Full Text:   <1094>

Summary:  <1184>

CLC number: U270

On-line Access: 2020-10-15

Received: 2020-01-21

Revision Accepted: 2020-08-28

Crosschecked: 2020-09-27

Cited: 0

Clicked: 1440

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714


Yun-guang Ye


Da-chuan Shi


Sara Poveda-Reyes


-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2020 Vol.21 No.10 P.783-798


Quantification of the influence of rolling stock failures on track deterioration

Author(s):  Yun-guang Ye, Da-chuan Shi, Sara Poveda-Reyes, Markus Hecht

Affiliation(s):  Institute of Land and Sea Transport Systems, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin 10587, Germany; more

Corresponding email(s):   dachuan.shi@tu-berlin.de

Key Words:  Rolling stock failure (RSF), Track deterioration, Quantification, Track charging, Wheel flat

This article has been corrected, see doi:10.1631/jzus.A20e0033

Share this article to: More |Next Article >>>

Yun-guang Ye, Da-chuan Shi, Sara Poveda-Reyes, Markus Hecht. Quantification of the influence of rolling stock failures on track deterioration[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2020, 21(10): 783-798.

@article{title="Quantification of the influence of rolling stock failures on track deterioration",
author="Yun-guang Ye, Da-chuan Shi, Sara Poveda-Reyes, Markus Hecht",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T Quantification of the influence of rolling stock failures on track deterioration
%A Yun-guang Ye
%A Da-chuan Shi
%A Sara Poveda-Reyes
%A Markus Hecht
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 21
%N 10
%P 783-798
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2020
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2000033

T1 - Quantification of the influence of rolling stock failures on track deterioration
A1 - Yun-guang Ye
A1 - Da-chuan Shi
A1 - Sara Poveda-Reyes
A1 - Markus Hecht
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 21
IS - 10
SP - 783
EP - 798
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2020
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2000033

This study focuses on the quantification of the influence of rolling stock failures (RSFs) on railway infrastructure. Taking the wheel flat, a common RSF, as an example, we introduce four quantification indexes to evaluate the influence on the following four deterioration mechanisms: track settlement (TS), track component fatigue (TCF), abrasive wear (AW), and rolling contact fatigue (RCF). Our results indicate that TS, TCF, and AW increase sharply with the increase of the wheel flat length and the vehicle speed, and this increasing trend becomes more acute with the increase of the wheel flat length and the vehicle speed. At low speeds, RCF increases gradually as the wheel flat length increases; at high speeds, it increases sharply at first and then decreases gradually. The influence of the wheel flat on TCF and AW is the most obvious, followed by TS and RCF. These findings can help infrastructure managers (IMs) to better understand infrastructure conditions related to RSFs and can aid them in managing problems with vehicle abnormality in track access charging.


创新点:1. 分析一个常见的铁路车辆机械故障(擦伤)对四个用于轨道收费模型的量化指标的影响; 2. 引入金代理模型方法以减少仿真次数.
方法:1. 建立一个带有擦伤的机车多体动力学模型,并考虑车轮和轨道的柔性; 2. 引入金代理模型以量化车辆速度和擦伤尺寸对四种损坏机制(轨道沉降、轨道构件疲劳、钢轨磨耗和钢轨滚动接触疲劳)的影响.
结论:1. 轨道沉降、轨道构件疲劳和钢轨磨耗随着擦伤尺寸和车速的增加而急剧增加,并且这种增加趋势随着擦伤尺寸和车速的增加而变得更加尖锐. 2. 在低速时,滚动接触疲劳随着擦伤尺寸的增加而逐渐增加;在高速时,它首先急剧增加,然后逐渐减小. 3. 擦伤对轨道构件疲劳和钢轨磨耗的影响最为显著,其次是轨道沉降和滚动接触疲劳.


Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

This article has been corrected, see doi:10.1631/jzus.A20e0033


[1]Andreas S, Allan Z, Joseph P, et al., 2012. Development of the Future Rail Freight System to Reduce the Occurrences and Impact of Derailment. D-RAIL Project Report, European Commission.

[2]Appel P, Hecht M, 2017. Möglichkeiten zur Lärmminderung des Schienengüterverkehrs in Deutschland. Lärmbekä-mpfung, 12(2):47-56 (in German).

[3]Baeza L, Fayos J, Roda A, et al., 2008. High frequency railway vehicle-track dynamics through flexible rotating wheelsets. Vehicle System Dynamics, 46(7):647-659.

[4]Belotti V, Crenna F, Michelini RC, et al., 2006. Wheel-flat diagnostic tool via wavelet transform. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(8):1953-1966.

[5]Bernal E, Spiryagin M, Cole C, 2019. Wheel flat detectability for Y25 railway freight wagon using vehicle component acceleration signals. Vehicle System Dynamics, in press.

[6]Bosso N, Gugliotta A, Zampieri N, 2018. Wheel flat detection algorithm for onboard diagnostic. Measurement, 123: 193-202.

[7]Braghin F, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS, et al., 2006. A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. Wear, 261(11-12):1253-1264.

[8]Bruni S, Alfi S, Gialleonardo ED, et al., 2016. Analysis of Passive and Mechatronic Steering Bogie Solutions for Freight Locomotives–Section 2.3 (Dynafreight-Shift2Rail Poject). Report No. DYF-TSK2, 3-D-POL-037-01, European Commission.

[9]Burstow M, 2003. Whole Life Rail Model Application and Development for RSSB–Development of an RCF Damage Parameter. RSSB Report, AEATR-ES-2003-832 Issue 1, Rail Safety & Standards Boards, London, UK.

[10]Chaar N, Berg M, 2006. Simulation of vehicle–track interaction with flexible wheelsets, moving track models and field tests. Vehicle System Dynamics, 44(S1):921-931.

[11]Chowdhury R, Adhikari S, 2012. Fuzzy parametric uncertainty analysis of linear dynamical systems: a surrogate modeling approach. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 32:5-17.

[12]Chrismer S, Selig ET, 1993. Computer model for ballast maintenance planning. Proceedings of 5th International Heavy Haul Railway Conference, p.223-227.

[13]Elkhoury N, Hitihamillage L, Moridpour S, et al., 2018. Degradation prediction of rail tracks: a review of the existing literature. The Open Transportation Journal, 12(1):88-104.

[14]Enblom R, 2009. Deterioration mechanisms in the wheel–rail interface with focus on wear prediction: a literature review. Vehicle System Dynamics, 47(6):661-700.

[15]Falomi S, Malvezzi M, Meli E, 2011. Multibody modeling of railway vehicles: innovative algorithms for the detection of wheel–rail contact points. Wear, 271(1-2):453-461.

[16]Halama R, Fajkoš R, Matušek P, et al., 2011. Contact defects initiation in railroad wheels–experience, experiments and modelling. Wear, 271(1-2):174-185.

[17]Han J, Zhong SQ, Xiao XB, et al., 2018. High-speed wheel/rail contact determining method with rotating flexible wheelset and validation under wheel polygon excitation. Vehicle System Dynamics, 56(8):1233-1249.

[18]Hecht M, Leiste M, Jobstfinke D, et al., 2018. Roadmap zur Digitalisierung der Wagentechnischen Untersuchung. Technical Report, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany (in German).

[19]Higgins C, Liu X, 2018. Modeling of track geometry degradation and decisions on safety and maintenance: a literature review and possible future research directions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 232(5):1385-1397.

[20]Liang B, Iwnicki SD, Zhao Y, et al., 2013. Railway wheel-flat and rail surface defect modelling and analysis by time– frequency techniques. Vehicle System Dynamics, 51(9):1403-1421.

[21]Lyon D, 1972. The calculation of track forces due to dipped rail joints, wheel flats and rail welds. Proceedings of the 2nd ORE Colloquium on Technical Computer Programs.

[22]Mitusch K, Hecht M, 2017. Lärm des Schienengüterverkehrs-wie weiter nach Einführung der Verbundbremssohle. ZEVrail, 141(8):294-300 (in German).

[23]Öberg J, 2006. Track Deterioration of Ballasted Tracks: Marginal Cost Models for Different Railway Vehicles. TRITA-AVE Report No. 88, Division of Rail Vehicles, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

[24]Öberg J, Andersson E, 2009. Determining the deterioration cost for railway tracks. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 223(2):121-129.

[25]Odolinski K, Nilsson JE, 2017. Estimating the marginal maintenance cost of rail infrastructure usage in Sweden; does more data make a difference? Economics of Transportation, 10:8-17.

[26]Pearce TG, Sherratt ND, 1991. Prediction of wheel profile wear. Wear, 144(1-2):343-351.

[27]Peng B, Iwnicki S, Shackleton P, et al., 2019. Comparison of wear models for simulation of railway wheel polygonization. Wear, 436-437:203010.

[28]Pombo J, Ambrósio J, Pereira M, et al., 2011. Development of a wear prediction tool for steel railway wheels using three alternative wear functions. Wear, 271(1-2):238-245.

[29]Regazzi D, Alfi S, Bruni S, et al., 2019. Cost-driven and eliability-driven analysis of wagon condition data (INNOWAG Project). European Commission. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/206229/factsheet/en

[30]Shenton MJ, 1984. Ballast deformation and track deterioration. Proceedings of a Conference on Track Technology, p.253-265.

[31]Smith A, Iwnicki S, Kaushal A, et al., 2017. Estimating the relative cost of track damage mechanisms: combining economic and engineering approaches. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 231(5):620-636.

[32]Smith ASJ, Kaushal A, Odolinski K, et al., 2015. Estimating the damage and marginal cost of different vehicle types on rail infrastructure: combining economic and engineering approaches. The Stephenson Conference: Research for Railways, p.21-23.

[33]Smith ASJ, Odolinski K, Saeed HN, et al., 2016. Estimating the Marginal Cost of Different Vehicle Types on Rail Infrastructure. Working Papers in Transport Economics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden. https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/ctswps/2016_026.html

[34]Smith RA, 2003. The wheel–rail interface—some recent accidents. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 26(10):901-907.

[35]Soleimanmeigouni I, Ahmadi A, Kumar U, 2018. Track geometry degradation and maintenance modelling: a review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 232(1):73-102.

[36]Tao GQ, Du X, Zhang HJ, et al., 2017. Development and validation of a model for predicting wheel wear in high-speed trains. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 18(8):603-616.

[37]Tao GQ, Ren DX, Wang LF, et al., 2018. Online prediction model for wheel wear considering track flexibility. Multibody System Dynamics, 44(3):313-334.

[38]Wheat P, Smith ASJ, 2008. Assessing the marginal infrastructure maintenance wear and tear costs for Britain’s railway network. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 42(2):189-224.

[39]Wu XW, Rakheja S, Ahmed AKW, et al., 2018. Influence of a flexible wheelset on the dynamic responses of a high-speed railway car due to a wheel flat. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 232(4):1033-1048.

[40]Xin CF, Lu Q, Ai CF, et al., 2017. Optimization of hard modified asphalt formula for gussasphalt based on uniform experimental design. Construction and Building Materials, 136:556-564.

[41]Ye YG, Sun Y, 2020. Reducing wheel wear from the perspective of rail track layout optimization. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, in press.

[42]Ye YG, Shi DC, Krause P, et al., 2020a. A data-driven method for estimating wheel flat length. Vehicle System Dynamics, 58(9):1329-1347.

[43]Ye YG, Sun Y, Dongfang SP, et al., 2020b. Optimizing wheel profiles and suspensions for railway vehicles operating on specific lines to reduce wheel wear: a case study. Multibody System Dynamics, in press.

[44]Ye YG, Shi DC, Sun Y, et al., 2020c. Rotary-scaling fine-tuning (RSFT) method for optimizing railway wheel profiles and its application to a locomotive. Railway Engineering Science, 28(2):160-183.

[45]Ye YG, Shi DC, Krause P, et al., 2020d. Wheel flat can cause or exacerbate wheel polygonization. Vehicle System Dynamics, 58(10):1575-1604.

[46]Zobory I, 1997. Prediction of wheel/rail profile wear. Vehicle System Dynamics, 28(2-3):221-259.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2022 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE