Similar articles

Abstract: Maintaining genetic diversity is a major issue in conservation biology. In this study, we demonstrate the differences of genetic diversity levels between wild and captive individuals of Elliot’s Pheasant Syrmaticus ellioti. Wild individuals showed a higher genetic diversity level than that of the captive individuals. Nucleotide diversity and haplotype diversity of wild individuals were 0.00628 and 0.993, while those of captive individuals were 0.00150 and 0.584 respectively. Only 3 haplotypes of mtDNA control region sequence were identified among 36 captive individuals, while 16 unique haplotypes were identified among the 17 wild individuals in this study. One captive haplotype was shared by a wild individual from Anhui Province. It is concluded that a low number of founders was the likely reason for the lower level genetic diversity of the captive group. Careful genetic management is suggested for captive populations, particularly of such an endangered species, to maintain genetic variability levels.

[1] Avise, J., 1994. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.

[2] Baker, A.J., Marshall, H.D., 1997. Mitochondrial Control Region Sequences as Tools for Understanding Evolution. In: Midell, D.P. (Ed.), Avian Molecula Evolution and Systematics. Academic Press, San Diego, California, p.51-79.

[3] Ding, P., Jiang, S.R., 2000. Fragmentation study of Elliot’s Pheasant in the west of Zhejiang Province. Chinese Zoology Reseach, 21(1):65-69 (in Chinese).

[4] Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Briscoe, D.A., 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambrige University Press, UK.

[5] Fuller, R.A., Garson, P.J., 2000. Pheasants. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000-04. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, and the World Pheasant Association, Reading, UK.

[6] Kimura, M., 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleaotide sequence. J. Mol. Evd., 16:111-120.

[7] Knoder, C.E., 1983. Elliot’s Pheasant conservation. World Pheasant Assoc. J., 8:11-28.

[8] Kumar, B., Tamura, K., Jakobsen, I.B., Nei, M., 2001. MEGA2: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Software. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

[9] Randi, E., Lucchini, V., 1998. Organization and evolution of the mitochondrial DNA control region in the avian Genus Alectoris. J. Mol. Evol., 47:449-462.

[10] Rozas, J., Rozas, R., 1999. DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics, 15:174-175.

[11] Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., Maniatis, T., 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.

[12] Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., Higgins, D.G., 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 24:4876-4882.

[13] Zheng, G.M., Wang, Q.S., 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Aves. Science Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).