ENGINEERING Information Technology & Electronic Engineering  2026 Vol.27 No.5 P.1-14

http://doi.org/10.1631/ENG.ITEE.2026.0005


High-precision temperature prediction for atmospheric refractivity correction using Kalman spatiotemporal data fusion


Author(s):  Ziru LI, Zhaobin XU, Tao ZHANG, Xinbo YUAN, Zhonghe JIN

Affiliation(s):  1. Micro-Satellite Research Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China more

Corresponding email(s):   zjuxzb@zju.edu.cn

Key Words:  Temperature prediction, Kalman filter expanded fusion (KFEF), Atmospheric refraction correction, Absolute distance measurement, Generalized regression neural network (GRNN) optimization


Ziru LI, Zhaobin XU, Tao ZHANG, Xinbo YUAN, Zhonghe JIN. High-precision temperature prediction for atmospheric refractivity correction using Kalman spatiotemporal data fusion[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science C, 2026, 27(5): 1-14.

@article{title="High-precision temperature prediction for atmospheric refractivity correction using Kalman spatiotemporal data fusion",
author="Ziru LI, Zhaobin XU, Tao ZHANG, Xinbo YUAN, Zhonghe JIN",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science C",
volume="27",
number="5",
pages="1-14",
year="2026",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/ENG.ITEE.2026.0005"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T High-precision temperature prediction for atmospheric refractivity correction using Kalman spatiotemporal data fusion
%A Ziru LI
%A Zhaobin XU
%A Tao ZHANG
%A Xinbo YUAN
%A Zhonghe JIN
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%V 27
%N 5
%P 1-14
%@ 1869-1951
%D 2026
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/ENG.ITEE.2026.0005

TY - JOUR
T1 - High-precision temperature prediction for atmospheric refractivity correction using Kalman spatiotemporal data fusion
A1 - Ziru LI
A1 - Zhaobin XU
A1 - Tao ZHANG
A1 - Xinbo YUAN
A1 - Zhonghe JIN
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
VL - 27
IS - 5
SP - 1
EP - 14
%@ 1869-1951
Y1 - 2026
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/ENG.ITEE.2026.0005


Abstract: 
In absolute distance measurement and positioning applications, atmospheric refraction error is a critical factor limiting measurement accuracy. Temperature plays a dominant role in computing the atmospheric refractive index. However, accurately acquiring the temperature field along the ranging path in complex and dynamic outdoor environments remains challenging due to limited sensor deployment and environmental nonstationarity. We propose a spatiotemporal temperature data fusion method for atmospheric refraction correction, which integrates the strengths of the generalized regression neural network (GRNN) and Kriging interpolation within a Kalman filter. This method achieves dynamic prediction and high-accuracy reconstruction of temperature parameters. The proposed method is systematically validated through simulation analysis as well as indoor and kilometer-scale outdoor experimental measurements. The simulation results demonstrate that kalman filter expanded fusion (KFEF) outperforms the traditional interpolation method radial basis function (RBF) and the state-of-the-art spatiotemporal interpolation and prediction methods spatiotemporal Kriging (STK) and Gaussian process (GP), in terms of both reconstruction accuracy and stability of the temperature field. Specifically, KFEF achieves a 61.54% reduction in root mean square error (RMSE) compared with RBF and reductions of 34.21% and 32.43% relative to STK and GP, respectively. This indicates its practical value for long-distance high-precision ranging engineering applications. Furthermore, the proposed spatiotemporal data fusion framework is highly general and scalable. It can also be applied to other temperature field prediction and reconstruction problems.

利用卡尔曼时空数据融合进行大气折射率修正下的温度高精度采集

李自茹1,2,3,徐兆斌1,2,3,张涛1,2,3,袁新博1,2,3,金仲和1,2,3
1浙江大学微小卫星研究中心,中国杭州市,310027
2浣江实验室,中国诸暨市,311899
3浙江省微纳卫星研究重点实验室,中国杭州市,310027
摘要:在绝对距离测量与定位应用中,大气折射误差是制约测量精度的关键因素,其中温度参数对大气折射率的计算具有主导作用。然而,在野外复杂、动态的环境中,由于传感器布设数量有限且环境具有非平稳性,沿测距路径精准获取温度场仍存在较大难度。针对上述问题,本文提出一种面向大气折射修正的温度时空数据融合方法,在卡尔曼滤波框架下融合广义回归神经网络(GRNN)与克里金插值的优势,实现温度参数的动态预测与高精度重构。通过仿真分析以及室内和公里级室外实测实验对所提方法进行了系统验证。仿真结果表明,卡尔曼滤波扩展融合方法(KFEF)在温度场重构精度与稳定性方面均优于传统插值方法径向基神经网络(RBF)和先进的时空插值预测方法时空克里金(STK)和高斯过程回归(GP):相较于RBF,均方根误差(RMSE)降低了61.54%;相较于STK和GP,RMSE分别降低了34.21%和32.43%。这表明该方法在长距离高精度测距工程应用中具有良好的实用价值。此外,所提出的时空数据融合框架具有高度通用性和可扩展性,同样适用于其他温度场预测与重建问题。

关键词:温度预测;卡尔曼滤波扩展融合(KFEF);大气折射修正;绝对距离测量;广义回归神经网络优化

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]Anggraeni W, Yuniarno EM, Rachmadi RF, et al., 2024. A hybrid EMD-GRNN-PSO in intermittent time-series data for dengue fever forecasting. Expert Syst Appl, 237:121438.

[2]Bi TF, Li XL, Chen WB, 2024. LiDAR saturated waveform compensation-based real-time ranging method for traffic sign detection. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 73:8504011.

[3]Chauhan MS, Ojeda-Tuz M, Catarelli RA, et al., 2024. On active learning for Gaussian process-based global sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 245:109945.

[4]Chen KQ, Liu EB, Deng M, et al., 2024. DKNN: deep Kriging neural network for interpretable geospatial interpolation. Int J Geogr Inform Sci, 38(8):1486-1530.

[5]Chen Y, Li JS, Miao DJ, et al., 2018. Development of outdoor baseline environment parameters measurement system based on sensor array. Acta Metrol Sin, 39(4):455-460 (in Chinese).

[6]Cheng K, Papaioannou I, Lyu M, et al., 2025. State space Kriging model for emulating complex nonlinear dynamical systems under stochastic excitation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 442:117987.

[7]Cheng K, Papaioannou I, Lyu M, et al., 2026. State space Kriging model for emulating nonlinear stochastic dynamical systems with parameter uncertainty. Mech Syst Signal Process, 243:113691.

[8]Ciddor PE, 1996. Refractive index of air: new equations for the visible and near infrared. Appl Opt, 35(9):1566.

[9]Ding YP, Huang GW, Hu JB, et al., 2020. Indoor target tracking using dual-frequency continuous-wave radar based on the range-only measurements. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 69(8):5385-5394.

[10]Duff CM, Crawford J, Ip RHL, et al., 2025. Using spacetime geostatistical analysis to improve precipitation isoscape interpolation in Australia. J Hydrol, 650:132502.

[11]Erdogan Erten G, Yavuz M, Deutsch CV, 2022. Combination of machine learning and Kriging for spatial estimation of geological attributes. Nat Resour Res, 31(1):191-213.

[12]Ghritlahre HK, Prasad RK, 2018. Investigation of thermal performance of unidirectional flow porous bed solar air heater using MLP, GRNN, and RBF models of ANN technique. Therm Sci Eng Prog, 6:226-235.

[13]Golpîra H, Bevrani H, Golpîra H, 2011. Application of GA optimization for automatic generation control design in an interconnected power system. Energy Conv Manag, 52(5):2247-2255.

[14]Gu YY, Jiang LX, Wang L, et al., 2019. Comparative study on thermometry methods of outdoor baseline. Geom Spat Inform Technol, 42(12):27-30 (in Chinese).

[15]Guillory J, Truong D, Wallerand JP, et al., 2024. A sub-millimetre two-wavelength EDM that compensates the air refractive index: uncertainty and measurements up to 5 km. Meas Sci Technol, 35(2):025024.

[16]Janowicz K, Gao S, McKenzie G, et al., 2020. GeoAI: spatially explicit artificial intelligence techniques for geographic knowledge discovery and beyond. Int J Geogr Inform Sci, 34(4):625-636.

[17]Katzfuss M, Stroud JR, Wikle CK, 2020. Ensemble Kalman methods for high-dimensional hierarchical dynamic space-time models. J Am Stat Assoc, 115(530):866-885.

[18]Lee S, Kim SB, 2020. Parallel simulated annealing with a greedy algorithm for Bayesian network structure learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 32(6):1157-1166.

[19]Li G, Liu ZY, Li JG, et al., 2018. Application of general regression neural network to model a novel integrated fluidized bed gasifier. Int J Hydr Energy, 43(11):5512-5521.

[20]Li S, Griffith DA, Shu H, 2020. Temperature prediction based on a space–time regression-Kriging model. J Appl Stat, 47(7):1168-1190.

[21]Liu EB, Chen KQ, Deng M, 2025. ST-KrigingNet: deep spatiotemporal Kriging neural network for multivariate and nonstationary spatiotemporal interpolation. Int J Geogr Inform Sci, 40(6):1807-1839.

[22]Liu XD, Miao DJ, Zhang JY, et al., 2020. Development of environmental parameters automatic measurement system for 1.2 km standard baseline. Acta Metrol Sin, 41(8):897-902 (in Chinese).

[23]Meiners-Hagen K, Meyer T, Mildner J, et al., 2017. SI-traceable absolute distance measurement over more than 800 meters with sub-nanometer interferometry by two-color inline refractivity compensation. Appl Phys Lett, 111(19):191104.

[24]Miao C, Wang Y, 2024. Interpolation of non-stationary geo-data using Kriging with sparse representation of covariance function. Comput Geotech, 169:106183.

[25]Nourani V, Ghaffari A, Behfar N, et al., 2024. Spatiotemporal assessment of groundwater quality and quantity using geostatistical and ensemble artificial intelligence tools. J Environ Manag, 355:120495.

[26]Pisani M, Astrua M, Zucco M, 2018. An acoustic thermometer for air refractive index estimation in long distance interferometric measurements. Metrologia, 55(1):67-74.

[27]Pollinger F, Meyer T, Beyer J, et al., 2012. The upgraded PTB 600 m baseline: a high-accuracy reference for the calibration and the development of long distance measurement devices. Meas Sci Technol, 23(9):094018.

[28]Rooki R, 2016. Application of general regression neural network (GRNN) for indirect measuring pressure loss of Herschel–Bulkley drilling fluids in oil drilling. Measurement, 85:184-191.

[29]Rüeger JM, 2002. Refractive index formulae for radio waves. Proc FIG XXII Int Congress, p.1-13.

[30]Shi ZC, Zhou XG, 2021. Spatio-temporal dynamic fields estimating and modeling of missing points in data sets using a flexible state-space model. Appl Sci, 11(19):9050.

[31]Srinivasan BV, Duraiswami R, Murtugudde R, 2010. Efficient Kriging for real-time spatio-temporal interpolation. Proc 20th Conf on Probability and Statistics in the Atmospheric Sciences, p.228-235.

[32]Tobler WR, 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr, 46(S1):234-240.

[33]Tomberg T, Fordell T, Jokela J, et al., 2017. Spectroscopic thermometry for long-distance surveying. Appl Opt, 56(2):239-246.

[34]Underwood R, Gardiner T, Finlayson A, et al., 2015. A combined non‐contact acoustic thermometer and infrared hygrometer for atmospheric measurements. Meteor Appl, 22(S1):830-835.

[35]Varouchakis EA, Theodoridou PG, Karatzas GP, 2019. Spatiotemporal geostatistical modeling of groundwater levels under a Bayesian framework using means of physical background. J Hydrol, 575:487-498.

[36]Wang LC, Kisi O, Zounemat-Kermani M, et al., 2016. Solar radiation prediction using different techniques: model evaluation and comparison. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 61:384-397.

[37]Wang SZ, Cao JN, Yu PS, 2022. Deep learning for spatio-temporal data mining: a survey. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 34(8):3681-3700.

[38]Webster R, Oliver MA, 2007. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

[39]Wu HZ, Zhao T, Wang ZY, et al., 2017. Long distance measurement up to 1.2 km by electro-optic dual-comb interferometry. Appl Phys Lett, 111(25):251901.

[40]Xu XY, Zhang ZQ, Zhang HY, et al., 2020. Long distance measurement by dynamic optical frequency comb. Opt Expr, 28(4):4398-4411.

[41]Zhao MC, Wang CH, Jin ZH, 2013. Design and derivation of the dual transponder carrier ranging system. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci C (Comput & Electron), 14(5):383-394.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Full Text:   <2>

Summary:  <2>

CLC number: TP274

On-line Access: 2026-05-27

Received: 2026-01-05

Revision Accepted: 2026-04-07

Crosschecked: 2026-05-27

Cited: 0

Clicked: 4

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

 ORCID:

Ziru LI

0009-0007-9038-5651

Zhaobin XU

0000-0003-3059-8974

Zhonghe JIN

0000-0002-2039-1390

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE