CLC number: P43
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2016-02-19
Cited: 2
Clicked: 4501
Manuela Sauer, Thomas Hauf, Ludmila Sakiew, Pak Wai Chan, Shuk-Mei Tse, Patrick Hupe. On the identification of weather avoidance routes in the terminal maneuvering area of Hong Kong International Airport[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2016, 17(3): 171-185.
@article{title="On the identification of weather avoidance routes in the terminal maneuvering area of Hong Kong International Airport",
author="Manuela Sauer, Thomas Hauf, Ludmila Sakiew, Pak Wai Chan, Shuk-Mei Tse, Patrick Hupe",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="17",
number="3",
pages="171-185",
year="2016",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A1500186"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T On the identification of weather avoidance routes in the terminal maneuvering area of Hong Kong International Airport
%A Manuela Sauer
%A Thomas Hauf
%A Ludmila Sakiew
%A Pak Wai Chan
%A Shuk-Mei Tse
%A Patrick Hupe
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 17
%N 3
%P 171-185
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2016
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1500186
TY - JOUR
T1 - On the identification of weather avoidance routes in the terminal maneuvering area of Hong Kong International Airport
A1 - Manuela Sauer
A1 - Thomas Hauf
A1 - Ludmila Sakiew
A1 - Pak Wai Chan
A1 - Shuk-Mei Tse
A1 - Patrick Hupe
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 17
IS - 3
SP - 171
EP - 185
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2016
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A1500186
Abstract: The safety and efficiency of air traffic are significantly affected by adverse weather. This holds especially in terminal maneuvering areas () where, in addition to the impact of weather itself, potential weather avoidance routes are strongly restricted by air traffic regulations. A weather avoidance model DIVMET has been developed which proposes a route through a field of developing thunderstorms. Air traffic control regulations have not been included in it at this stage. DIVMET was applied to the of hong Kong International Airport as air traffic control (ATC) there has become interested in improving the controller’s work load, especially for managing incoming traffic by avoidance route simulations. Although visual inspection of simulated avoidance routes by ATC was satisfactory, a quantitative validation of simulated with real observed routes was also carried out. Two real adverse weather situations with thunderstorms within the of hong Kong and with heavily distorted traffic were chosen. The main objective prior to any validation, however, was to identify routes which are solely impacted by weather but do not show any signs of regulation. Route selection was done on the base of flight position data. Landing flights were selected and deviations from standard approach routes were analyzed. As a result, the majority of 272 flights were found to be affected by both weather and regulations (60%), highlighting the challenge for air traffic controllers to manage landing traffic under adverse weather conditions safely and efficiently. Only a few weather-affected flights (7%) were not regulated and could be used for validation. DIVMET simulation routes were presented to local air traffic controllers who confirmed them as potential and realistic avoidance routes. DIVMET weather avoidance route simulations within a appear to be helpful but further model development has to incorporate traffic regulations, to include holdings, short-cuts, and slow-downs.
This paper has been well written to bring up the importance of weather information to minimize the delay of aircraft arrivals especially near HKIA. It is very well organized to understand how the study has been done. This paper tries to focus on how the adverse weather can give an impact to operate and manage the schedule of aircraft arrivals to HKIA as well as how this impact can be reduced by updating the optimized flight trajectory to pilot. To do that, the DEVMET model is adapted to integrate the radar reflectivity information dynamically into the aircraft maneuvering or trajectory modeling procedures. I think that the reader can easily see the motivation, background, some histories for this study in the introduction section. And, the pin-point of the results has been well resolved in the table 1 with the combinations of several figures for case study.
[1]Airport Council International, 2012. 2011 World Airport Traffic Report. . Available from http://issuu.com/aciworld/docs/2011_aci_world_airport_traffic_report_table_of_con/1e=0 [Accessed on Sept. 26, 2013].
[2]Chan, W.N., Refai, M., DeLaura, R., 2007. An approach to verify a model for translating convective weather information to Air Traffic Management impact. 7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, Belfast, Northern Ireland. AIAA, Reston, VA, USA.
[3]Civil Aviation Department Hong Kong, 2011. Aeronautical Information Publication Hong Kong–Area Chart AD2-87. Valid: 30 June 2011.
[4]DeArmon, J., Baden, W., Bateman, H., 2013. An assessment of flight delay caused by enroute weather. 32nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, East Syracuse, USA, p.1C6/1-1C6/9.
[5]DeLaura, R.A., Evans, J.E., 2006a. An exploratory study of modeling enroute pilot convective storm flight deviation behavior. Project Report NASA/A-6, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA, USA.
[6]DeLaura, R.A., Evans, J.E., 2006b. An exploratory study of modeling enroute pilot convective storm flight deviation behavior. 86th Annual Meeting, 12th Conference on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
[7]Erzberger, H., Lauderdale, T., Chu, Y., 2010. Automated Conflict Resolution, Arrival Management and Weather Avoidance for ATM. 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Nice, France.
[8]FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), 1983. Thunderstorms. Advisory Circular No. 00-24B. FAA, Washington DC, USA.
[9]FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), 2010. Weather-related Aviation Accident Study 2003–2007. Technical Note, FAA, Washington DC, USA.
[10]Hauf, T., Sakiew, L., Sauer, M., 2013. Adverse weather diversion model DIVMET. Journal of Aerospace Operations, 2(3-4):115-133.
[11]Hong Kong International Airport, 2013. 15 Years of Growth. Annual Report 2012/13. Hong Kong International Airport, Hong Kong, China.
[12]Hong Kong Observatory, 2011. The Year’s Weather–2011. Hong Kong Observatory. Available from http://www.hko.gov.hk/wxinfo/pastwx/ywx2011.htm [Accessed on Sept. 11, 2014].
[13]Hupe, P., Hauf, T., Rokitansky, C.H., 2014. Case study of adverse weather avoidance modelling. 4th SESAR Innovation Days, Madrid, Spain. SESAR Joint Undertaking, Brussels, Belgium.
[14]Kim, J.H., Chan, W.N., Sridhar, B., et al., 2015. Combined winds and turbulence prediction system for automated air-traffic management applications. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 54:766-784.
[15]Krozel, J., Mitchell, J.S.B., Polishchuk, V., et al., 2007. Maximum flow rates for capacity estimation in level flight with convective weather constraints. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 15(3):209-238.
[16]Lauderdale, T., Erzberger, H., 2013. Automated separation assurance with weather and uncertainty. ENRI International Workshop on ATM/CNS, Tokyo, Japan, p.35-47.
[17]Li, P.W., 2009. Development of a thunderstorm nowcasting system in support of air traffic management. 89th Annual Meeting, Aviation, Range and Aerospace Meteorology Special Symposium on Weather-Air Traffic Management Integration, Phoenix, USA.
[18]McNally, D., Sheth, K., Gong, C., et al., 2012. Dynamic weather routes: a weather avoidance system for near-term trajectory-based operations. 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Brisbane Australia. ICAS, Bonn, Germany.
[19]McNally, D., Sheth, K., Gong, C., et al., 2015. Dynamic weather routes: two years of operational testing at American airlines. 11th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM2015), Lisbon, Portugal.
[20]NATS, 2010. The effect of thunderstorms and associated turbulence on aircraft operations. Technical Note AIC: P 056/2010, UK Aeronautical Information Service, Hounslow, Middlesex.
[21]Rhoda, D., Pawlak, M., 1999. An assessment of thunderstorm penetrations and deviations by commercial aircraft in the terminal area. Project Report NASA/A-2, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA, USA.
[22]Rokitansky, C.H., 2005. VDL mode 2 capacity analysis through simulations: WP3.B–NAVSIM Overview and Validation Results, Edition 1.2. Eurocontrol, Brussels, Belgium.
[23]Rokitansky, C.H., Ehammer, M., Gräupl, T., 2007. NEWSKY –Novel simulation concepts for future air traffic. 1st CEAS European Air and Space Conference, Berlin, Germany. CEAS, Brussels, Belgium, p.611-618.
[24]Sauer, M., Hauf, T., Forster, C., 2014. Uncertainty analysis of thunderstorm nowcasts for utilization in aircraft routing. 4th SESAR Innovation Days, Madrid, Spain. SESAR Joint Undertaking, Brussels, Belgium.
[25]Sharman, R., Krozel, J., Klimenko, V., 2011. Analysis of clear-air turbulence avoidance maneuvers. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 15(2):147-168.
[26]Song, L., Wanke, C., Greenbaum, D., 2006. Predicting sector capacity for TFM decision support. 6th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, Wichita, Kansas. AIAA, Reston, VA, USA.
[27]Song, L., Wanke, C., Greenbaum, D., et al., 2007. Predicting sector capacity under severe weather impact for traffic flow management. 7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, Belfast, Northern Ireland. AIAA, Reston, VA, USA.
[28]Thales Avionics, 2010. FLYSAFE–WP 6.7.3. D6.7-3 Public-Final Publishable Report, Thales, Paris, France.
[29]Yeung, H.Y., 2012. Recent developments and applications of the SWIRLS nowcasting system in Hong Kong. 3rd International Symposium on Nowcasting and Very Short-range Forecasting, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. , Geneva, Switzerland.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>