Similar articles

Abstract: Numerous experiments have shown that the water flow in fine-grained soils can obey an exponential relationship at small gradients and a linear relationship when the hydraulic gradient exceeds a certain limit. Based on the non-Darcian flow described by exponent and threshold gradient, the theory of 1D consolidation is modified in this paper to consider a linear variation in the vertical total stress with depth and the effect of ramp loading. The numerical solutions were derived in detail by the finite difference method for excess pore water pressure and the average degree of consolidation. Finally, the influence of various parameters on consolidation behavior was investigated. The results show that the rate of consolidation is reduced when non-Darcian flow described by exponent and threshold gradient is adopted in the theory of 1D consolidation. As well the distribution of vertical total stress has a great influence on the dissipation of excess pore water pressure, either for pervious top and pervious bottom (PTPB) or for pervious top and impervious bottom (PTIB). For the case of PTIB, the distribution of vertical total stress in a foundation has a great influence on the rate of consolidation; however, for the case of PTPB, the rate of consolidation is independent of the distribution of vertical total stress. The rate of consolidation is dependent on the ratio of the thickness of a soil layer to the equivalent head of the final average vertical total stress; the greater the value of this ratio, the slower the rate of consolidation. Finally, an increase in construction time reduces the consolidation rate of a foundation. Thus, consolidation behavior of 1D consolidation with non-Darcian flow has been thoroughly acquainted in this paper.

[1]Dubin, B., Moulin, G., 1985. Influence of a Critical Gradient on the Consolidation of Clays. In: Yong, R.N., Townsend, F.C. (Eds.), Consolidation of Soils: Testing and Evaluation (STP 892), ASTM, p.354-377.

[2]Elnaggar, H.A., Krizek, R.J., 1973. Effect of non-Darcy flow on time rate of consolidation. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 296(5):323-337.

[3]Hansbo, S., 1960. Consolidation of clay with special reference to influence of vertical drains. Swedish Geotechnical Institute Proceeding, 18:45-50.

[4]Hansbo, S., 1997. Aspects of vertical drain design: Darcian or non-Darcian flow. Geotechnique, 47(5):983-992.

[5]Hansbo, S., 2003. Deviation from Darcy’s law observed in 1D consolidation. Geotechnique, 53(6):601-605.

[6]Liu, Z.Y., Sun, L.Y., Yue, J.C., Ma, C.W., 2009. 1D consolidation theory of saturated clay based on non-Darcy flow. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 28(5):973-979 (in Chinese).

[7]Miller, R.J., Low, P.E., 1963. Threshold gradient for water flow in clay systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 27(6):605-609.

[8]Olsen, H.W., 1985. Osmosis: a cause of apparent deviation from Darcy’s law. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 22(2):238-241.

[9]Schmidt, J.D., Westmann, R.A., 1973. Consolidation of porous media with non-Darcy flow. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 99(6):1201-1216.

[10]Swartzendruber, D., 1962. Modification of Darcy’s law for the flow of water in soils. Soil Science, 93(1):22-29.

[11]Teh, C.I., Nie, X.Y., 2002. Coupled consolidation theory with non-Darcian flow. Computers and Geotechnics, 29(3):169-209.

[12]Xie, H.L., Wu, Q., Zhao, Z.M., Jin, X.L., Li, J., 2007. Consolidation computation of aquitard considering non-Darcy flow. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 28(5):1061-1065 (in Chinese).

[13]Zhu, G., Yin, J.H., 1998. Consolidation of soil under depth-dependent ramp load. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 35(2):344-350.