Similar articles

Abstract: Intelligent maintenance of roads and highways requires accurate deterioration evaluation and performance prediction of asphalt pavement. To this end, we develop a time series long short-term memory (LSTM) model to predict key performance indicators (PIs) of pavement, namely the international roughness index (IRI) and rutting depth (RD). Subsequently, we propose a comprehensive performance indicator for the pavement quality index (PQI), which leverages the highway performance assessment standard method, entropy weight method, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. This indicator can evaluate the overall performance condition of the pavement. The data used for the model development and analysis are extracted from tests on two full-scale accelerated test tracks, called MnRoad and RIOHTrack. Six variables are used as predictors, including temperature, precipitation, total traffic volume, asphalt surface layer thickness, pavement age, and maintenance condition. Furthermore, wavelet denoising is performed to analyze the impact of missing or abnormal data on the LSTM model accuracy. In comparison to a traditional autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMAX) model, the proposed LSTM model performs better in terms of PI prediction and resiliency to noise. Finally, the overall prediction accuracy of our proposed performance indicator PQI is 93.8%.

基于时序长短期记忆模型的道路路面性能预测

[1]AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 2012. Pavement Management Guide. 2nd Edition. AASHTO, Washington, USA.

[2]AbazaKA, 2016. Back-calculation of transition probabilities for Markovian-based pavement performance prediction models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17(3):253-264.

[3]AbdelazizN, Abd El-HakimRT, El-BadawySM, et al., 2020. International roughness index prediction model for flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21(1):88-99.

[4]AlaviSH, SennKA, 1999. Development of New Pavement Design Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL). Report No. FHWA-AZ-99-455, Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, USA.

[5]AlbuquerqueFS, NúñezWP, 2011. Development of roughness prediction models for low-volume road networks in northeast Brazil. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2205(1):198-205.

[6]Al-SuleimanTI, ShiyabAMS, 2003. Prediction of pavement remaining service life using roughness data—case study in Dubai. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 4(2):121-129.

[7]BontempiG, TaiebSB, le BorgneYA, 2012. Machine Learning Strategies for Time Series Forecasting. In: Aufaure MA, Zimányi E (Eds.), Business Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, Germany.

[8]BoxGEP, JenkinsGM, 1970. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, San Francisco, USA.

[9]ChoiJH, AdamsTM, BahiaHU, 2004. Pavement roughness modeling using back-propagation neural networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 19(4):295-303.

[10]ChoiS, DoM, 2019. Development of the road pavement deterioration model based on the deep learning method. Electronics, 9(1):3.

[11]DongYS, ShaoYX, LiXT, et al., 2019. Forecasting pavement performance with a feature fusion LSTM-BPNN model. Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, p.1953-1962.

[12](UDOT.‍S. Department of Transportation), 2022. MnRoad Mainline–Interstate 94. Federal Highway Administration. https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/MnRoad/Map_Main#

[13]FangMJ, HanCJ, XiaoY, et al., 2020. Prediction modelling of rutting depth index for asphalt pavement using de-noising method. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21(7):895-907.

[14]GongHR, SunYR, MeiZJ, et al., 2018. Improving accuracy of rutting prediction for mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide with deep neural networks. Construction and Building Materials, 190:710-718.

[15]HintonGE, SalakhutdinovRR, 2006. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313(5786):504-507.

[16]Justo-SilvaR, FerreiraA, FlintschG, 2021. Review on machine learning techniques for developing pavement performance prediction models. Sustainability, 13(9):5248.

[17]KaloopMR, El-BadawySM, AhnJ, et al., 2022. A hybrid wavelet-optimally-pruned extreme learning machine model for the estimation of international roughness index of rigid pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23(3):862-876.

[18]KayRK, MahoneyJP, JacksonNC, 1993. The WSDOT Pavement Management System—a 1993 Update. Report No. WA-RD 274.1, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, USA.

[19]LiS, FanMM, XuLK, et al., 2021. Rutting performance of semi-rigid base pavement in RIOHTrack and laboratory evaluation. Frontiers in Materials, 7:590604.

[20]LiW, JuHY, XiaoLY, et al., 2019. International roughness index prediction based on multigranularity fuzzy time series and particle swarm optimization. Expert Systems with Applications: X, 2:100006.

[21]LiZ, ZhangJP, LiuT, et al., 2021. Using PSO-SVR algorithm to predict asphalt pavement performance. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 35(6):04021094.

[22]MarcelinoP, de Lurdes AntunesM, FortunatoE, et al., 2021. Machine learning approach for pavement performance prediction. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22(3):341-354.

[23]OwolabiAO, SadiqOM, AbiolaOS, 2012. Development of performance models for a typical flexible road pavement in Nigeria. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 2(3):178-184.

[24]Pérez-AceboH, Linares-UnamunzagaA, RojiE, et al., 2020. IRI performance models for flexible pavements in two-lane roads until first maintenance and/or rehabilitation work. Coatings, 10(2):97.

[25]RobbinsMM, TranNH, 2016. A Synthesis Report: Value of Pavement Smoothness and Ride Quality to Roadway Users and the Impact of Pavement Roughness on Vehicle Operating Costs. NCAT Report No. 16-03, National Center for Asphalt Technology at Auburn University, Auburn, USA.

[26]SayersMW, GillespieTD, QueirozCA, 1986. International Experiment to Establish Correlations and Standard Calibration Methods for Road Roughness Measurement. Technical Report No. 45, World Bank, Washington, USA.

[27]SchwarzG, 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2):461-464.

[28]StankeL, KubicekJ, VilimekD, et al., 2020. Towards to optimal wavelet denoising scheme‍–a novel spatial and volumetric mapping of wavelet-based biomedical data smoothing. Sensors, 20(18):5301.

[29]TabatabaeeN, ZiyadiM, ShafahiY, 2013. Two-stage support vector classifier and recurrent neural network predictor for pavement performance modeling. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 19(3):266-274.

[30]ValenciaD, OrejuelaD, SalazarJ, et al., 2016. Comparison analysis between Rigrsure, Sqtwolog, Heursure and Minimaxi techniques using hard and soft thresholding methods. Proceedings of the 21st Symposium on Signal Processing, Images and Artificial Vision.

[31]YaoLY, DongQ, JiangJW, et al., 2019. Establishment of prediction models of asphalt pavement performance based on a novel data calibration method and neural network. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(1):66-82.

[32]ZaghloulS, HelaliK, BekheetW, 2006. Development and Implementation of Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Pavement Management System (PMS). Report No. FHWA-AZ-06-494, Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, USA.

[33]ZhaoJN, WangH, LuP, 2022. Impact analysis of traffic loading on pavement performance using support vector regression model. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23(11):3716-3728.