Full Text:
<2608>
CLC number: TP391
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 0
Clicked: 5349
The qualitative advantages of quantities of information: bigger is better
| |||||||||||||
LESK Michael. The qualitative advantages of quantities of information: bigger is better[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2005, 6(11): 1169-1178.
@article{title="The qualitative advantages of quantities of information: bigger is better",
author="LESK Michael",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="6",
number="11",
pages="1169-1178",
year="2005",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2005.A1169"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T The qualitative advantages of quantities of information: bigger is better
%A LESK Michael
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 6
%N 11
%P 1169-1178
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2005
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2005.A1169
TY - JOUR
T1 - The qualitative advantages of quantities of information: bigger is better
A1 - LESK Michael
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 6
IS - 11
SP - 1169
EP - 1178
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2005
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2005.A1169
Abstract: Digitization projects should focus on quantity rather than quality. Increasing quantities of information produce qualitatively more valuable services. Online writing and searching are now common, and it is only online reading that is still limiting our use of online books. New interfaces might increase our willingness to read online, which should be encouraged rather than fought, since it represents an increase both the amount of information available and the participation of more people in the writing and exchange of information.
[1] AES (Audio Engineering Society), 2002. Recommendation for Delivery of Recorded Music Projects. http://www.aes.org/technical/documents/AESTD1002.1.03-10_1.pdf.
[2] Anderson, C., 2004. The Long Tail. WIRED, Oct. 2004.
[3] Anderson, D.P., Cobb, J., Korpela, E., Lebofsky, M., Werthimer, D., 2002. SETI@home: an experiment in public-resource computing. Commun. ACM, 45(11):56-61.
[4] Egan, D.E., Lesk, M.E., Ketchum, R.D., Lochbaum, C.C., Remde, J.R., Littman, M., Landauer, T.K., 1991. Hypertext for the Electronic Library? CORE Sample Results. Hypertext 91, Proc. 3rd Annual ACM Conference on Hypertext, San Antonio, p.299-312.
[5] Franks, C., Sutherland, J., 2005. http://www.pgdp.net (Distributed Proofreaders’ site).
[6] Friess, S., 2002. The Web Didn’t Kill Libraries. Christian Science Monitor, July 25, 2002.
[7] Gorman, M., 2004. Google and God’s Mind. Los Angeles Times, Dec. 17, 2004.
[8] Irvine, I., 1996. Quoted by Jim Milliot in “Publishers still searching for profits in new media.” Publishers Weekly, 243(1):22.
[9] Jauslin, J.F., 2005. Statement by European Librarians on the Web at http://www.hasgard.net/article.php3?id_article=668.
[10] Jeanneney, J.N., 2005. See Agence-France Press, April 28, 2005.
[11] Lenstra, A., Manasse, M., 1990. Factoring by Electronic Mail. In: Advances in Cryptology. EUROCRYPT’89, p.355-371.
[12] Lesk, M., 1997. Practical Digital Libraries: Books, Bytes and Bucks. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
[13] Lesk, M., 2004. Understanding Digital Libraries Morgan Kaufmann (2nd Edition of the 1997 Book). San Francisco.
[14] McCarthy, J., 1899. Modern England Before the Reform Bill. T. Fisher Unwin, London.
[15] Rosenthal, M., 2005. North American Book Market. http://www.fonerbooks.com/booksale.htm.
[16] Titmuss, R., 1970. The Gift Relationship. Allen & Unwin, London.
[17] Wikipedia, 2005. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia (it seems only fair to cite their own article about themselves, although there are now many others).
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>