JZUS - Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2019 Vol.20 No.1 P.36-49

Continuum damage modeling and progressive failure analysis of a Type III composite vessel by considering the effect of autofrettage

Author(s): Bin-bin Liao, Dong-liang Wang, Li-yong Jia, Jin-yang Zheng, Chao-hua Gu
Affiliation(s): Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; more
Corresponding email(s): jyzh@zju.edu.cn
Key Words: Composite vessel, Damage evolution behaviors, Hashin failure criteria, Finite element analysis (FEA)

Share this article to： More <<< Previous Article \|Next Article >>>

Abstract: This paper aims to study the damage mechanisms and mechanical responses of a Type III composite vessel by considering the effect of autofrettage. Firstly, damage models using hashin failure criteria and 3D strain-based damage evolution laws for composite layers are implemented by implicit finite element codes using ABAQUS-UMAT (user material subroutine module). Secondly, the appropriate autofrettage pressure is determined by finite element analysis (FEA), in which the fiber stress ratio and the generated residual stress in the aluminium liner are investigated according to the related regulations. Finally, the effects of the autofrettage process on the internal pressure-displacement curves and damage evolution behaviors for matrix and fiber are discussed. For a composite vessel after autofrettage, the stresses in the composite layers and aluminium liner are also explored. Results show that the progressive damage evolution behaviors of the composite vessel with autofrettage and without autofrettage are basically consistent except there is some difference during the unloading process and the repressurization process in respect of matrix damage.

考虑自增强影响的III型复合材料气瓶连续损伤模拟及渐进失效分析

目的:成型后的金属内胆复合材料气瓶,即III型复合材料气瓶(以下简称气瓶),需采用自紧工艺来提高疲劳寿命. 最佳自紧压力是自紧工艺的重要参数. 本文旨在建立确定最佳自紧压力和气瓶渐进失效的有限元方法,研究自紧后气瓶纤维和基体损伤演化规律,并探讨自紧后气瓶复合材料层和金属内衬层的应力变化.
创新点:1. 建立针对三维气瓶的Hashin失效准则和指数型损伤演化的渐进失效模型,并通过ABAQUS-UMAT隐式有限元方法确定气瓶最佳自紧压力; 2. 通过渐进失效分析,揭示自紧后的气瓶纤维和基体损伤的损伤演化规律,并阐明自紧对气瓶渐进失效的影响.
方法:1. 基于连续损伤力学,建立三维Hashin失效准则和指数型损伤演化的渐进失效理论模型; 2. 通过ABAUQS-UMAT二次开发用户子程序实现渐进失效理论模型,并开展气瓶渐进失效计算; 3. 通过平板拉伸算例以及与气瓶试验数据对比,验证模型的准确性.
结论:1. 基体损伤首先出现在螺旋层,而纤维损伤首先出现在环向层. 2. 除了自紧后的泄压阶段和自紧后重新加压至压力值等于自紧压力的升压阶段,有无自紧的气瓶损伤演化规律基本一致; 而在上述泄压和升压阶段,基体损伤保持不变,说明经过自紧后的气瓶在工作压力下存在基体损伤. 3. 当内压压力低于自紧压力时,自紧工艺才会影响气瓶应力分布; 且随着压力的升高,基体损伤不变,内衬应力减少,纤维应力增加; 此外,经过自紧的气瓶在工作压力下最大环向和轴向内衬应力减少且出现在筒体部分的两端.
关键词：复合材料气瓶; 损伤演化行为; Hashin失效准则; 有限元分析

Reference

[1]Bakaiyan H, Hosseini H, Ameri E, 2009. Analysis of multi-layered filament-wound composite pipes under combined internal pressure and thermomechanical loading with thermal variations. Composite Structures, 88(4):532-541.

[2]DOT (Department of Transportation), 2007. Basic Requirements for Fully Wrapped Carbon-fiber Reinforced Aluminum Lined Cylinders, DOT-CFFC. DOT, USA.

[3]Francescato P, Gillet A, Leh D, et al., 2012. Comparison of optimal design methods for type 3 high-pressure storage tanks. Composite Structures, 94(6):2087-2096.

[4]Gentilleau B, Villalonga S, Nony F, et al., 2015. A probabilistic damage behavior law for composite material dedicated to composite pressure vessel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(38):13160-13164.

[5]Hashin Z, 1981. Fatigue failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 48(4):846-852.

[6]Hashin Z, Rotem A, 1973. A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials. Journal of Composite Materials, 7(4):448-464.

[7]Hong JH, Han MG, Chang SH, 2014. Safety evaluation of 70 MPa-capacity type III hydrogen pressure vessel considering material degradation of composites due to temperature rise. Composite Structures, 113:127-133.

[8]Hu J, Chandrashekhara K, 2009. Fracture analysis of hydrogen storage composite cylinders with liner crack accounting for autofrettage effect. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(8):3425-3435.

[9]Huang CH, Lee YJ, 2003. Experiments and simulation of the static contact crush of composite laminated plates. Composite Structures, 61(3):265-270.

[10]Jahromi BH, Ajdari A, Nayeb-Hashemi H, et al., 2010. Autofrettage of layered and functionally graded metal– ceramic composite vessels. Composite Structures, 92(8):1813-1822.

[11]Ju J, Pickle BD, Morgan RJ, et al., 2007. An initial and progressive failure analysis for cryogenic composite fuel tank design. Journal of Composite Materials, 41(21):2545-2568.

[12]Kim CU, Kang JH, Hong CS, et al., 2005. Optimal design of filament wound structures under internal pressure based on the semi-geodesic path algorithm. Composite Structures, 67(4):443-452.

[13]Kim DH, Jung KH, Lee IG, et al., 2017. Three-dimensional progressive failure modeling of glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites for impact simulation. Composite Structures, 176:757-767.

[14]Lapczyk I, Hurtado JA, 2007. Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 38(11):2333-2341.

[15]Li DH, Liu Y, Zhang X, 2014. Low-velocity impact responses of the stiffened composite laminated plates based on the progressive failure model and the layerwise/solid-elements method. Composite Structures, 110:249-275.

[16]Liu PF, Xu P, Zheng JY, 2009. Artificial immune system for optimal design of composite hydrogen storage vessel. Computational Materials Science, 47(1):261-267.

[17]Liu PF, Chu JK, Hou SJ, et al., 2012a. Micromechanical damage modeling and multiscale progressive failure analysis of composite pressure vessel. Computational Materials Science, 60:137-148.

[18]Liu PF, Chu JK, Hou SJ, et al., 2012b. Numerical simulation and optimal design for composite high-pressure hydrogen storage vessel: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(4):1817-1827.

[19]Liu PF, Chu JK, Liu YL, et al., 2012c. A study on the failure mechanisms of carbon fiber/epoxy composite laminates using acoustic emission. Materials & Design, 37:228-235.

[20]Liu PF, Xing LJ, Zheng JY, 2014. Failure analysis of carbon fiber/epoxy composite cylindrical laminates using explicit finite element method. Composites Part B: Engineering, 56:54-61.

[21]Liu PF, Liao BB, Jia LY, et al., 2016. Finite element analysis of dynamic progressive failure of carbon fiber composite laminates under low velocity impact. Composite Structures, 149:408-422.

[22]Onder A, Sayman O, Dogan T, et al., 2009. Burst failure load of composite pressure vessels. Composite Structures, 89(1):159-166.

[23]Puck A, Schürmann H, 2002. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Composites Science and Technology, 62(12-13):1633-1662.

[24]Rafiee R, Reshadi F, 2014. Simulation of functional failure in GRP mortar pipes. Composite Structures, 113:155-163.

[25]Rafiee R, Amini A, 2015. Modeling and experimental evaluation of functional failure pressures in glass fiber reinforced polyester pipes. Computational Materials Science, 96:579-588.

[26]Rafiee R, Fakoor M, Hesamsadat H, 2015a. The influence of production inconsistencies on the functional failure of GRP pipes. Steel and Composite Structures, 19(6):1369-1379.

[27]Rafiee R, Reshadi F, Eidi S, 2015b. Stochastic analysis of functional failure pressures in glass fiber reinforced polyester pipes. Materials & Design, 67:422-427.

[28]Son DS, Chang SH, 2012. Evaluation of modeling techniques for a type III hydrogen pressure vessel (70 MPa) made of an aluminum liner and a thick carbon/epoxy composite for fuel cell vehicles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(3):2353-2369.

[29]Son DS, Hong JH, Chang SH, 2012. Determination of the autofrettage pressure and estimation of material failures of a Type III hydrogen pressure vessel by using finite element analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(17):12771-12781.

[30]Tan W, Falzon BG, Chiu LNS, et al., 2015. Predicting low velocity impact damage and compression-after-impact (CAI) behaviour of composite laminates. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 71:212-226.

[31]Tsai SW, Wu EM, 1971. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. Journal of Composite Materials, 5(1):58-80.

[32]Vasiliev VV, Krikanov AA, Razin AF, 2003. New generation of filament-wound composite pressure vessels for commercial applications. Composite Structures, 62(3-4):449-459.

[33]Wang L, Zheng CX, Luo HY, et al., 2015. Continuum damage modeling and progressive failure analysis of carbon fiber/epoxy composite pressure vessel. Composite Structures, 134:475-482.

[34]Xia M, Takayanagi H, Kemmochi K, 2001. Analysis of multi-layered filament-wound composite pipes under internal pressure. Composite Structures, 53(4):483-491.

[35]Xiao FQ, Wu YZ, Zheng JY, et al., 2017. A load-holding time prediction method based on creep strain relaxation for the cold-stretching process of S30408 cryogenic pressure vessels. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 18(3):871-881.

[36]Xu P, Zheng JY, Chen HG, et al., 2010. Optimal design of high pressure hydrogen storage vessel using an adaptive genetic algorithm. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(7):2840-2846.

[37]Zheng CX, Yang F, Zhu AS, 2009. Mechanical analysis and reasonable design for Ti-Al alloy liner wound with carbon fiber resin composite high pressure vessel. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 10(3):384-391.

[38]Zheng CX, Wang L, Li R, et al., 2013. Fatigue test of carbon epoxy composite high pressure hydrogen storage vessel under hydrogen environment. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 14(6):393-400.

[39]Zheng JY, Liu PF, 2008. Elasto-plastic stress analysis and burst strength evaluation of Al-carbon fiber/epoxy composite cylindrical laminates. Computational Materials Science, 42(3):453-461.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Similar articles

- Go to

考虑自增强影响的III型复合材料气瓶连续损伤模拟及渐进失效分析

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference