating the sampling strategies for 2 types of figures: 3-D cubes and human faces. The research was focused on: (a) from where the sampling process started; (b) in what order the figures’ features were sampled. The study consisted of 2 experiments: (a) sampling strategies for 3-D cubes; (b) sampling strategies for human faces. The results showed that: (a), for 3-D cubes, the first sampling was mostly located at the outline parts, rarely at the center part; while for human faces, the first sampling was mostly located at the hair and outline parts, rarely at the mouth or cheek parts, in most cases, the first sampling-position had no significant effects on cognitive performance and that (b), the sampling order, both for 3-D cubes and for human faces, was determined by the degree of difference among the sampled-features.
[1] Baylis, G.C., Cale, E.M., 2001. The figure has a shape, but the ground does not: evidence from a priming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27:633-643.
[2] Busy, T.A., Loftus, G.R., 1994. Sensory and cognitive components of visual information acquisition. Psychological Review, 101(3):446-469.
[3] Guez, J.E., Marchal, P., Gargasson, J., Grall, Y., O’Regan, J., 1994. Eye fixations near corners: evidence for a center gravity calculation based on contrast rather than luminance or curvature. Vision Research, 34:1625-1635.
[4] Lindsay, P.H., Norman, D.A., 1977. Human Information Processing: A Introduction to Psychology, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York, p.102-135.
[5] Marr, D., 1982. Vision. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
[6] Massaro, D.W., Cowan, N., 1993. Information processing models: microscope of the mind. Annual Rev. Psychology, 44:383-425.
[7] Selfridge, O.G., Neisser, U., 1960. Pattern recognition by machine. Scientific American, 203:60-68.
[8] Shibuya, H., Bundesen, C., 1988. Visual selection from multielement displays: measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14:591-600.
[9] Townsend, J.T., Hu, G.G., Ashby, F.G., 1980. A test of visual feature sampling independence with orthogonal straight lines. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 15:163-166.
[10] Vecera, S.P., O’Reilly, R.C., 2000. Graded effects in hierarchical figure-ground organization: reply to Petson. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26:1221-1231.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>