Similar articles

Abstract: This paper discribes a data representation for wordNet 2.1 based on ontology Language (OWL)%29&ck%5B%5D=abstract&ck%5B%5D=keyword'>web ontology Language (OWL). The main components of wordNet database are transformed as classes in OWL, and the relations between synsets or lexcial words are transformed as OWL properties. Our conversion is based on the data file of wordNet instead of the Prolog database. This work can be used to enrich the work in progress of standard conversion of wordNet to the RDF/OWL representation at W3C.

[1] Aref, M.M., Zhou, Z., 2005. The Ontology Web Language (OWL) for a Multi-Agent Understating System. Proc. IEEE Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems. IEEE Computer Society, Waltham, USA, p.586-590.

[2] Assem, M.V., Gangemi, A., Schreiber, G., 2006. Conversion of WordNet to a Standard RDF/OWL Representation. Proc. 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Genoa, Italy, p.237-242.

[3] Bansal, A., Kona, S., Simon, L., Mallya, A., Gupta, G., Hite, T.D., 2005. A Universal Service-Semantics Description Language. Proc. 3rd European Conference on Web Services. IEEE Computer Society, p.1-12.

[4] Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O., 2001. The semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5):34-43.

[5] Brickley, D., Guha, R.V., 2004. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. Http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema, W3C.

[6] Ciorascu, C., Ciorascu, L., Stoffel, K., 2003. knOWLer— Ontological Support for Information Retrieval Systems. Proc. 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, Workshop on Semantic Web. Toronto, Canada.

[7] Daly, J.J., Forgue, M.C., Hirakawa, Y., 2004. World Wide Web Consortium Issues RDF and OWL Recommendations. Http://www.w3.org/2004/01/sws-pressrelease.html.en,W3C.

[8] Fellbaum, C., 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge.

[9] Francopoulo, G., George, M., Calzolari, N., Monachini, M., Bel, N., Pet, M., Soria, C., 2006. LMF for Multilingual Specialized Lexicons. LREC Workshop on Acquiring and Representing Multilingual, Specialized Lexicons: The Case of Biomedicine. Genova, Italy, p.27-32.

[10] Graves, A., Gutierrez, C., 2006. Data Representation for WordNet: A Case for RDF. Proc. 3rd Global WordNet Association Conference. Jeju Island, Korea.

[11] Hayes, P., 2004. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Semantics. Http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-mt-20040210/, W3C.

[12] Hendler, J., 2001. Agents and the semantic Web. IEEE Intell. Syst., 16(2):30-37.

[13] Horrocks, I., 2002. DAML+OIL: a description logic for the semantic Web. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 25(1):4-9.

[14] Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., 2005. A Tableaux Decision Procedure for SHIOQ. Proc. 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufman, p.448-453.

[15] Huang, X.X., Zhou, C.L., 2005. A Logical Approach for Metaphor Understanding. Proc. 2005 IEEE International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Wuhan, China, p.268-271.

[16] Klyne, G., Carroll, J., 2004. Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concept and Abstract Syntax. Http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/, W3C.

[17] Lin, D., 1998. Dependency-based Evaluation of MINIPAR. Proc. Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing Systems. Granada, Spain, p.298-312.

[18] Miller, G.A., Hristea, F., 2006. WordNet nouns: classes and instances. Computational Linguistics, 32(1):1-3.

[19] Takenobu, T., Sornlertlamvanich, V., Charoenporn, T., Calzolari, N., Monachini, M., Soria, C., Huang, C.R., Xia, Y.J., Yu, H., Prevot, L., et al., 2006. Infrastructure for Standardization of Asian Language Resources. Proc. COLING/ACL 2006 Main Conference Poster Sessions. Association for Computational Linguistics. Sydney, Australia, p.827-834.

[20] Yergeau, F., Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., Maler, E., 2004. eXtensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. Http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/, W3C.