Similar articles

Abstract: chemical communication in plant-microbiome and intra-microbiome interactions weaves a complex network, critically shaping ecosystem stability and agricultural productivity. This non-contact interaction is driven by small-molecule signals that orchestrate crosstalk dynamics and beneficial association. Plants leverage these signals to distinguish between pathogens and beneficial microbes, dynamically modulate immune responses, and secrete exudates to recruit a beneficial microbiome, while microbes in turn influence plant nutrient acquisition and stress resilience. Such bidirectional chemical dialogues underpin nutrient cycling, co-evolution, microbiome assembly, and plant resistance. However, knowledge gaps persist regarding validating the key molecules involved in plant-microbe interactions. Interpreting chemical communication requires multi-omics integration to predict key information, genome editing and click chemistry to verify the function of biomolecules, and artificial intelligence (AI) models to improve resolution and accuracy. This review helps advance the understanding of chemical communication and provides theoretical support for agriculture to cope with food insecurity and climate challenges.

植物-微生物组和微生物组内相互作用中化学通讯的应用

[1]AshrafiR, BruneauxM, SundbergLR, et al., 2017. Application of high resolution melting assay (HRM) to study temperature-dependent intraspecific competition in a pathogenic bacterium. Sci Rep, 7:980.

[2]AtkinsonNJ, LilleyCJ, UrwinPE, 2013. Identification of genes involved in the response of Arabidopsis to simultaneous biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol, 162(4):2028-2041.

[3]BaiWH, LiC, LiW, et al., 2024. Machine learning assists prediction of genes responsible for plant specialized metabolite biosynthesis by integrating multi-omics data. BMC Genomics, 25:418.

[4]BerrocalA, NavarreteJ, OviedoC, et al., 2012. Quorum sensing activity in Ophiostoma ulmi: effects of fusel oils and branched chain amino acids on yeast-mycelial dimorphism. J Appl Microbiol, 113(1):126-134.

[5]BishnoiP, SarohaB, KumarS, et al., 2025. Click Chemistry: an overview and recent updates in the medicinal attributes of click-derived heterocycles. Mol Divers, in press.

[6]BordensteinSR, TheisKR, 2015. Host biology in light of the microbiome: ten principles of holobionts and hologenomes. PLoS Biol, 13(8):e1002226.

[7]BrackmanG, CoenyeT, 2015. Quorum sensing inhibitors as anti-biofilm agents. Curr Pharm Des, 21(1):5-11.

[8]CallawayE, 2024. ‘ChatGPT for CRISPR’ creates new gene-editing tools. Nature, 629(8011):272-272.

[9]CallawayE, 2025. Biggest-ever AI biology model writes DNA on demand. Nature, 638(8052):868-869.

[10]Cembrowska-LechD, KrzemińskaA, MillerT, et al., 2023. An integrated multi-omics and artificial intelligence framework for advance plant phenotyping in horticulture. Biology, 12(10):1298.

[11]ChenDM, LiRN, ShaoQ, et al., 2023. Design and synthesis of novel near-infrared fluorescence probes based on an open conformation of a cytochrome P450 1B1 complex for molecular imaging of colorectal tumors. J Med Chem, 66(23):16032-16050.

[12]ChenMM, KopittkePM, ZhaoFJ, et al., 2024. Applications and opportunities of click chemistry in plant science. Trends Plant Sci, 29(2):167-178.

[13]ChenSS, LuXQ, FangHD, et al., 2024. Early surveillance of rice bakanae disease using deep learning and hyperspectral imaging. aBIOTECH, 5(3):281-297.

[14]ChenY, WangJ, YangN, et al., 2018. Wheat microbiome bacteria can reduce virulence of a plant pathogenic fungus by altering histone acetylation. Nat Commun, 9:3429.

[15]ChengR, KeTL, GuiFZ, et al., 2025. drSMALL: database for disease resistance-shaping small molecules derived from the plant microbiome. Crop Health, 3:2.

[16]DullahS, HazarikaDJ, ParveenA, et al., 2021. Fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production. Mycology, 12(4):279-295.

[17]FanXY, MatsumotoH, XuHR, et al., 2024. Aspergillus cvjetkovicii protects against phytopathogens through interspecies chemical signalling in the phyllosphere. Nat Microbiol, 9(11):2862-2876.

[18]GandomiAH, ChenF, AbualigahL, 2023. Big data analytics using artificial intelligence. Electronics, 12(4):957.

[19]GaoCX, 2021. Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell, 184(6):1621-1635.

[20]GigerGH, ErnstC, RichterI, et al., 2024. Inducing novel endosymbioses by implanting bacteria in fungi. Nature, 635(8038):415-422.

[21]GongAD, WuNN, KongXW, et al., 2019. Inhibitory effect of volatiles emitted from Alcaligenes faecalis N1-4 on Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxins in storage. Front Microbiol, 10:1419.

[22]GuY, TianJJ, ZhangY, et al., 2021. Dissecting signal molecule AI-2 mediated biofilm formation and environmental tolerance in Lactobacillus plantarum. J Biosci Bioeng, 131(2):153-160.

[23]HacquardS, MartinFM, 2024. The chemical language of plant–microbe–microbe associations: an introduction to a virtual issue. New Phytol, 244(3):739-742.

[24]HanifMS, TayyabM, BailloEH, et al., 2024. Plant microbiome technology for sustainable agriculture. Front Microbiol, 15:1500260.

[25]HibbingME, FuquaC, ParsekMR, et al., 2010. Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat Rev Microbiol, 8(1):15-25.

[26]HoganDA, VikÅ, KolterR, 2004. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecule influences Candida albicans morphology. Mol Microbiol, 54(5):1212-1223.

[27]HuTT, FangHD, PanQQ, et al., 2024. Seed microbiome-mediated herbicide resistance evolution in weeds. New Phytol, 242(2):333-343.

[28]HussainM, ZahraN, LangT, et al., 2023. Integrating nanotechnology with plant microbiome for next-generation crop health. Plant Physiol Biochem, 196:703-711.

[29]JinPF, WangY, TanZ, et al., 2020. Antibacterial activity and rice-induced resistance, mediated by C₁₅ surfactin A, in controlling rice disease caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 169:104669.

[30]JonesJDG, StaskawiczBJ, DanglJL, 2024. The plant immune system: from discovery to deployment. Cell, 187(9):2095-2116.

[31]JumperJ, EvansR, PritzelA, et al., 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature, 596(7873):583-589.

[32]KatoH, NemotoK, ShimizuM, et al., 2022. Recognition of pathogen-derived sphingolipids in Arabidopsis. Science, 376(6595):857-860.

[33]KimothoRN, MainaS, 2024. Unraveling plant–microbe interactions: can integrated omics approaches offer concrete answers? J Exp Bot, 75(5):1289-1313.

[34]KolbHC, FinnMG, SharplessKB, 2001. Click chemistry: diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew Chem Int Ed, 40(11):2004-2021.

[35]KuYS, LiaoYJ, ChiouSP, et al., 2024. From trade-off to synergy: microbial insights into enhancing plant growth and immunity. Plant Biotechnol J, 22(9):2461-2471.

[36]LaschP, BeyerW, BoschA, et al., 2025. A MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry database for identification and classification of highly pathogenic bacteria. Sci Data, 12:187.

[37]LeachJE, TriplettLR, ArguesoCT, et al., 2017. Communication in the phytobiome. Cell, 169(4):587-596.

[38]LiBS, SunC, LiJY, et al., 2024. Targeted genome-modification tools and their advanced applications in crop breeding. Nat Rev Genet, 25(9):603-622.

[39]LiJB, WuPF, CaoZT, et al., 2024. Machine learning-based prediction models to guide the selection of Cas9 variants for efficient gene editing. Cell Rep, 43(2):113765.

[40]LiJC, JiangXF, 2021. Mol-BERT: an effective molecular representation with BERT for molecular property prediction. Wireless Commun Mobile Comput, 2021:7181815.

[41]LiRY, ChenSS, MatsumotoH, et al., 2023. Predicting rice diseases using advanced technologies at different scales: present status and future perspectives. aBIOTECH, 4(4):359-371.

[42]LiuXY, MatsumotoH, LvTX, et al., 2023. Phyllosphere microbiome induces host metabolic defence against rice false-smut disease. Nat Microbiol, 8(8):1419-1433.

[43]LotterhosKE, 2024. Principles in experimental design for evaluating genomic forecasts. Methods Ecol Evol, 15(9):1466-1482.

[44]LuoCH, HeYJ, ChenYP, 2025. Rhizosphere microbiome regulation: unlocking the potential for plant growth. Curr Res Microb Sci, 8:100322.

[45]LuoF, YuZJ, ZhouQ, et al., 2022. Multi-omics-based discovery of plant signaling molecules. Metabolites, 12(1):76.

[46]LvTX, ZhanCF, PanQQ, et al., 2023. Plant pathogenesis: toward multidimensional understanding of the microbiome. iMeta, 2(3):e129.

[47]MaierhabaY, MomjianC, MankelD, et al., 2024. Dual-BONCAT reveals distinct day- and night-active microbial populations in salt marsh sediments. bioRxiv, preprint.

[48]MatsumotoH, FanXY, WangY, et al., 2021. Bacterial seed endophyte shapes disease resistance in rice. Nat Plants, 7(1):60-72.

[49]MatsumotoH, QianY, FanXY, et al., 2022. Reprogramming of phytopathogen transcriptome by a non-bactericidal pesticide residue alleviates its virulence in rice. Fundam Res, 2(2):198-207.

[50]MidziJ, JefferyDW, BaumannU, et al., 2022. Stress-induced volatile emissions and signalling in inter-plant communication. Plants, 11(19):2566.

[51]MorimotoK, KrahnD, KaschaniF, et al., 2022. Broad-range metalloprotease profiling in plants uncovers immunity provided by defence-related metalloenzyme. New Phytol, 235(3):1287-1301.

[52]MullerE, ShiryanI, BorensteinE, 2024. Multi-omic integration of microbiome data for identifying disease-associated modules. Nat Commun, 15:2621.

[53]PanQQ, LvTX, XuHR, et al., 2024. Gut pathobiome mediates behavioral and developmental disorders in biotoxin-exposed amphibians. Environ Sci Ecotechnol, 21:100415.

[54]PantigosoHA, NewbergerD, VivancoJM, 2022. The rhizosphere microbiome: plant–microbial interactions for resource acquisition. J Appl Microbiol, 133(5):2864-2876.

[55]PaquetteSJ, ZaheerR, StanfordK, et al., 2018. Competition among Escherichia coli strains for space and resources. Vet Sci, 5(4):93.

[56]ReesHA, MinellaAC, BurnettCA, et al., 2021. CRISPR-derived genome editing therapies: progress from bench to bedside. Mol Ther, 29(11):3125-3139.

[57]RooneyLM, AmosWB, HoskissonPA, et al., 2020. Intra-colony channels in E. coli function as a nutrient uptake system. ISME J, 14(10):2461-2473.

[58]SharmaM, SudheerS, UsmaniZ, et al., 2020. Deciphering the omics of plant–microbe interaction: perspectives and new insights. Curr Genomics, 21(5):343-362.

[59]SlettenEM, BertozziCR, 2011. From mechanism to mouse: a tale of two bioorthogonal reactions. Acc Chem Res, 44(9):666-676.

[60]SrivastavaAK, SinghRD, PandeyGK, et al., 2025. Unravelling the molecular dialogue of beneficial microbe–plant interactions. Plant Cell Environ, 48(4):2534-2548.

[61]StukenbrockE, GurrS, 2023. Address the growing urgency of fungal disease in crops. Nature, 617(7959):31-34.

[62]SuP, KangHX, PengQZ, et al., 2024. Microbiome homeostasis on rice leaves is regulated by a precursor molecule of lignin biosynthesis. Nat Commun, 15:23.

[63]TanXH, WangDP, ZhangXW, et al., 2025. A pair of LysM receptors mediates symbiosis and immunity discrimination in Marchantia. Cell, 188(5):1330-1348.e27.

[64]TariqA, GuoSZ, FarhatF, et al., 2025. Engineering synthetic microbial communities: diversity and applications in soil for plant resilience. Agronomy, 15(3):513.

[65]TrivediP, LeachJE, TringeSG, et al., 2020. Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol, 18(11):607-621.

[66]UgaldeU, 2006. Autoregulatory signals in mycelial fungi. In: Kües U, Fischer R (Eds.), Growth, Differentiation and Sexuality, 2nd Ed. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, p.203-213.

[67]WangBY, ZhaoAS, NovickRP, et al., 2015. Key driving forces in the biosynthesis of autoinducing peptides required for staphylococcal virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 112(34):10679-10684.

[68]WangG, RanHM, FanJ, et al., 2022. Fungal-fungal cocultivation leads to widespread secondary metabolite alteration requiring the partial loss-of-function VeA1 protein. Sci Adv, 8(17):eabo6094.

[69]WangMC, CernavaT, 2020. Overhauling the assessment of agrochemical-driven interferences with microbial communities for improved global ecosystem integrity. Environ Sci Ecotechnol, 4:100061.

[70]WangMC, CernavaT, 2023. Soterobionts: disease-preventing microorganisms and proposed strategies to facilitate their discovery. Curr Opin Microbiol, 75:102349.

[71]WangPP, Lehti-ShiuMD, LotreckS, et al., 2024. Prediction of plant complex traits via integration of multi-omics data. Nat Commun, 15:6856.

[72]Weiland-BräuerN, 2021. Friends or foes—microbial interactions in nature. Biology, 10(6):496.

[73]WeiningerD, 1988. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 28(1):31-36.

[74]WhidbeyC, 2025. The right tool for the job: chemical biology and microbiome science. Cell Chem Biol, 32(1):83-97.

[75]WuL, LuoYB, 2021. Bacterial quorum-sensing systems and their role in intestinal bacteria-host crosstalk. Front Microbiol, 12:611413.

[76]XuP, FanXY, MaoYX, et al., 2022. Temporal metabolite responsiveness of microbiota in the tea plant phyllosphere promotes continuous suppression of fungal pathogens. J Adv Res, 39:49-60.

[77]XuP, StirlingE, XieHT, et al., 2023. Continental scale deciphering of microbiome networks untangles the phyllosphere homeostasis in tea plant. J Adv Res, 44:13-22.

[78]ZhanCF, WangMC, 2024. Disease resistance through M genes. Nat Plants, 10(3):352-353.

[79]ZhanCF, MatsumotoH, LiuYF, et al., 2022. Pathways to engineering the phyllosphere microbiome for sustainable crop production. Nat Food, 3(12):997-1004.

[80]ZhangGS, ZhangF, DingG, et al., 2012. Acyl homoserine lactone-based quorum sensing in a methanogenic archaeon. ISME J, 6(7):1336-1344.

[81]ZhangSB, MukherjiR, ChowdhuryS, et al., 2021. Lipopeptide-mediated bacterial interaction enables cooperative predator defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 118(6):e2013759118.

[82]ZhangXK, LiGJ, ZhangZQ, et al., 2023. 3-Octanol controls gray mold on postharvest fruit by inducing autophagy of Botrytis cinerea. Postharvest Biol Technol, 205:112525.

[83]ZhaoL, WalkowiakS, FernandoWGD, 2023. Artificial intelligence: a promising tool in exploring the phytomicrobiome in managing disease and promoting plant health. Plants, 12(9):1852.

[84]ZhouYQ, WangHK, XuSD, et al., 2022. Bacterial-fungal interactions under agricultural settings: from physical to chemical interactions. Stress Biol, 2:22.

[85]ZhuYL, FangYP, HuangWZ, et al., 2024. AI-driven precision subcellular navigation with fluorescent probes. J Mater Chem B, 12(43):11054-11062.