Full Text:
<2253>
Summary: 
<1616>
CLC number: TN973.3
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2019-07-12
Cited: 0
Clicked: 6636
A novel algorithm to counter cross-eye jamming based on a multi-target model
| ||||||||||||||
Zhi-yong Song, Xing-lin Shen, Qiang Fu. A novel algorithm to counter cross-eye jamming based on a multi-target model[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2019, 20(7): 988-1001.
@article{title="A novel algorithm to counter cross-eye jamming based on a multi-target model",
author="Zhi-yong Song, Xing-lin Shen, Qiang Fu",
journal="Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering",
volume="20",
number="7",
pages="988-1001",
year="2019",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/FITEE.1800394"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T A novel algorithm to counter cross-eye jamming based on a multi-target model
%A Zhi-yong Song
%A Xing-lin Shen
%A Qiang Fu
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%V 20
%N 7
%P 988-1001
%@ 2095-9184
%D 2019
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/FITEE.1800394
TY - JOUR
T1 - A novel algorithm to counter cross-eye jamming based on a multi-target model
A1 - Zhi-yong Song
A1 - Xing-lin Shen
A1 - Qiang Fu
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
VL - 20
IS - 7
SP - 988
EP - 1001
%@ 2095-9184
Y1 - 2019
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/FITEE.1800394
Abstract: cross-eye jamming is an electronic attack technique that induces an angular error in the monopulse radar by artificially creating a false target and deceiving the radar into detecting and tracking it. Presently, there is no effective anti-jamming method to counteract cross-eye jamming. In our study, through detailed analysis of the jamming mechanism, a multi-target model for a cross-eye jamming scenario is established within a random finite set framework. A novel anti-jamming method based on multi-target tracking using probability hypothesis density filters is subsequently developed by combining the characteristic differences between target and jamming with the releasing process of jamming. The characteristic differences between target and jamming and the releasing process of jamming are used to optimize particle partitioning. particle identity labels that represent the properties of target and jamming are introduced into the detection and tracking processes. The release of cross-eye jamming is detected by estimating the number of targets in the beam, and the distinction between true targets and false jamming is realized through correlation and transmission between labels and estimated states. Thus, accurate tracking of the true targets is achieved under severe jamming conditions. Simulation results showed that the proposed method achieves a minimum delay in detection of cross-eye jamming and an accurate estimation of the target state.
[1]Bai K, Wang YH, 2013. Millimeter-wave radar and IR fusion anti-jamming method based on the analysis of target activities. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol (Nat Sci Ed), 41(S1):163-166 (in Chinese).
[2]Beard M, Reuter S, Granström K, et al., 2016. Multiple extended target tracking with labeled random finite sets. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 64(7):1638-1653.
[3]Bryant DS, Vo BT, Vo BN, et al., 2018. A generalized labeled multi-Bernoulli filter with object spawning. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 66(23):6177-6189.
[4]Clark DE, Bell J, 2007. Multi-target state estimation and track continuity for the particle PHD filter. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 43(4):1441-1453.
[5]du Plessis WP, 2012. Platform skin return and retrodirective cross-eye jamming. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 48(1):490-501.
[6]du Plessis WP, 2016. Path-length effects in multiloop retrodirective cross-eye jamming. IEEE Antenn Wirel Propag Lett, 15:626-629.
[7]du Plessis WP, Odendaal JW, Joubert J, 2009. Extended analysis of retrodirective cross-eye jamming. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag, 57(9):2803-2806.
[8]du Plessis WP, Odendaal JW, Joubert J, 2011. Experimental simulation of retrodirective cross-eye jamming. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 47(1):734-740.
[9]Fantacci C, Papi F, 2016. Scalable multisensor multitarget tracking using the marginalized δ-GLMB density. IEEE Signal Process Lett, 23(6):863-867.
[10]Hong S, Wang L, Shi ZG, et al., 2011. Simplified particle PHD filter for multiple-target tracking: algorithm and architecture. Prog Electromagn Res, 120:481-498.
[11]KRET, 2014. Missiles are not a problem: the SAP 518 jamming station protects fighter jets from guided missiles. http://www.kret.com/en/news/3544/
[12]Li J, Shen W, 2015. Analysis of anti-jamming capability of multistatic radar system under different interference rules. Acta Armam, 36(S2):178-185 (in Chinese).
[13]Li TC, Sun SD, Corchado JM, et al., 2014. A particle dyeing approach for track continuity for the SMC-PHD filter. Proc 17th IEEE Int Conf on Information Fusion, p.1-8.
[14]Li TC, Corchado JM, García J, et al., 2016. MEAP: approximate optimal estimate extraction for the SMC-PHD filter. Proc 19th IEEE Int Conf on Information Fusion, p.2309-2316.
[15]Li TC, Corchado JM, Sun SD, et al., 2017. Multi-EAP: extended EAP for multi-estimate extraction for SMC-PHD filter. Chin J Aeronaut, 30(1):368-379.
[16]Li XR, Jilkov VP, 2003. Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part I. Dynamic models. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 39(4):1333-1364.
[17]Li YZ, Hu WQ, Chen X, et al., 2013. Research on polarization discrimination algorithm for coherent dual-source angle deception interference. Acta Armam, 34(9):1078-1083 (in Chinese).
[18]Lin L, Bar-Shalom Y, Kirubarajan T, 2006. Track labeling and PHD filter for multitarget tracking. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 42(3):778-795.
[19]Mahler RPS, 2003. Multitarget Bayes filtering via first-order multitarget moments. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 39(4):1152-1178.
[20]Mahler RPS, 2007. Statistical Multisource Multitarget Information Fusion. Artech House, Norwood, MA, USA, p.194-211.
[21]Mahler RPS, 2014. Advances in Statistical Multisource-Multitarget Information Fusion. Artech House, Norwood, MA, USA, p.307-329.
[22]Papi F, Vo BN, Vo BT, et al., 2015. Generalized labeled multi-Bernoulli approximation of multi-object densities. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 63(20):5487-5497.
[23]Reuter S, Vo BT, Vo BN, et al., 2014. The labeled multi-Bernoulli filter. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 62(12):3246-3260.
[24]Schuhmacher D, Vo BT, Vo BN, 2008. A consistent metric for performance evaluation of multi-object filters. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 56(8):3447-3457.
[25]Shi ZG, Zheng Y, Bian X, et al., 2013. Threshold-based resampling for high-speed particle PHD filter. Prog Electromagn Res, 136:369-383.
[26]Ulmke M, Erdinc O, Willett P, 2007. Gaussian mixture cardinalized PHD filter for ground moving target tracking. Proc 10th Int Conf on Information Fusion, p.1-8.
[27]Vo BN, Sing S, Doucet A, 2005. Sequential Monte Carlo methods for multi-target filtering with random finite sets. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 41(4):1224-1245.
[28]Vo BT, 2008. Random Finite Sets in Multi-object Filtering. PhD Thesis, University of Western Australia, Australia, p.127-144.
[29]Vo BT, Vo BN, 2013. Labeled random finite sets and multi-object conjugate priors. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 61(13):3460-3475.
[30]Vo BT, Vo BN, Cantoni A, 2007. Analytic implementations of the cardinalized probability hypothesis density filter. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 55(7):3553-3567.
[31]Vo BT, Vo BN, Cantoni A, 2008. Bayesian filtering with random finite set observations. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 56(4):1313-1326.
[32]Vo BT, Vo BN, Cantoni A, 2009. The cardinality balanced multi-target multi-Bernoulli filter and its implementations. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 57(2):409-423.
[33]Wu W, Wang GH, Liu Y, et al., 2011. Airborne radar/IRST/ ESM synergistic tracking and management. Syst Eng Electron, 33(7):1517-1522 (in Chinese).
[34]Xiao HT, Li YX, Fu Q, 2015. Identification and tracking of towed decoy and aircraft using multiple-model improved labeled P-PHD filter. Dig Signal Process, 46:49-58.
[35]Xue D, Dong WF, Gao JM, et al., 2011. Performance analysis of time-domain discrimination technique of ARUAV on countering three active sources. Radar Sci Technol, 9(6):496-501.
[36]Zhao SS, Zhang LR, Zhou Y, et al., 2014. Measurement fusion method against false-target jamming for radar network. J Univ Electron Sci Technol China, 43(2):207-211.
ORCID: 
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>