CLC number:
On-line Access: 2025-06-25
Received: 2024-01-23
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-17
Crosschecked: 2025-06-25
Cited: 0
Clicked: 1315
Zhigang SHAN, Mengxia SONG, Jiapeng PAN, Baolong ZHANG, Miaojun SUN, Fang HE. Hydrodynamic characteristics of a wind turbine monopile foundation integrated with an oscillating water column wave energy device[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2025, 26(6): 499-511.
@article{title="Hydrodynamic characteristics of a wind turbine monopile foundation integrated with an oscillating water column wave energy device",
author="Zhigang SHAN, Mengxia SONG, Jiapeng PAN, Baolong ZHANG, Miaojun SUN, Fang HE",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="26",
number="6",
pages="499-511",
year="2025",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A2400045"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Hydrodynamic characteristics of a wind turbine monopile foundation integrated with an oscillating water column wave energy device
%A Zhigang SHAN
%A Mengxia SONG
%A Jiapeng PAN
%A Baolong ZHANG
%A Miaojun SUN
%A Fang HE
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 26
%N 6
%P 499-511
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2025
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2400045
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hydrodynamic characteristics of a wind turbine monopile foundation integrated with an oscillating water column wave energy device
A1 - Zhigang SHAN
A1 - Mengxia SONG
A1 - Jiapeng PAN
A1 - Baolong ZHANG
A1 - Miaojun SUN
A1 - Fang HE
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 26
IS - 6
SP - 499
EP - 511
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2025
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2400045
Abstract: We explore the incorporation of an oscillating water column (OWC) device into a monopile foundation designed for offshore wind power generation. The hydrodynamic characteristics of the structure are investigated, including the free water surface and air pressure response inside the OWC chamber, the wave energy capture performance, and the wave load response under various power take-off (PTO) damping and wave conditions. An orifice is employed to represent the quadratic PTO damping effect. Results indicate that increasing the PTO opening ratio increases the peak frequency of the water surface oscillation coefficient inside the OWC chamber, as well as the OWC pneumatic power. The load-reduction effect of the OWC device in the positive direction is likely related to the water surface oscillation inside the chamber and the wave energy extraction efficiency. At high wave frequencies, the water surface oscillation coefficient is relatively small, while the pneumatic power remains at a large value, and the OWC device can effectively reduce wave loads in the direction of incoming waves. The optimal opening ratio of 1.51% may balance wave energy utilization efficiency with structural protection for the device.
[1]AndersenJ, AbrahamsenR, AndersenTL, et al., 2020. Wave load mitigation by perforation of monopiles. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(5):352.
[2]BoccottiP, FilianotiP, FiammaV, et al., 2007. Caisson breakwaters embodying an OWC with a small opening—part II: a small-scale field experiment. Ocean Engineering, 34(5-6):820-841.
[3]ChangG, JonesCA, RobertsJD, et al., 2018. A comprehensive evaluation of factors affecting the levelized cost of wave energy conversion projects. Renewable Energy, 127:344-354.
[4]ChenJ, WenHJ, WangYX, et al., 2020. Experimental investigation of an annular sector OWC device incorporated into a dual cylindrical caisson breakwater. Energy, 211:118681.
[5]CongPW, TengB, BaiW, et al., 2021. Wave power absorption by an oscillating water column (OWC) device of annular cross-section in a combined wind-wave energy system. Applied Ocean Research, 107:102499.
[6]ElhanafiA, KimCJ, 2018. Experimental and numerical investigation on wave height and power take-off damping effects on the hydrodynamic performance of an offshore–stationary OWC wave energy converter. Renewable Energy, 125:518-528.
[7]FalcãoAFO, HenriquesJCC, 2016. Oscillating-water-column wave energy converters and air turbines: a review. Renewable Energy, 85:1391-1424.
[8]HayatiM, NiksereshtAH, HaghighiAT, 2020. Sequential optimization of the geometrical parameters of an OWC device based on the specific wave characteristics. Renewable Energy, 161:386-394.
[9]HeF, HuangZH, 2014. Hydrodynamic performance of pile-supported OWC-type structures as breakwaters: an experimental study. Ocean Engineering, 88:618-626.
[10]HeF, HuangZH, 2016. Using an oscillating water column structure to reduce wave reflection from a vertical wall. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 142(2):04015021.
[11]HeF, HuangZH, 2017. Characteristics of orifices for modeling nonlinear power take-off in wave-flume tests of oscillating water column devices. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 18(5):329-345.
[12]HeF, HuangZH, LawAWK, 2012. Hydrodynamic performance of a rectangular floating breakwater with and without pneumatic chambers: an experimental study. Ocean Engineering, 51:16-27.
[13]HeF, HuangZH, LawAWK, 2013. An experimental study of a floating breakwater with asymmetric pneumatic chambers for wave energy extraction. Applied Energy, 106:222-231.
[14]HeF, LiMJ, HuangZH, 2016. An experimental study of pile-supported OWC-type breakwaters: energy extraction and vortex-induced energy loss. Energies, 9(7):540.
[15]HeF, LengJ, ZhaoXZ, 2017. An experimental investigation into the wave power extraction of a floating box-type breakwater with dual pneumatic chambers. Applied Ocean Research, 67:21-30.
[16]HeF, ZhangHS, ZhaoJJ, et al., 2019. Hydrodynamic performance of a pile-supported OWC breakwater: an analytical study. Applied Ocean Research, 88:326-340.
[17]HeF, LiuYB, PanJP, et al., 2023a. Advanced ocean wave energy harvesting: current progress and future trends. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 24(2):91-108.
[18]HeF, LinY, PanJP, et al., 2023b. Experimental investigation of vortex evolution around oscillating water column wave energy converter using particle image velocimetry. Physics of Fluids, 35(1):015151.
[19]HoweD, NaderJR, MacfarlaneG, 2020. Performance analysis of a floating breakwater integrated with multiple oscillating water column wave energy converters in regular and irregular seas. Applied Ocean Research, 99:102147.
[20]KooW, 2009. Nonlinear time–domain analysis of motion-restrained pneumatic floating breakwater. Ocean Engineering, 36(9-10):723-731.
[21]KuoYS, ChungCY, HsiaoSC, et al., 2017. Hydrodynamic characteristics of oscillating water column caisson breakwaters. Renewable Energy, 103:439-447.
[22]LeeJH, KwakTY, JeongYJ, et al., 2023. A study on the lateral load capacity of a novel hybrid monopile via a centrifuge model test. Energies, 16(21):7234.
[23]LiYN, LiuSZ, XuCL, et al., 2022. Experimental study on the cylindrical oscillating water column device. Ocean Engineering, 246:110523.
[24]LiuZQ, FanSL, WangYZ, et al., 2021. Genetic-algorithm-based layout optimization of an offshore wind farm under real seabed terrain encountering an engineering cost model. Energy Conversion and Management, 245:114610.
[25]LiuJB, SongDR, LiQA, et al., 2023. Life cycle cost modelling and economic analysis of wind power: a state of art review. Energy Conversion and Management, 277:116628.
[26]MaHW, YangJ, 2020. A novel hybrid monopile foundation for offshore wind turbines. Ocean Engineering, 198:106963.
[27]MicheleS, RenziE, Perez-CollazoC, et al., 2019. Power extraction in regular and random waves from an OWC in hybrid wind-wave energy systems. Ocean Engineering, 191:106519.
[28]Perez-CollazoC, GreavesD, IglesiasG, 2018. Hydrodynamic response of the WEC sub-system of a novel hybrid wind-wave energy converter. Energy Conversion and Management, 171:307-325.
[29]QuM, YuDY, DouZH, et al., 2021. Design and experimental study of a pile-based breakwater integrated with OWC chamber. China Ocean Engineering, 35(3):443-453.
[30]RamG, SaadMR, Zainal AbidinN, et al., 2022. Hydrodynamic performance of a hybrid system of a floating oscillating water column and a breakwater. Ocean Engineering, 264:112463.
[31]SchopfW, 2009. Flow Load Controlling Mechanism for Tower of Offshore-Wind Turbine i.e. Monopile, Has Tower Arranged with Flow Resistance-Favorable Surface Structure Such That Sea Current Exerts Smaller Horizontal Forces on Tower. German Patent DE102008008760-A1.
[32]ShengWN, 2019. Wave energy conversion and hydrodynamics modelling technologies: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 109:482-498.
[33]ShiXL, LiangBC, DuST, et al., 2022. Wave energy assessment in the china east adjacent seas based on a 25-year wave-current interaction numerical simulation. Renewable Energy, 199:1381-1407.
[34]ZhaoXL, LiY, ZouQP, et al., 2022. Long wave absorption by a dual purpose Helmholtz resonance OWC breakwater. Coastal Engineering, 178:104203.
[35]ZhengSM, ZhangYL, IglesiasG, 2019. Coast/breakwater-integrated OWC: a theoretical model. Marine Structures, 66:121-135.
[36]ZhengSM, AntoniniA, ZhangYL, et al., 2020a. Hydrodynamic performance of a multi-oscillating water column (OWC) platform. Applied Ocean Research, 99:102168.
[37]ZhengSM, ZhuGX, SimmondsD, et al., 2020b. Wave power extraction from a tubular structure integrated oscillating water column. Renewable Energy, 150:342-355.
[38]ZhouY, NingDZ, ShiW, et al., 2020. Hydrodynamic investigation on an OWC wave energy converter integrated into an offshore wind turbine monopile. Coastal Engineering, 162:103731.
[39]ZhuGX, GrahamD, ZhengSM, et al., 2020. Hydrodynamics of onshore oscillating water column devices: a numerical study using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Ocean Engineering, 218:108226.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>