Similar articles

Abstract: The concrete-filled corrugated steel tubular (CFCST) column is a novel steel–concrete composite column characterized by transverse corrugated steel plates. This unique application of the plates leverages their considerable out-of-plane stiffness, markedly enhancing the compression performance of CFCST columns while significantly reducing steel material consumption. However, the exact confinement mechanism of the corrugated steel on the infilled concrete remains unclear. To address this question, we analyzed the confinement effect of the CFCST columns under axial compression. The lateral displacement, lateral stress, and bending moment distributions were determined through differential equations, and parametric analysis was performed to examine the impact of varying corrugated steel plate dimensions and concrete strength on these distributions. The results indicated strong confinement effects at the boundary positions, while virtually no effect at the mid-span. The stiffness of the corrugated steel plates and the confinement effect were found to be directly proportional. Additionally, a relationship was established between the average lateral stress of the concrete and the effective confinement coefficient of the CFCST through data fitting, leading to a design formula for calculating the axial compression capacity of CFCST columns. Finally, the accuracy of the formula and its applicability in engineering design were confirmed through validation on experimental data, with the maximum deviation being within ±5%.

波形钢板-混凝土组合柱轴压性能与约束机理研究

[1](American Concrete Institute)ACI, 2019. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, ACI 318-19. ACI, Farmington Hills, USA.

[2]BadalamentiV, CampioneG, MangiavillanoML, 2010. Simplified model for compressive behavior of concrete columns strengthened by steel angles and strips. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 136(2):230-238.

[3]ChenYL, TongJZ, LiQH, et al., 2024. Application of high-performance cementitious composites in steel–concrete composite bridge deck systems: a review. Journal of Intelligent Construction, 2(2):1-23.

[4]ChenYL, TongJZ, LiQH, et al., 2025a. Axial compressive tests and resistance design of UHTCC-encased rectangular steel tubular bridge columns. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 30(6):04025033.

[5]ChenYL, TongJZ, LiQH, et al., 2025b. Local instability and interactive mechanism analysis of UHTCC-encased rectangular steel tubular columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 228:109444.

[6]DouC, RuY, JiangZQ, et al., 2024. Lateral resistant behavior of grid-reinforced steel corrugated shear walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 150(6):04024047.

[7]FangY, WangYY, YangH, et al., 2022. Experimental behavior of concrete-filled thin-walled corrugated steel tubes with large helical angles under monotonic and cyclic axial compression. Thin-Walled Structures, 173:109043.

[8]FangY, WangYY, YangLG, et al., 2023. Uniaxial monotonic and cyclic compressive stress–strain model for concrete-filled thin-walled helical corrugated steel tubes. Journal of Structural Engineering, 149(6):04023052.

[9]FurlongRW, 1967. Strength of steel-encased concrete beam columns. Journal of the Structural Division, 93(5):113-124.

[10]GongFY, SunXJ, TakahashiY, et al., 2023. Computational modeling of combined frost damage and alkali-silica reaction on the durability and fatigue life of RC bridge decks. Journal of Intelligent Construction, 1(1):1-14.

[11]HanLH, 2016. Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Structures—Theory and Practice. 3rd Edition. Science Press, Beijing, China(in Chinese).

[12]HanLH, AnYF, 2014. Performance of concrete-encased CFST stub columns under axial compression. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 93:62-76.

[13]HanLH, LiW, BjorhovdeR, 2014. Developments and advanced applications of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) structures: members. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 100:211-228.

[14]HanLH, WangZB, XuW, et al., 2016. Behavior of concrete-encased CFST members under axial tension. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(2):04015149.

[15]HuB, LiuYY, 2022. Vehicular collision performance evaluation of concrete-filled steel tubular piers designed according to current codes in the US, Europe, and China. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 27(6):04022038.

[16]JiangZQ, NiuZY, ZhangAL, et al., 2024. Design method of axial compression stability for cross-section corrugated plate steel special-shaped column. Thin-Walled Structures, 194:111243.

[17]KnowlesRB, ParkR, 1969. Strength of concrete filled steel tubular columns. Journal of the Structural Division, 95(12):2565-2588.

[18]ManderJB, PriestleyMJN, ParkR, 1988. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8):1804-1826.

[19]NaguibW, MirmiranA, 2003. Creep analysis of axially loaded fiber reinforced polymer-confined concrete columns. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 129(11):1308-1319.

[20]RichartFE, BrandtzægA, BrownRL, 1928. A Study of the Failure of Concrete Under Combined Compressive Stresses. Technical Report No. 185, Engineering Experimental Station, University of Illinois, Urbana, USA.

[21]RichartFE, BrandtzægA, BrownRL, 1929. The Failure of Plain and Spirally Reinforced Concrete in Compression. Technical Report No. 190, Engineering Experimental Station, University of Illinois, Urbana, USA.

[22]SunZX, ZouY, WangCQ, et al., 2022. Study on confinement mechanism of core concrete in steel tubular-corrugated steel plate confined concrete columns. Journal of Building Engineering, 52:104497.

[23]TianYH, FengY, GaoW, 2025. Virtual modelling framework-based inverse study for the mechanical metamaterials with material nonlinearity. Modelling, 6(1):24.

[24]TongGS, 2022. Design Methods for Steel Structures and Steel–Concrete Composite Structures. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China(in Chinese).

[25]TongJZ, ZhangJB, TongGS, et al., 2022. Flexural tests and behavior of multi-celled corrugated-plate CFST members. Journal of Building Engineering, 49:104051.

[26]TongJZ, WuRM, WangLQ, 2023a. Experimental and numerical investigations on seismic behavior of stiffened corrugated steel plate shear walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 52(12):3551-3574.

[27]TongJZ, WuRM, XuZY, et al., 2023b. Subassemblage tests on seismic behavior of double-corrugated-plate shear walls. Engineering Structures, 276:115341.

[28]TongJZ, YuCQ, TongGS, et al., 2023c. Experimental study on axial resistant behavior of multi-celled corrugated-plate CFST walls. Engineering Structures, 295:116795.

[29]TongJZ, ZhangJM, YuCQ, et al., 2024a. Seismic experiments and shear resistance prediction of multi-celled corrugated-plate CFST walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 53(5):1681-1704.

[30]TongJZ, WangLQ, WuRM, et al., 2024b. Cyclic test and analysis of UHTCC-enhanced buckling-restrained steel plate shear walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 53(13):4006-4031.

[31]TongJZ, ZhangJM, YuCQ, et al., 2024c. Experimental study on axial compressive behavior of concrete-filled corrugated steel tubular columns. Engineering Structures, 313:118267.

[32]TongJZ, ChenYL, LiQH, et al., 2025. Flexural performance and crack width prediction of steel-UHTCC composite bridge decks with wet joints. Engineering Structures, 323:119264.

[33]WangFC, HanLH, 2018. Analytical behavior of special-shaped CFST stub columns under axial compression. Thin-Walled Structures, 129:404-417.

[34]WangWQ, WangJF, GuoL, 2022. Mechanical behavior analysis of LEM-infilled cold-formed steel walls. Sustainable Structures, 2(1):000013.

[35]WenCB, GuoYL, SunHJ, et al., 2023. Experimental and numerical study on seismic performance of concrete-infilled double steel corrugated-plate walls. Journal of Building Engineering, 68:106171.

[36]WuRM, WangLQ, TongJZ, et al., 2024. Elastic buckling formulas of multi-stiffened corrugated steel plate shear walls. Engineering Structures, 300:117218.

[37]WuRM, YuCQ, WangLQ, et al., 2025. Shear elastic buckling of corrugated steel plate shear walls with stiffeners considering torsional rigidity. Thin-Walled Structures, 206:112646.

[38]YuCQ, TongJZ, TongGS, et al., 2023. Axial compressive performance and design of multi-celled corrugated-plate CFST walls. Structures, 57:105303.

[39]YuCQ, TongGS, TongJZ, et al., 2024a. Experimental and numerical study on seismic performance of L-shaped multi-cellular CFST frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 213:108360.

[40]YuCQ, TongJZ, ZhouSM, et al., 2024b. State-of-the-art review on steel–concrete composite walls. Sustain Struct, 4(1):000035.

[41]YuCQ, TongJZ, ZhangJM, et al., 2025a. Axial compressive behavior of multi-celled corrugated-plate CFST walls: tests and numerical simulations. Engineering Structures, 322:119033.

[42]YuCQ, DuanSJ, TongJZ, 2025b. Global buckling simulation and design of a novel concrete-filled corrugated steel tubular column. Modelling, 6(1):22.

[43]YuM, HuX, XuLH, et al., 2022. A general unified method for calculating fire resistance of CFST columns considering various types of steel and concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 59:105125.

[44]ZhangJW, TongJZ, YuCQ, et al., 2023. Experimental evaluation on seismic performance of multi-celled corrugated-plate CFST walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 201:107743.

[45]ZhangJM, TongGS, TongJZ, 2025. Global buckling prevention of multi-celled corrugated-plate CFST walls under pure in-plane bending loads. Engineering Structures, 332:120061.

[46]ZhangL, YangSL, FuB, et al., 2021a. Behavior and design of concrete-filled narrow rectangular steel tubular (CFNRST) stub columns under axial compression. Journal of Building Engineering, 37:102166.

[47]ZhangL, YangSL, TongGS, et al., 2021b. Numerical analysis on concrete-filled wide rectangular steel tubular (CFWRST) stub columns under axial compression. Structures, 34:4715-4730.

[48]ZhangYJ, TongGS, TongJZ, et al., 2023. Experimental and numerical study on post-ultimate ductile performance of multi-celled concrete-filled steel tubular walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 211:108097.