CLC number: TV81
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2018-06-06
Cited: 0
Clicked: 4410
Jin-xiao Zhao, Guo-lu Yang, Monika Kreitmair, Yao Yue. A simple method for calculating in-situ settling velocities of cohesive sediment without fractal dimensions[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2018, 19(7): 544-556.
@article{title="A simple method for calculating in-situ settling velocities of cohesive sediment without fractal dimensions",
author="Jin-xiao Zhao, Guo-lu Yang, Monika Kreitmair, Yao Yue",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="19",
number="7",
pages="544-556",
year="2018",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A1700185"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T A simple method for calculating in-situ settling velocities of cohesive sediment without fractal dimensions
%A Jin-xiao Zhao
%A Guo-lu Yang
%A Monika Kreitmair
%A Yao Yue
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 19
%N 7
%P 544-556
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2018
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1700185
TY - JOUR
T1 - A simple method for calculating in-situ settling velocities of cohesive sediment without fractal dimensions
A1 - Jin-xiao Zhao
A1 - Guo-lu Yang
A1 - Monika Kreitmair
A1 - Yao Yue
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 19
IS - 7
SP - 544
EP - 556
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2018
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A1700185
Abstract: The settling velocity of sediment flocs is central to the study of the transportation process of contaminants in aqueous ecosystems. To describe the irregular shape of flocs, fractal theory based on the image analysis method is commonly used. However, this method usually leads to non-unique results as it requires the selection of a threshold intensity. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to develop a method to determine the settling velocity of both flocs and particles without using the fractal dimension. To achieve this goal, porosity was introduced as a substitute for the fractal dimension, and a simple method with three variables, floc diameter, mass concentration, and volume concentration of flocs, was developed. A density function method was used to obtain the floc porosity from a laser particle sizer which could obtain the volume concentration of sediment and an optical backscatter point sensor (OBS). Laboratory tests on two sediments from two different lakes were conducted. Results indicate that this method has a higher accuracy than traditional methods such as the Stokes equation and the Rubey equation. The variable density function performed better than the uniform density function and was, therefore, recommended for calculating the settling velocities for both micro and macro flocs. Using the developed method, the drag coefficient for the flocs was calculated and its accuracy analyzed. The method presented in this paper, which is simpler in determining in-situ settling velocities than traditional methods, also allows for direct inter-comparison between results derived from various studies.
[1]Agrawal YC, Pottsmith HC, 2000. Instruments for particle size and settling velocity observations in sediment transport. Marine Geology, 168(1-4):89-114.
[2]Boyd PW, Trull TW, 2007. Understanding the export of biogenic particles in oceanic waters: is there consensus? Progress in Oceanography, 72(4):276-312.
[3]Brinke WBMT, 1994. Settling velocities of mud aggregates in the Oosterschelde tidal basin (the Netherlands), determined by a submersible video system. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 39(6):549-564.
[4]Callens N, Minetti C, Coupier G, et al., 2008. Hydrodynamic lift of vesicles under shear flow in microgravity. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 83(2):24002.
[5]de Boer DH, Stone M, Levesque LM, 2000. Fractal dimensions of individual flocs and floc populations in streams. Hydrological Processes, 14(4):653-667.
[6]Delnoij E, Westerweel J, Deen NG, et al., 1999. Ensemble correlation PIV applied to bubble plumes rising in a bubble column. Chemical Engineering Science, 54(21):5159-5171.
[7]Dyer KR, Manning AJ, 1999. Observation of the size, settling velocity and effective density of flocs, and their fractal dimensions. Journal of Sea Research, 41(1-2):87-95.
[8]Falconer KJ, 1990. Fractal Geometry Mathematical Foundations and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, USA, p.499-500.
[9]Fettweis M, 2008. Uncertainty of excess density and settling velocity of mud flocs derived from in situ measurements. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 78(2):426-436.
[10]Furukawa K, Wolanski E, Mueller H, 1997. Currents and sediment transport in mangrove forests. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 44(3):301-310.
[11]Imre AR, 2006. Artificial fractal dimension obtained by using perimeter–area relationship on digitalized images. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 173(1):443-449.
[12]Jiang Q, Logan BE, 1991. Fractal dimensions of aggregates determined from steady-state size distributions. Environmental Science & Technology, 25(12):2031-2038.
[13]Kranenburg C, 1994. The fractal structure of cohesive sediment aggregates. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 39(6):451-460.
[14]Maggi F, 2008. Projection of compact fractal sets: application to diffusion-limited and cluster-cluster aggregates. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 15(4):695-699.
[15]Maggi F, 2013. The settling velocity of mineral, biomineral, and biological particles and aggregates in water. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118(4):2118-2132.
[16]Maggi F, Manning AJ, Winterwerp JC, 2006. Image separation and geometric characterisation of mud flocs. Journal of Hydrology, 326(1-4):325-348.
[17]Markussen TN, Andersen TJ, 2013. A simple method for calculating in situ floc settling velocities based on effective density functions. Marine Geology, 344(4):10-18.
[18]Meakin P, 1991. Fractal aggregates in geophysics. Reviews of Geophysics, 29(3):317-354.
[19]Mikkelsen OA, Pejrup M, 2000. In situ particle size spectra and density of particle aggregates in a dredging plume. Marine Geology, 170(3-4):443-459.
[20]Rubey WW, 1933. Settling velocity of gravel, sand, and silt particles. American Journal of Science, s5-25(148):325-338.
[21]Shang QQ, Fang HW, Zhao HM, et al., 2014. Biofilm effects on size gradation, drag coefficient and settling velocity of sediment particles. International Journal of Sediment Research, 29(4):471-480.
[22]Smith SJ, Friedrichs CT, 2011. Size and settling velocities of cohesive flocs and suspended sediment aggregates in a trailing suction hopper dredge plume. Continental Shelf Research, 31(10):S50-S63.
[23]Sochan A, Bieganowski A, Ryżak M, et al., 2012. Comparison of soil texture determined by two dispersion units of Mastersizer 2000. International Agrophysics, 26(1):99-102.
[24]Spearman J, Bray RN, Land J, et al., 2007. Plume dispersion modelling using dynamic representation of trailer dredger source terms. Proceedings in Marine Science, 8:417-448.
[25]Sumer BM, Kozakiewicz A, Fredsøe J, et al., 1996. Velocity and concentration profiles in sheet-flow layer of movable bed. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 122(10):549-558.
[26]Vahedi A, Gorczyca B, 2011. Application of fractal dimensions to study the structure of flocs formed in lime softening process. Water Research, 45(2):545-556.
[27]Vahedi A, Gorczyca B, 2012. Predicting the settling velocity of flocs formed in water treatment using multiple fractal dimensions. Water Research, 46(13):4188-4194.
[28]Voulgaris G, Meyers ST, 2004. Temporal variability of hydrodynamics, sediment concentration and sediment settling velocity in a tidal creek. Continental Shelf Research, 24(15):1659-1683.
[29]Wilber D, Clarke D, 2001. Biological effects of suspended sediments: a review of suspended sediment impacts on fish and shellfish with relation to dredging activities in estuaries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 21(4):855-875.
[30]Zhang RJ, 1998. River Sediment Dynamics. China Water Power Press, Beijing, China, p.35-36 (in Chinese).
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>