Similar articles

Abstract: With the rapid development of data-driven intelligent transportation systems, an efficient route recommendation method for taxis has become a hot topic in smart cities. We present an effective taxi route recommendation approach (called APFD) based on the artificial potential field (APF) method and dijkstra method with mobile trajectory big data. Specifically, to improve the efficiency of route recommendation, we propose a region extraction method that searches for a region including the optimal route through the origin and destination coordinates. Then, based on the APF method, we put forward an effective approach for removing redundant nodes. Finally, we employ the dijkstra method to determine the optimal route recommendation. In particular, the APFD approach is applied to a simulation map and the real-world road network on the Fourth Ring Road in Beijing. On the map, we randomly select 20 pairs of origin and destination coordinates and use APFD with the ant colony (AC) algorithm, greedy algorithm (A∗), APF, rapid-exploration random tree (RRT), non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and dijkstra for the shortest route recommendation. Compared with AC, A∗, APF, RRT, NSGA-II, and PSO, concerning shortest route planning, APFD improves route planning capability by 1.45%–39.56%, 4.64%–54.75%, 8.59%–37.25%, 5.06%–45.34%, 0.94%–20.40%, and 2.43%–38.31%, respectively. Compared with dijkstra, the performance of APFD is improved by 1.03–27.75 times in terms of the execution efficiency. In addition, in the real-world road network, on the Fourth Ring Road in Beijing, the ability of APFD to recommend the shortest route is better than those of AC, A∗, APF, RRT, NSGA-II, and PSO, and the execution efficiency of APFD is higher than that of the dijkstra method.

APFD：面向移动轨迹大数据的出租车路径推荐方法

[1]Agarwal D, Bharti PS, 2020. Nature inspired evolutionary approaches for robot navigation: survey. J Inform Optim Sci, 41(2):421-436.

[2]Ajeil FH, Ibraheem IK, Sahib MA, et al., 2020. Multi-objective path planning of an autonomous mobile robot using hybrid PSO-MFB optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput, 89:106076.

[3]Akram M, Habib A, Alcantud JCR, 2021. An optimization study based on Dijkstra algorithm for a network with trapezoidal picture fuzzy numbers. Neur Comput Appl, 33(4):1329-1342.

[4]Algfoor ZA, Sunar MS, Abdullah A, 2017. A new weighted pathfinding algorithms to reduce the search time on grid maps. Expert Syst Appl, 71:319-331.

[5]Danilovic M, Vasiljevic D, Cvetic B, 2021. A novel pseudo-polynomial approach for shortest path problems. Networks, 78(2):107-127.

[6]He ZC, Chen KY, Chen XY, 2018. A collaborative method for route discovery using taxi drivers’ experience and preferences. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 19(8):2505-2514.

[7]Hoy M, Matveev AS, Savkin AV, 2015. Algorithms for collision-free navigation of mobile robots in complex cluttered environments: a survey. Robotica, 33(3):463-497.

[8]Huang Y, Ying JJC, Yu PS, et al., 2021. Dynamic graph mining for multi-weight multi-destination route planning with deadlines constraints. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data, 15(1):3.

[9]Ji SG, Wang ZY, Li TR, et al., 2020. Spatio-temporal feature fusion for dynamic taxi route recommendation via deep reinforcement learning. Knowl-Based Syst, 205:106302.

[10]Jiao ZQ, Ma K, Rong YL, et al., 2018. A path planning method using adaptive polymorphic ant colony algorithm for smart wheelchairs. J Comput Sci, 25:50-57.

[11]Kou CX, Hu DD, Yuan JH, et al., 2020. Bisection and exact algorithms based on the Lagrangian dual for a single-constrained shortest path problem. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw, 28(1):224-233.

[12]Lai YX, Lv Z, Li KC, et al., 2019. Urban traffic Coulomb’s law: a new approach for taxi route recommendation. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 20(8):3024-3037.

[13]Lin BL, Zhao YN, Lin RX, et al., 2021. Integrating traffic routing optimization and train formation plan using simulated annealing algorithm. Appl Math Modell, 93:811-830.

[14]Mac TT, Copot C, Tran DT, et al., 2016. Heuristic approaches in robot path planning: a survey. Rob Auton Syst, 86:13-28.

[15]Mavrovouniotis M, Li CH, Yang SX, 2017. A survey of swarm intelligence for dynamic optimization: algorithms and applications. Swarm Evol Comput, 33:1-17.

[16]Nazarahari M, Khanmirza E, Doostie S, 2019. Multi-objective multi-robot path planning in continuous environment using an enhanced genetic algorithm. Expert Syst Appl, 115:106-120.

[17]Nimmagadda MR, Dattawadkar S, Muthukumar S, et al., 2020. Adaptive directional path planner for real-time, energy-efficient, robust navigation of mobile robots. Proc IEEE Int Conf on Robotics and Automation, p.455-461.

[18]Parimala M, Broumi S, Prakash K, et al., 2021. Bellman–Ford algorithm for solving shortest path problem of a network under picture fuzzy environment. Compl Intell Syst, 7(5):2373-2381.

[19]Przybylski A, Gandibleux X, 2017. Multi-objective branch and bound. Eur J Oper Res, 260(3):856-872.

[20]Qin GY, Li TN, Yu B, et al., 2017. Mining factors affecting taxi drivers’ incomes using GPS trajectories. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 79:103-118.

[21]Qu BT, Yang WX, Cui G, et al., 2020. Profitable taxi travel route recommendation based on big taxi trajectory data. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 21(2):653-668.

[22]Rizk Y, Awad M, Tunstel EW, 2018. Decision making in multiagent systems: a survey. IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst, 10(3):514-529.

[23]Santos FA, Rodrigues DO, Silva TH, et al., 2018. Context-aware vehicle route recommendation platform: exploring open and crowdsourced data. Proc IEEE Int Conf on Communications, p.1-7.

[24]Schaller Consulting, 2006. The New York City Taxicab Fact Book. Schaller Consulting, Brooklyn, UK.

[25]Sharma K, Doriya R, 2020. Path planning for robots: an elucidating draft. Int J Intell Robot Appl, 4(3):294-307.

[26]Sinyukov DA, Padir T, 2020. CWave: theory and practice of a fast single-source any-angle path planning algorithm. Robotica, 38(2):207-234.

[27]Wang JK, Meng MQH, 2020. Optimal path planning using generalized Voronoi graph and multiple potential functions. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 67(12):10621-10630.

[28]Wang JK, Chi WZ, Li CM, et al., 2020. Neural RRT^*: learning-based optimal path planning. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng, 17(4):1748-1758.

[29]Wang YS, Zheng XP, Chen W, et al., 2021. Robust and accurate optimal transportation map by self-adaptive sampling. Front Inform Technol Electron Eng, 22(9):1207-1220.

[30]Wu N, Wang JY, Zhao WX, et al., 2019. Learning to effectively estimate the travel time for fastest route recommendation. Proc 28^th ACM Int Conf on Information and Knowledge Management, p.1923-1932.

[31]Wu TQ, Yao M, Yang JH, 2016. Dolphin swarm algorithm. Front Inform Technol Electron Eng, 17(8):717-729.

[32]Yang SY, Ning LJ, Tong LC, et al., 2021. Optimizing electric vehicle routing problems with mixed backhauls and recharging strategies in multi-dimensional representation network. Expert Syst Appl, 176:114804.

[33]Zajac S, Huber S, 2021. Objectives and methods in multi-objective routing problems: a survey and classification scheme. Eur J Oper Res, 290(1):1-25.

[34]Zhang XJ, Jia W, Guan XM, et al., 2019. Optimized deployment of a radar network based on an improved firefly algorithm. Front Inform Technol Electron Eng, 20(3):425-437.

[35]Zhang Y, Li LL, Lin HC, et al., 2019. Development of path planning approach using improved A-star algorithm in AGV system. J Int Technol, 20(3):915-924.

[36]Zhu DD, Sun JQ, 2021. A new algorithm based on Dijkstra for vehicle path planning considering intersection attribute. IEEE Access, 9:19761-19775.