Similar articles

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to determine a suitable modeling method to make computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation more efficient for aeroacoustics optimization of the bogie region of high-speed trains. To this end, four modeling methods are considered, which involve different geometry simplifications and boundary condition specifications. The corresponding models are named the three-car marshalling model, computational domain shortening model, carbody shortening model, and sub-domain model. Combining the detached eddy simulation (DES) model and Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) equation, the unsteady flow field and far-field noise of the four models are predicted. To evaluate the effect of the different modeling methods, the time-averaged flow field, fluctuating flow field, and far-field noise results of the four models are compared and analyzed in detail with the results of the three-car marshalling model used as basis for comparison. The results show that the flow field results of the bogie region predicted by the four models have relatively high consistency. However, the usage of the non-time varying outlet boundary conditions in the computational domain shortening model and sub-domain model could affect the pressure fluctuation on the upstream carbody surface. When only the bogie region is used as the source surface, the differences between the far-field noise results of the three simplified models and the three-car marshalling model are all within 1 dB; when the train head is used as the source surface, the results of the carbody shortening model and the three-car marshalling model are more consistent.

几何简化和边界条件指定对高速列车车头和转向架区域流场和气动噪声的影响

[1]BellJR, BurtonD, ThompsonMC, et al., 2017. A wind-tunnel methodology for assessing the slipstream of high-speed trains. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 166:1-19.

[2]ChangC, LiT, QinD, et al., 2022. On the scale size of the aerodynamic characteristics of a high-speed train. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 15(1):209-219.

[3]DingSS, LiQ, TianAQ, et al., 2016. Aerodynamic design on high-speed trains. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 32(2):215-232.

[4]DongTY, LiangXF, KrajnovićS, et al., 2019. Effects of simplifying train bogies on surrounding flow and aerodynamic forces. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 191:170-182.

[5]FarassatF, 2007. Derivation of Formulations 1 and 1A of Farassat. Technical Report No. NASA/TM-2007-214853, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, USA.

[6]GaoY, LiQL, WangYG, 2017. Analysis method of aerodynamic noise of full scale high speed train head shape. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 38(3):30-35 (in Chinese).

[7]GuoZJ, LiuTH, ChenZW, et al., 2020. Aerodynamic influences of bogie’s geometric complexity on high-speed trains under crosswind. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 196:104053.

[8]KarbonKJ, DietschiUD, 2005. Computational analysis and design to minimize vehicle roof rack wind noise. Journal of Passenger Car: Mechanical Systems Journal, 114(6):649-656.

[9]KhierW, BreuerM, DurstF, 2000. Flow structure around trains under side wind conditions: a numerical study. Computers & Fluids, 29(2):179-195.

[10]KimH, HuZW, ThompsonD, 2020. Numerical investigation of the effect of cavity flow on high speed train pantograph aerodynamic noise. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 201:104159.

[11]LauterbachA, EhrenfriedK, LooseS, et al., 2012. Microphone array wind tunnel measurements of Reynolds number effects in high-speed train aeroacoustics. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 11(3-4):411-446.

[12]LiT, DaiZY, ZhangWH, 2020a. Effect of RANS model on the aerodynamic characteristics of a train in crosswinds using DDES. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 122(2):555-570.

[13]LiT, QinD, ZhangWH, et al., 2020b. Study on the aerodynamic noise characteristics of high-speed pantographs with different strip spacings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 202:104191.

[14]LiZM, LiQL, YangZG, 2022. Flow structure and far-field noise of high-speed train under ballast track. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 220:104858.

[15]LiuJL, ZhangJY, ZhangWH, 2011. Numerical analysis on aerodynamic noise of the high-speed train head. Journal of the China Railway Society, 33(9):19-26 (in Chinese).

[16]MeskineM, PérotF, KimMS, et al., 2013. Community noise prediction of digital high speed train using LBM. The 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference.

[17]MinelliG, YaoHD, AnderssonN, et al., 2020. An aeroacoustic study of the flow surrounding the front of a simplified ICE3 high-speed train model. Applied Acoustics, 160:107125.

[18]PlentovichEB, Stallings JrRL, TracyMB, 1993. Experimental Cavity Pressure Measurements at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds. Technical Report No. NASA-TP-3358, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, USA.

[19]SchellA, EiseltM, 2020. Numerical investigation of tonal noise at automotive side mirrors due to aeroacoustic feedback. The 11th International Styrian Noise, Vibration & Harshness Congress: the European Automotive Noise Conference.

[20]ShiJW, ZhangJY, 2024. Effect of bogie cavity end wall inclination on flow field and aerodynamic noise in the bogie region of high-speed trains. CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 139(2):2175-2195.

[21]ShiJW, ZhangJY, LiT, 2024. Aerodynamic noise reduction of high-speed pantograph by introducing planar jet on leeward surface of panhead. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 250:105780.

[22]ShurML, SpalartPR, StreletsMK, et al., 2008. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 29(6):1638-1649.

[23]softwareSiemens PLM, 2017. STAR-CCM+User Guide (Version 12.04). Siemens.

[24]SpalartPR, DeckS, ShurML, et al., 2006. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 20(3):181-195.

[25]ThompsonDJ, 2008. Railway Noise and Vibration: Mechanisms, Modelling and Means of Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

[26]ThompsonDJ, IglesiasEL, LiuXW, et al., 2015. Recent developments in the prediction and control of aerodynamic noise from high-speed trains. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 3(3):119-150.

[27]WangJB, MinelliG, DongTY, et al., 2020. Impact of the bogies and cavities on the aerodynamic behaviour of a high-speed train. An IDDES study. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 207:104406.

[28]WilliamsJEF, HawkingsDL, 1969. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 264(1151):341-342.

[29]YaoHD, ChroneerZ, DavidsonL, 2018. Simplifications applied to simulation of turbulence induced by a side view mirror of a full-scale truck using DES. WCX World Congress Experience.

[30]ZhaoYY, YangZG, LiQL, et al., 2020. Analysis of the near-field and far-field sound pressure generated by high-speed trains pantograph system. Applied Acoustics, 169:107506.

[31]ZhuJY, 2015. Aerodynamic Noise of High-Speed Train Bogies. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

[32]ZhuJY, HuZW, 2017. Flow between the train underbody and trackbed around the bogie area and its impact on ballast flight. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 166:20-28.