Similar articles

Abstract: Since only one inverter voltage vector is applied during each duty cycle, traditional model predictive direct power control (MPDPC) for grid-connected inverters (GCIs) results in serious harmonics in current and power. Moreover, a high sampling frequency is needed to ensure satisfactory steady-state performance, which is contradictory to its long execution time due to the iterative prediction calculations. To solve these problems, a novel dead-beat MPDPC strategy is proposed, using two active inverter voltage vectors and one zero inverter voltage vector during each duty cycle. Adoption of three inverter vectors ensures a constant switching frequency. Thus, smooth steady-state performance of both current and power can be obtained. Unlike the traditional three-vector based MPDPC strategy, the proposed three vectors are selected based on the power errors rather than the sector where the grid voltage vector is located, which ensures that the duration times of the selected vectors are positive all the time. Iterative calculations of the cost function in traditional predictive control are also removed, which makes the proposed strategy easy to implement on digital signal processors (DSPs) for industrial applications. Results of experiments based on a 1 kW inverter setup validate the feasibility of the proposed three-vector based dead-beat MPDPC strategy.

用于并网逆变器的改进三矢量无差拍模型预测直接功率控制策略

[1]Aguilera RP, Quevedo DE, Vazquez S, et al., 2013. Generalized predictive direct power control for AC/DC converters. Proc IEEE ECCE Asia Downunder, p.1215-1220.

[2]Blasko V, Kaura V, 1997. A new mathematical model and control of a three-phase AC-DC voltage source converter. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 12(1):116-123. https://doi.org/10.1109/63.554176

[3]Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang SS, et al., 2017. Impedance-phased dynamic control method for grid-connected inverters in a weak grid. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 32(1):274-283.

[4]Cheng CW, Nian H, Wang XH, et al., 2017. Dead-beat predictive direct power control of voltage source inverters with optimized switching patterns. IET Power Electron, 10(12):1438-1451.

[5]Choi DK, Lee KB, 2015. Dynamic performance improvement of AC/DC converter using model predictive direct power control with finite control set. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 62(2):757-767.

[6]Cortes P, Rodriguez J, Quevedo DE, et al., 2008a. Predictive current control strategy with imposed load current spectrum. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 23(2):612-618.

[7]Cortes P, Rodriguez J, Antoniewicz P, et al., 2008b. Direct power control of an AFE using predictive control. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 23(5):2516-2523.

[8]Dekka A, Wu B, Yaramasu V, et al., 2017. Model predictive control with common-mode voltage injection for modular multilevel converter. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 32(3): 1767-1778.

[9]Fang H, Zhang ZB, Feng XY, et al., 2016. Ripple-reduced model predictive direct power control for active front-end power converters with extended switching vectors and time-optimised control. IET Power Electron, 9(9):1914- 1923.

[10]Golestan S, Guerrero JR, Vasquez JC, 2017. Three-phase PLLs: a review of recent advances. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 32(3):1894-1907.

[11]Hu JB, 2013. Improved dead-beat predictive DPC strategy of grid-connected dc-ac converters with switching loss minimization and delay compensations. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 9(2):728-738.

[12]Hu JB, Zhu ZQ, 2013. Improved voltage-vector sequences on dead-beat predictive direct power control of reversible three-phase grid-connected voltage-source converters. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 28(1):254-267.

[13]Larrinaga SA, Vidal MAR, Oyarbide E, et al., 2007. Predictive control strategy for DC/AC converters based on direct power control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 54(3):1261- 1271.

[14]Malinowiski M, 2001. Sensorless control strategies for three- phase PWM rectifiers. PhD Thesis, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.

[15]Rodriguez JR, Dixon JW, Espinoza JR, et al., 2005. PWM regenerative rectifiers: state of the art. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 52(1):5-22.

[16]Song ZF, Chen W, Xia CL, 2014. Predictive direct power control for three-phase grid-connected converters without sector information and voltage vector selection. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 29(10):5518-5531.

[17]Vargas R, Cortes P, Ammann U, et al., 2007. Predictive control of a three-phase neutral-point-clamped inverter. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 54(5):2697-2705.

[18]Vazquez S, Marquez A, Aguilera R, et al., 2015. Predictive optimal switching sequence direct power control for grid- connected power converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 62(4):2010-2020.

[19]Zeng Z, Li H, Tang SQ, et al., 2016. Multi-objective control of multi-functional grid-connected inverter for renewable energy integration and power quality service. IET Power Electron, 9(4):761-770.

[20]Zhang YC, Zhu JG, 2011. A novel duty cycle control strategy to reduce both torque and flux ripples for DTC of permanent magnet synchronous motor drives with switching frequency reduction. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 26(10): 3055-3067.

[21]Zhang YC, Xie W, Li ZX, et al., 2013. Model predictive direct power control of a PWM rectifier with duty cycle optimization. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 28(11):5343-5351.

[22]Zhang YC, Xie W, Li ZX, et al., 2014. Low-complexity model predictive power control: double-vector-based approach. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 61(11):5871-5880.

[23]Zhang YC, Peng YB, Yang HT, 2016. Performance improvement of two-vector-based model predictive control of PWM rectifier. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 31(8): 6016-6030.

[24]Zhao QS, Ye YQ, Xu GF, et al., 2016. Improved repetitive control scheme for grid-connected inverter with frequency adaptation. IET Power Electron, 9(5):883-890.