Full Text:
<1816>
CLC number:
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2019-04-19
Cited: 0
Clicked: 4130
ResearchGate, an effective way to improve the academic dissemination for highly cited researchers?
| ||||||||||||||
Qing Ye, Han-mei Hong. ResearchGate, an effective way to improve the academic dissemination for highly cited researchers?[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2019, 20(5): 375-379.
@article{title="ResearchGate, an effective way to improve the academic dissemination for highly cited researchers?",
author="Qing Ye, Han-mei Hong",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="20",
number="5",
pages="375-379",
year="2019",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A1900140"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T ResearchGate, an effective way to improve the academic dissemination for highly cited researchers?
%A Qing Ye
%A Han-mei Hong
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 20
%N 5
%P 375-379
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2019
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1900140
TY - JOUR
T1 - ResearchGate, an effective way to improve the academic dissemination for highly cited researchers?
A1 - Qing Ye
A1 - Han-mei Hong
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 20
IS - 5
SP - 375
EP - 379
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2019
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A1900140
Abstract: academic dissemination and communication play a great role in promoting scientific progress. Traditionally, most researchers disseminated their work through journal articles, books, and conference presentations. With the development of the Web 2.0, the emergence of social websites, such as Facebook, Twitter, Wechat, provides an alternative way to help researchers presenting their current work, opening views, personal skills, and expertise; meanwhile, followers can get the updated information by following their interested researchers. Although social websites were not very popular among researchers, researchers using social media could obtain several benefits, especially for the ability to communicate quickly.
[1]Ali MY, Richardson J, 2017. Pakistani LIS scholars’ altmetrics in ResearchGate. Program, 51(2):152-169.
[2]Chakraborty N, 2012. Activities and reasons for using social networking sites by research scholars in Nehu: a study on Facebook and ResearchGate. 8th Convention PLANNER 2012.
[3]El-Berry DK, 2015. Awareness and use of academic social networking sites by the academic staff at the South Valley University in Egypt. Journal of Library and Information Sciences, 3(2):115-132.
[4]Elsayed AM, 2016. The use of academic social networks among Arab researchers: a survey. Social Science Computer Review, 34(3):378-391.
[5]Manca S, 2018. ResearchGate and Academia.edu as networked socio-technical systems for scholarly communication: a literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 26:EJ1173547.
[6]Mas-Bleda A, Thelwall M, Kousha K, et al., 2014. Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? Scientometrics, 101(1):337-356.
[7]Nández G, Borrego A, 2013. Use of social networks for academic purposes: a case study. The Electronic Library, 31(6):781-791.
[8]Nicholas D, Herman E, Jamali HR, 2015. Emerging Reputation Mechanisms for Scholars. Technical Report, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Luxembourg.
[9]Rowlands I, Nicholas D, Russell B, et al., 2011. Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3):183-195.
[10]van Noorden R, 2014. Online collaboration: scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513):126-129.
[11]Yu MC, Wu YCJ, Alhalabi W, et al., 2016. ResearchGate: an effective altmetric indicator for active researchers? Computers in Human Behavior, 55:1001-1006.
ORCID: 
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>