Similar articles

Abstract: Current research focussed on the assessment of metal machining process parameters and on the development of adaptive control, shows that machine performance, work-piece and tool material selections, tool life, quality of machined surfaces, the geometry of cutting tool edges, and cutting conditions are closely related to the cutting forces. This information is of great interest to cutting tool manufactures and users alike. Over the years there have been significant developments and improvements in the equipment used to monitor such forces. In 1930 mechanical gauges were replaced by resistance strain gauges, and some 30 years later compact air gauge dynamometers were invented. Since this time intensive research has continued being directed towards developing new approaches to cutting force measurement. The Kistler Company, well-known manufacturer of acceleration and piezoelectrical dynamometers, has worked in this field for more than three decades, and developed very sensitive devices. While leading manufacturing research laboratories are often equipped with this technology, classical electrical strain gauges and other dynamometers of individual designs are still commonly used in industry. The present paper presents data obtained using different techniques of force measurement in metal machining processes. In particular, areas of uncertainties, illustrated through results concerning the turning process, are analysed, leading to an appraisal of the current status of these measurements and their significance.

[1] Catalogue 500 Part A-B―Strain Gauges, 1994. Micro-Measurement Division Company, USA.

[2] Evans, J.C., Morgan, I.G., 1964. The Pneumatic Gauging Technique in its Application to Dimensional Measurement. Notes on Applied Science No.34, H.M.S.O, London.

[3] Field, J.S., 1967. A compact dynamometer using strain gauge principles. The International Journal of Production Research, 6(2):75-82.

[4] Gautschi, G.H., 1971. Cutting Forces in Machining and Their Routine Measurement with Multi-component Piezo-electric Force Transducers. 12th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, Manchester, p.1-8.

[5] Gibson, A., Kobler, H., 1967. Elimination of interactions in dynamometer instrumentation. The International Journal of Production Research, 6(2):83-86.

[6] Herman, F.L., 1961. Analysis of Errors in Calibration of Electronic Instruments. AIEE Comm. and Alec., p.90-95.

[7] Kail, R., Mahr, W., 1995. Piezoelectric Measuring Instruments and Their Applications. John Morris Scientific Pty Ltd., Kistler, Switzerland, p.3-27.

[8] Kazimir, I., Audy, J., 1990. Technological Phenomena and Their Evaluation by a Computer, Trend Vuma. Alpha Technical and Economical Literature, Slovakia, Vol.1.

[9] Murty, S.S.N., 1977. A study on the precision of metal cutting dynamometers. Microtecnic, 4:37-40.

[10] Ohtani, T., 1986. Cutting force characteristics in machining of hardened steel. Bull. Japan Soc. of Prec. Eng., (2):127-129.

[11] Pople, J., 1977. Errors and Uncertainties in Strain Measurement. Vickers Shipbuilding and Engineering Ltd., Barrow-in Furness, UK, p.209-262.

[12] Pople, J., 1980. BSSM Strain Measurement Reference Book, BSSM 281. England.

[13] Ravindra, H.V., Srinivasa, Y.G., Krishnamurthy, R., 1993. Modeling of tool wear based on cutting forces in turning. Wear, 169(1):25-32.

[14] Subramanian, C., Strafford, K.N., Wilks, T.P., Ward, L.P., McPhee, M.A., 1993. Performance evaluation of TiN-coated twist drills using force measurement and microscopy. Surf. Coat. Technol., 62(1-3):85.

[15] Webb, C.R., Luxmoore, A.R., 1971. Applied Mechanics. In: Experimentation for Students of Engineering, Vol. 2. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., London, p.124.