Full Text:
<2331>
CLC number: R69
On-line Access:
Received: 1998-12-08
Revision Accepted: 1999-05-20
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 0
Clicked: 4063
A PLURALISTIC UNDERSTANDING OF MORALITY AND GLOBAL COEXISTENCE
| |||||||||||||
BAO Li-min. A PLURALISTIC UNDERSTANDING OF MORALITY AND GLOBAL COEXISTENCE[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2000, 1(1): 111-118.
@article{title="A PLURALISTIC UNDERSTANDING OF MORALITY AND GLOBAL COEXISTENCE",
author="BAO Li-min",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="1",
number="1",
pages="111-118",
year="2000",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2000.0111"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T A PLURALISTIC UNDERSTANDING OF MORALITY AND GLOBAL COEXISTENCE
%A BAO Li-min
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 1
%N 1
%P 111-118
%@ 1869-1951
%D 2000
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2000.0111
TY - JOUR
T1 - A PLURALISTIC UNDERSTANDING OF MORALITY AND GLOBAL COEXISTENCE
A1 - BAO Li-min
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 1
IS - 1
SP - 111
EP - 118
%@ 1869-1951
Y1 - 2000
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2000.0111
Abstract: To deal with the problems of the disquieting biases between cultures in our times, the author analyzed the multiple horizon character of morality, proposed a four level model of morality. By using this alternative model of ethics, the author exposes the frailties of cultural stereotypes in both the East and the West, arguing that the moral efforts of all nations should be appreciated. The reason that people do not often see this fact comes mainly from their preoccupations with different moral horizons. The dialogue between different moral horizons and hence different cultures will help each side to develop a more adequate value system which can better solve problems decisive for the coexistence in global context.
[1]Aristotle, 1954. Ethica Nicomachea. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.1131a29-31.
[2]Aristotle, 1950. Politics. Orxford University Press, Oxford, p.1262a25.
[3]Bertsch, G., Power and Policy in Communist Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 1982, p.viii.
[4]Blum, L., 1980. Friendship, Altruism, and Morality. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, p.68.
[5]Confucius, 1980. Analects. Zhonghuashuju, Beijing, p.138.
[6]Confucius, 1980. Analects, Zhonghuashuju, Beijing, p.80.
[7]Frankena, W. K., 1963. Ethics. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, p.42.
[8]Gilligan, C., 1982. In a Different Voice-Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p.54.
[9]Hegel, G. W. F., 1961. Principles of Philosophy of Rights. Shangwu Press, Beijing, p.42.
[10]Kohlberg, G., 1981. Philosophy of Moral Development. Harper & Row, San Francisco, p.194.
[11]MacIntyre, A., 1984. A Short History of Ethics.Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, p.190-198.
[12]Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge University Press, p.438.
[13]Taylor, C., 1983. Hegel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p.377.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>