Similar articles

Abstract: In this study, an explicit dynamic constitutive model was established for ultra high toughness cementitious composites (UHTCCs). The model, based on the holmquist–;johnson–;cook (HJC) model, includes tensile and compressive damage evolution, hydrostatic pressure, strain rate, and the Lode angle effect. The proposed model was embedded in LS-DYNA software and then comprehensive tests were carried on a hexahedral brick element formulation under uniaxial, biaxial, and triaxial stress states to verify its rationality through comparisons with results determined by the HJC and Karagozian & Case (K&C) models. Finally, the proposed model was used to simulate the damage caused to UHTCC targets subjected to blast by embedded explosive and projectile penetration, and predictions were compared with corresponding experimental results. The results of the numerical simulations showed that our proposed model was more accurate than the HJC model in predicting the size of the crater, penetration depth, and the distribution of cracks inside the target following the blast or high-speed impact loading.

超高韧性水泥基复合材料动态本构关系

[1]Béton CEID, 1993. CEB-FIP Model Code 1990: Design Code. Thomas Telford, London, UK.

[2]Cheng YF, 2014. Detonation Mechanism and Explosion Property of High-energy Emulsion Explosives Based on Hydrogen Storage Material. PhD Thesis, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China (in Chinese).

[3]Gebbeken N, Ruppert M, 2000. A new material model for concrete in high-dynamic hydrocode simulations. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 70(7):463-478.

[4]Hartmann T, Pietzsch A, Gebbeken N, 2010. A hydrocode material model for concrete. International Journal of Protective Structures, 1(4):443-468.

[5]Holmquist TJ, Johnson GR, Cook WH, 1993. A computational constitutive model for concrete subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high pressures. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Ballistics, p.591-600.

[6]Johnson GR, Cook WH, 1983. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperature. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, p.541-547.

[7]Khan MZN, Hao YF, Hao H, et al., 2018. Mechanical properties of ambient cured high-strength plain and hybrid fiber reinforced geopolymer composites from triaxial compressive tests. Construction and Building Materials, 185: 338-353.

[8]Kong XZ, Fang Q, Wu H, et al., 2016. Numerical predictions of cratering and scabbing in concrete slabs subjected to projectile impact using a modified version of HJC material model. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 95:61-71.

[9]Lai JZ, Zhu YY, Tan JM, 2016. Experiment and simulation of ultra-high performance concrete subjected to blast by embedded explosive. Engineering Mechanics, 33(5):193-199 (in Chinese).

[10]Li HD, Xu S, 2011. Determination of energy consumption in the fracture plane of ultra high toughness cementitious composite with direct tension test. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 78(9):1895-1905.

[11]Li HD, Xu SL, 2016. Rate dependence of ultra high toughness cementitious composite under direct tension. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 17(6):417-426.

[12]Li HY, Shi GY, 2016. A dynamic material model for rock materials under conditions of high confining pressures and high strain rates. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 89:38-48.

[13]Li QH, Zhao X, Xu SL, et al., 2016a. Influence of steel fiber on dynamic compressive behavior of hybrid fiber ultra high toughness cementitious composites at different strain rates. Construction and Building Materials, 125:490-500.

[14]Li QH, Huang BT, Zhou BM, et al., 2016b. Study on compression fatigue properties of ultra high toughness cementitious composites. Journal of Building Structures, 37(1):135-142 (in Chinese).

[15]Li Y, Liang XW, Liu ZJ, 2010. Behavior of high performance PVA fiber reinforced cement composites in triaxial compression. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 32(17):179-185.

[16]Lin XS, 2018. Numerical simulation of blast responses of ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete panels with strain-rate effect. Construction and Building Materials, 176:371-382.

[17]Liu W, 2012. Experimental study on dynamic mechanical properties of ultra-high toughness cementitious composites. PhD Thesis, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China (in Chinese).

[18]Liu Y, Ma AE, Huang FL, 2009. Numerical simulations of oblique-angle penetration by deformable projectiles into concrete targets. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36(3):438-446.

[19]LSTC (Livermore Software Technology Corporation), 2012. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, Volume I, Version 971. LSTC, Livermore, USA.

[20]Malvar LJ, Crawford JE, Wesevich JW, et al., 1997. A plasticity concrete material model for DYNA3D. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 19(9-10):847-873.

[21]Mechtcherine V, Silva FDA, Butler M, et al., 2011. Behaviour of strain-hardening cement-based composites under high strain rates. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 9(1):51-62.

[22]Murray YD, 2007. User’s Manual for LS-DYNA Concrete Material Model 159. Report No. FHWA-HRT-05-062, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, USA.

[23]Pan JL, He JX, Wang LP, 2016. Experimental study on mechanical behaviors and failure criterion of engineered cementitious composites under biaxial compression. Engineering Mechanics, 33(6):186-193 (in Chinese).

[24]Polanco-Loria M, Hopperstad OS, Børvik T, et al., 2008. Numerical predictions of ballistic limits for concrete slabs using a modified version of the HJC concrete model. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 35(5):290-303.

[25]Ranade R, Li VC, Heard WF, 2015. Tensile rate effects in high strength-high ductility concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 68:94-104.

[26]Reinhardt HW, Cornelissen HAW, Hordijk DA, 1986. Tensile tests and failure analysis of concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 112(11):2462-2477.

[27]Ren GM, Wu H, Fang Q, et al., 2016. Triaxial compressive behavior of UHPCC and applications in the projectile impact analyses. Construction and Building Materials, 113:1-14.

[28]Riedel W, Thoma K, Hiermaier S, et al., 1999. Penetration of reinforced concrete by BETA-B-500 numerical analysis using a new macroscopic concrete model for hydrocodes. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on the Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures, p.315.

[29]Schuler H, Mayrhofer C, Thoma K, 2006. Spall experiments for the measurement of the tensile strength and fracture energy of concrete at high strain rates. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 32(10):1635-1650.

[30]Soe KT, Zhang YX, Zhang LC, 2013. Impact resistance of hybrid-fiber engineered cementitious composite panels. Composite Structures, 104:320-330.

[31]Tu ZG, Lu Y, 2009. Evaluation of typical concrete material models used in hydrocodes for high dynamic response simulations. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36(1):132-146.

[32]Wang SS, Le HTN, Poh LH, et al., 2016. Resistance of high-performance fiber-reinforced cement composites against high-velocity projectile impact. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 95:89-104.

[33]Weerheijm J, van Doormaal JCAM, 2007. Tensile failure of concrete at high loading rates: new test data on strength and fracture energy from instrumented spalling tests. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 34(3):609-626.

[34]Wen CG, 2015. Study on Mechanical Performance of Engineering Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites PVA-ECC. MS Thesis, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China (in Chinese).

[35]Willam KJ, Warnke EP, 1975. Constitutive model for the triaxial behavior of concrete. Proceedings of International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, p.174.

[36]Xu H, Wen HM, 2013. Semi-empirical equations for the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 60:76-81.

[37]Xu H, Wen HM, 2016. A computational constitutive model for concrete subjected to dynamic loadings. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 91:116-125.

[38]Xu SL, Cai XR, 2008. Basic mechanical properties of ultra high toughness cementitious composite. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 39(S2):1055-1063 (in Chinese).

[39]Xu SL, Li QH, 2010. Basic Application of Ultra High Toughness Cementitious Composites in Advanced Engineering Structures. Science Press, Beijing, China, p.5-6 (in Chinese).

[40]Xu SL, Chen C, Li QH, et al., 2019. Numerical simulation on dynamic compressive behavior of ultra-high toughness cementitious-composites. Engineering Mechanics, 36(9):50-59 (in Chinese).

[41]Yang EH, Li VC, 2014. Strain-rate effects on the tensile behavior of strain-hardening cementitious composites. Construction and Building Materials, 52:96-104.

[42]Zhao X, 2018. Experimental and Theoretical Study on the Dynamic Properties of Ultra High Toughness Cementitious. PhD Thesis, University of Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China (in Chinese).

[43]Zhou JJ, Pan JL, Leung CKY, et al., 2013. Experimental study on mechanical behaviors of pseudo-ductile cementitious composites under biaxial compression. Science China Technological Sciences, 56(4):963-969.