CLC number: S854.8
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2020-04-07
Cited: 0
Clicked: 3103
Hua Zhang, Zhi-Min Wu, Ya-Ping Yang, Aftab Shaukat, Jing Yang, Ying-Fang Guo, Tao Zhang, Xin-Ying Zhu, Jin-Xia Qiu, Gan-Zhen Deng, Dong-Mei Shi. Erratum to: Catalpol ameliorates LPS-induced endometritis by inhibiting inflammation and TLR4/NF-κB signaling[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2020, 21(4): 341-341.
@article{title="Erratum to: Catalpol ameliorates LPS-induced endometritis by inhibiting inflammation and TLR4/NF-κB signaling",
author="Hua Zhang, Zhi-Min Wu, Ya-Ping Yang, Aftab Shaukat, Jing Yang, Ying-Fang Guo, Tao Zhang, Xin-Ying Zhu, Jin-Xia Qiu, Gan-Zhen Deng, Dong-Mei Shi",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="21",
number="4",
pages="341-341",
year="2020",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B19e0071"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Erratum to: Catalpol ameliorates LPS-induced endometritis by inhibiting inflammation and TLR4/NF-κB signaling
%A Hua Zhang
%A Zhi-Min Wu
%A Ya-Ping Yang
%A Aftab Shaukat
%A Jing Yang
%A Ying-Fang Guo
%A Tao Zhang
%A Xin-Ying Zhu
%A Jin-Xia Qiu
%A Gan-Zhen Deng
%A Dong-Mei Shi
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 21
%N 4
%P 341-341
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2020
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B19e0071
TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum to: Catalpol ameliorates LPS-induced endometritis by inhibiting inflammation and TLR4/NF-κB signaling
A1 - Hua Zhang
A1 - Zhi-Min Wu
A1 - Ya-Ping Yang
A1 - Aftab Shaukat
A1 - Jing Yang
A1 - Ying-Fang Guo
A1 - Tao Zhang
A1 - Xin-Ying Zhu
A1 - Jin-Xia Qiu
A1 - Gan-Zhen Deng
A1 - Dong-Mei Shi
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 21
IS - 4
SP - 341
EP - 341
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2020
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B19e0071
Abstract: Erratum to: J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol) 2019 2019 20(10):816-827. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1900071. The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. In p.823, Figs. 8c and 8d were in-correct, and the obvious pathological changes were mistakenly placed in the picture. The correct versions should be as follows:
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>