CLC number:
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2023-04-25
Cited: 0
Clicked: 1165
Shiguo XIAO, Yuan QI, Pan XIA. General variational solution for seismic and static active earth pressure on rigid walls considering soil tensile strength cut-off[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2023, 24(5): 432-449.
@article{title="General variational solution for seismic and static active earth pressure on rigid walls considering soil tensile strength cut-off",
author="Shiguo XIAO, Yuan QI, Pan XIA",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="24",
number="5",
pages="432-449",
year="2023",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A2200340"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T General variational solution for seismic and static active earth pressure on rigid walls considering soil tensile strength cut-off
%A Shiguo XIAO
%A Yuan QI
%A Pan XIA
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 24
%N 5
%P 432-449
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2023
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2200340
TY - JOUR
T1 - General variational solution for seismic and static active earth pressure on rigid walls considering soil tensile strength cut-off
A1 - Shiguo XIAO
A1 - Yuan QI
A1 - Pan XIA
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 24
IS - 5
SP - 432
EP - 449
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2023
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2200340
Abstract: According to the limit equilibrium state of soils behind rigid walls and the pseudo-static approach, a general closed-form solution to seismic and static active earth pressure on the walls, which considers shear and tension failure of the retained soil, is put forward using a variational calculus method. The application point of the active resultant force specified in the proposed method is explained with a clear physical meaning related to possible movement modes of the walls. In respect of the derived nine dependent equations reflecting the functional characteristics of the earth pressure, the proposed method can be performed easily via an implicit strategy. There are 13 basic factors related to the retained soils, walls, and external loads to be involved in the proposed method. The tension crack segment of the slip surface is obviously influenced by these parameters, apart from vertical seismic coefficient and geometric bounds of the surcharge, but the shear slip segment maintains an approximately planar shape almost uninfluenced by these parameters. Noticeably, the proposed method quantitatively reflects that the resultant of the active earth pressure is always within a limited range under different possible movements of the same wall.
[1]BakerR, GarberM, 1978. Theoretical analysis of the stability of slopes. Géotechnique, 28(4):395-411.
[2]BellAL, 1915. The lateral pressure and resistance of clay and the supporting power of clay foundations. Minutes of the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 199(1915):233-272.
[3]FranzG, 1983. Beton Kalender. Verlag von Wilhelm Ernst and Sohn, Munich, Germany (in German).
[4]CernicaJN, 1995. Geotechnical Engineering: Foundation Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.
[5]ChangMF, 1997. Lateral earth pressures behind rotating walls. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34(4):498-509.
[6]ChenJG, YangY, ChenYH, et al., 2020. Calculation of active earth pressure of cohesive soil behind retaining wall considering soil tensile strength. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 41(6):1829-1835 (in Chinese).
[7]ChenWF, 1975. Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[8]ChoudhuryD, SinghS, 2006. New approach for estimation of static and seismic active earth pressure. Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 24(1):117-127.
[9]CoulombCA, 1776. Essai sur une application des règles de maximis & minimis à quelques problèmes de statique, relatifs à l’architecture microform. In: Mémoires de Mathématique et de Physique. de l’Imprimerie Royale, Paris, France, p.343-382 (in French).
[10]de Josselin de Jong G, 1980. Application of the calculus of variations to the vertical cut off cohesive frictionless soil. Géotechnique, 30(1):1-16.
[11]FangYS, IshibashiI, 1986. Static earth pressures with various wall movements. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 112(3):317-333.
[12]FangYS, ChenTJ, 1995. Modification of Mononobe-Okabe theory. Géotechnique, 45(1):165-167.
[13]FarzanehO, AskariF, FatemiJ, 2014. Active earth pressure induced by strip loads on a backfill. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(4):281-291.
[14]GiaquintaM, HildebrandtS, 2004. Calculus of Variations I. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
[15]GrecoVR, 2006. Lateral earth pressure due to backfill subject to a strip of surcharge. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 24(3):615-636.
[16]HanS, GongJX, ZhangYQ, 2016. Earth pressure of layered soil on retaining structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 83:33-52.
[17]HazarikaH, MatsuzawaH, 1996. Wall displacement modes dependent active earth pressure analyses using smeared shear band method with two bands. Computers and Geotechnics, 19(3):193-219.
[18]HouGX, ShuSZ, 2019. Trial wedge approach to determine lateral earth pressures. International Journal of Geomechanics, 19(1):06018035.
[19]IskanderM, ChenZB, OmidvarM, et al., 2013. Active static and seismic earth pressure for c–φ soils. Soils and Foundations, 53(5):639-652.
[20]KhosraviMH, PipatpongsaT, TakemuraJ, 2013. Experimental analysis of earth pressure against rigid retaining walls under translation mode. Géotechnique, 63(12):1020-1028.
[21]KimJS, BarkerRM, 2002. Effect of live load surcharge on retaining walls and abutments. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128(10):803-813.
[22]KopáscyJ, 1957. Three-dimensional stress distribution and slip surfaces in earth works at rupture. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering, p.339-342.
[23]KrabbenhoftK, 2018. Static and seismic earth pressure coefficients for vertical walls with horizontal backfill. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 104:403-407.
[24]LiJP, WangM, 2014. Simplified method for calculating active earth pressure on rigid retaining walls considering the arching effect under translational mode. International Journal of Geomechanics, 14(2):282-290.
[25]LiXG, LiuWN, 2010. Study on the action of the active earth pressure by variational limit equilibrium method. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 34(10):991-1008.
[26]LiXP, ZhaoSX, HeSM, et al., 2019. Seismic stability analysis of gravity retaining wall supporting c–φ soil with cracks. Soils and Foundations, 59(4):1103-1111.
[27]LiZW, YangXL, 2019. Active earth pressure for retaining structures in cohesive backfills with tensile strength cut-off. Computers and Geotechnics, 110:242-250.
[28]LuanMT, NogamiT, 1997. Variational analysis of earth pressure on a rigid earth-retaining wall. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 123(5):524-530.
[29]MatsuzawaH, HazarikaH, 1996. Analyses of active earth pressure against rigid retaining wall subjected to different modes of movement. Soils and Foundations, 36(3):51-65.
[30]MazindraniZH, GanjaliMH, 1997. Lateral earth pressure problem of cohesive backfill with inclined surface. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123(2):110-112.
[31]MichalowskiRL, 2017. Stability of intact slopes with tensile strength cut-off. Géotechnique, 67(8):720-727.
[32]MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China), 2013. Technical Code for Building Slope Engineering, GB 50330-2013. National Standards of the People’s Republic of China(in Chinese).
[33]MononobeN, 1924. Considerations into earthquake vibrations and vibration theories. Journal of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 10(5):1063-1094.
[34]NianTK, HanJ, 2013. Analytical solution for Rankine’s seismic active earth pressure in c-ϕ soil with infinite slope. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139(9):1611-1616.
[35]NiedostatkiewiczM, LesniewskaD, TejchmanJ, 2011. Experimental analysis of shear zone patterns in cohesionless for earth pressure problems using particle image velocimetry. Strain, 47(S2):218-231.
[36]OkabeS, MemberCE, 1924. General theory on earth pressure and seismic stability of retaining wall and dam. Journal of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 10(6):1277-1323.
[37]PaikKH, SalgadoR, 2003. Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects. Géotechnique, 53(7):643-653.
[38]ParkD, MichalowskiRL, 2017. Three-dimensional stability analysis of slopes in hard soil/soft rock with tensile strength cut-off. Engineering Geology, 229:73-84.
[39]PaulB, 1961. A modification of the Coulomb-Mohr theory of fracture. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 28(2):259-268.
[40]PengMX, ChenJ, 2013. Slip-line solution to active earth pressure on retaining walls. Géotechnique, 63(12):1008-1019.
[41]PułaO, PułaW, WolnyA, 2005. On the variational solution of a limiting equilibrium problem involving an anchored wall. Computers and Geotechnics, 32(2):107-121.
[42]RankineWJM, 1857. II. On the stability of loose earth. Philosophical Transactions, 147:9-27.
[43]RaoPP, ChenQS, ZhouYT, et al., 2016. Determination of active earth pressure on rigid retaining wall considering arching effect in cohesive backfill soil. International Journal of Geomechanics, 16(3):04015082.
[44]RichardsR, ShiX, 1994. Seismic lateral pressures in soils with cohesion. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(7):1230-1251.
[45]SaranS, PrakashS, 1968. Dimensionless parameters for static and dynamic earth pressures behind retaining walls. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 7(3):295-310.
[46]ShuklaSK, GuptaSK, SivakuganN, 2009. Active earth pressure on retaining wall for c-ϕ soil backfill under seismic loading condition. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(5):690-696.
[47]SokolovskiiVV, 1965. Statics of Granular Media. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
[48]SoubraAH, MacuhB, 2002. Active and passive earth pressure coefficients by a kinematical approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 155(2):119-131.
[49]SpencerE, 1968. Effect of tension on stability of embankments. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 94(5):1159-1173.
[50]TangZC, PengYZ, SongJW, 1988. Centrifuge model test of a rigid wall used to retain cohesionless soil. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University, 7(2):48-57 (in Chinese).
[51]MathWorksThe, Inc., 2018. Global Optimization Toolbox: User’s Guide (R2018b). The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, USA. https://www.mathworks.com/help/
[52]TsagareliZV, 1965. Experimental investigation of the pressure of a loose medium on retaining walls with a vertical back face and horizontal backfill surface. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2(4):197-200.
[53]UtiliS, 2013. Investigation by limit analysis on the stability of slopes with cracks. Géotechnique, 63(2):140-154.
[54]WangYZ, 2000. Distribution of earth pressure on a retaining wall. Géotechnique, 50(1):83-88.
[55]WeiM, LuoQ, FengGS, et al., 2022. Shaking table tests on a cantilever retaining wall with reinforced and unreinforced backfill. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 23(11):900-916.
[56]XiaoSG, YanYP, XiaP, 2021. General solution for active earth pressure on rigid walls under strip surcharge on retained soils using variational method. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(8):881-896.
[57]XieY, LeshchinskyB, 2016. Active earth pressures from a log-spiral slip surface with arching effects. Géotechnique Letters, 6(2):149-155.
[58]YangXL, ZhangS, 2019. Seismic active earth pressure for soils with tension cracks. International Journal of Geomechanics, 19(6):06019009.
[59]ZhangF, LeshchinskyD, BakerR, et al., 2016. Implications of variationally derived 3D failure mechanism. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 40(18):2514-2531.
[60]ZhouYT, ChenQS, ChenFQ, et al., 2018. Active earth pressure on translating rigid retaining structures considering soil arching effect. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 22(8):910-926.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>