Similar articles

Abstract: emergency exercises are an efficient approach for preventing serious damage and harm, including loss of life and property and a wide range of adverse social effects, during various public emergencies. Among various factors affecting the value of emergency exercises, including their design, development, conduct, evaluation, and improvement planning, this paper emphasizes the focal role of evacuees and their behavior. We address two concerns: What are the intrinsic reasons behind human behavior? How do we model and exhibit human behavior? We review studies investigating the mechanisms of psychological behavior and crowd evacuation animation. A comprehensive analysis of logical patterns of behavior and crowd evacuation is presented first. The interactive effects of information (objective and subjective), psychology (panic, small groups, and conflicting roles), and six kinds of behavior contribute to a more effective understanding of an emergency scene and assist in making scientific decisions. Based on these studies, a wide range of perspectives on crowd formation and evacuation animation models is summarized. collision avoidance is underlined as a special topic. Finally, this paper highlights some of the technical challenges and key questions to be addressed by future developments in this rapidly developing field.

[1]Aguirre, B.E., 2005. Emergency evacuations, panic, and social psychology. Psych. Interpers. Biol. Processes, 68(2):121-129.

[2]An, S., Cui, N., Cui, J., 2010. Simulation of household gathering behaviors during emergency evacuation. J. South China Univ. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 38(10):94-99 (in Chinese).

[3]Blair, A.J., 2010. The Effect of Stair Width on Occupant Speed and Flow of High Rise Buildings. Fire Protection Engineering, Maryland, America.

[4]Bouvier, E., Cohen, E., 1995. Simulation of Human Flow with Particle Systems. Proc. Simulators Int. XII, p.349-354.

[5]Bouvier, E., Cohen, E., Najman, L., 1997. From crow simulation to airbag deployment: particle systems, a new paradigm of simulation. J. Electron. Imag., 6(1):94-107.

[6]Corradi, O., Hjorth, P.G., Starke, J., 2012. Equation-free detection and continuation of a Hopf bifurcation point in a particle model of pedestrian flow. SIAM J. Appl. Dynam. Syst., 11(3):1007-1032.

[7]Department of Homeland Security (DHS), 2013. Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). Available from https://hseep.dhs.gov/pages/1001_HSEE P10.aspx [Accessed on June 24, 2013].

[8]Dettinger, M., Ralph, F.M., Hughes, M., Das, T., Neiman, P., Cox, D., Estes, G., Reynolds, D., Hartman, R., Cayan, D., et al., 2012. Design and quantification of an extreme winter storm scenario for emergency preparedness and planning exercises in California. Nat. Hazards, 60(3):1085-1111.

[9]Durupinar, F., Pelechano, N., Allbeck, J.M., Gudukbay, U., Badler, N.I., 2011. How the ocean personality model affects the perception of crowds. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 31(3):22-31.

[10]Emergency Management Office of the State Council, 2009. Notice to Issue the Guidelines on Emergency Exercise. Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[11]Guo, Z., Qin, W., Shu, X., 2009. Simulation of virtual crowd behaviors in emergency. Comput. Technol. Devel., 19(6):47-51 (in Chinese).

[12]Hao, S., 2011. Research on Capability Evaluation Indicators of Government Emergency Management in the Public Emergency. Int. Conf. on E-Business and E-Government, p.1-5.

[13]He, G., Ou, W., Ma, M., Zhang, L., Hu, Q., Xu, Z., 2011. Virtual Emergency Rehearse System for Dangerous Gas Diffusion in Chemical Industry Park. Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry, p.455-458.

[14]Helbing, D., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T., 2000. Simulating dynamical feature of escape panic. Nature, 407(6803):487-490.

[15]Hughes, R.L., 2000. The flow of large crowds of pedestrians. Math. Comput. Simul., 53(4-6):367-370.

[16]Jiang, C.S., 2012. Method for evaluating evacuation exercise of office building. China Safety Sci. J., 22(5):170-176 (in Chinese).

[17]Kim, K., Kim, K.J., 2010. Multi-agent-based simulation system for construction operations with congested flows. Autom. Constr., 19(7):867-874.

[18]Kobes, M., Helsloot, I., Vries, B.D., Post, J.G., 2010. Building safety and human behaviour in fire: a literature review. Fire Safety J., 45(1):1-11.

[19]Li, J., Liu, Q., Yan, J., 2008. Study on behavioral process and models of emergency dynamic decision. Hebei Acad. J., 28(5):146-150 (in Chinese).

[20]Li, X., Hong, L., Xu, R., 2012. Influential factors of passengers’ psychology and behavior on subway station emergency evacuation. Urban Mass Trans., 15(4):54-57 (in Chinese).

[21]Liu, S., Liu, Z., Liu, C., Jiang, Z., Jiang, M., 2009. Analysis of conflicts of teachers’ roles and behaviors in case of emergency. Contemp. Teacher Educ., 2(3):86-91 (in Chinese).

[22]Liu, Z., Huang, P., 2012. Study of panic behavior model for crowd on pedestrian bridge in emergent event. J. Syst. Simul., 24(9):1-4 (in Chinese).

[23]Luo, L., Zhou, S., Cai, W., Low, M.Y.H., Tian, F., Wang, Y., 2008. Agent-based human behavior modeling for crowd simulation. Comput. Animat. Virt. Worlds, 19(3-4):271-281.

[24]Musse, S.R., Thalmann, D., 2001. Hierarchical model for real time simulation of virtual human crowds. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph., 7(2):152-164.

[25]Niederberger, C., Gross, M., 2003. Hierarchical and heterogeneous reactive agents for real-time applications. Comput. Graph. For., 22(3):323-331.

[26]Oguz, O., Akaydın, A., Yılmaz, T., Gudukbay, U., 2010. Emergency crowd simulation for out door environments. Comput. Graph., 34(2):136-144.

[27]Ondrej, J., Pettre, J., Olivier, A., Donikian, S., 2010. A synthetic-vision based steering approach for crowd simulation. ACM Trans. Graph., 29(4), Article 123.

[28]Parisi, D.R., Dorso, C.O., 2007. Morphological and dynamical aspects of the room evacuation process. Phys. A, 385(1):343-355.

[29]Pelechano, N., Allbeck, J.M., Badler, N.I., 2007. Controlling Individual Agents in High-Density Crowd Simulation. Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symp. on Computer Animation, p.99-108.

[30]Qiu, F., Hu, X., 2010. Modeling group structures in pedestrian crowd simulation. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, 18(2):190-205.

[31]Reynolds, C.W., 1987. Flocks, Herds and Schools: a Distributed Behavioral Model. Proc. 14th Annual Conf. on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, p.25-34.

[32]Seyfried, A., Steffen, B., Lippert, T., 2006. Basics of modelling the pedestrian flow. Phys. A, 368(1):232-238.

[33]Tian, Y., 2008. Research of crowd psychology and behavior law in panic situation. Chin. J. Ergon., 14(1):48-50 (in Chinese).

[34]Treuille, A., Cooper, S., Popovic, Z., 2006. Continuum crowds. ACM Trans. Graph., 25(3):1160-1168.

[35]Tsai, M.K., Lee, Y.C., Lu, C.H., Chen, M.H., Chou, T.Y., Yau, N.J., 2012. Integrating geographical information and augmented reality techniques for mobile escape guidelines on nuclear accident sites. J. Environ. Radio., 109:36-44.

[36]Wang, J.H., Lo, S.M., Sun, J.H., Wang, Q.S., Mu, H.L., 2012. Qualitative simulation of the panic spread in large-scale evacuation. Simulation, 88(12):1465-1474.

[37]Wang, P., Luh, P.B., Chang, S.C., Marsh, K.L., 2009. Efficient Optimization of Building Emergency Evacuation Considering Social Bond of Evacuees. IEEE Int. Conf. on Automation Science and Engineering, p.250-255.

[38]Zhang, J., Fu, G., Chen, N., Gao, S., Zhao, Y.G., 2012. Experimental study on the miners’ emergency handling ability. J. China Coal Soc., 37(2):290-294 (in Chinese).

[39]Zhao, L., Cheng, J., 2010. Study of individual behavior state in unconventional emergencies based on theory of catastrophe. China Safety Sci. J., 20(12):14-21 (in Chinese).

[40]Zhou, S., Chen, D., Cai, W., Luo, L., Low, M.Y.H., Tian, F., Tay, V.S.H., Ong, D.W.S., Hamilton, B.D., 2010. Crowd modeling and simulation technologies. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul., 20(4), Article 20, p.1-39.