Similar articles

Abstract: When only a portion of the shield lining structures in a full-line tunnel are overloaded, their bearing and failure characteristics are significantly different from those in the full-line overloaded case. In existing studies, one or several segmental lining rings have been studied, with overload applied to selected lining rings to analyze the performance evolution of the lining structures; however, this approach fails to reveal the bearing and failure characteristics of shield lining rings under localized overload. To address this research gap, we employ 3D finite element modeling to investigate the mechanical performance and failure mechanisms of shield segmental linings under localized overload conditions, and compare the results with full-line overload scenarios. Additionally, the impact of reinforcing shield segmental linings with steel rings is studied to address issues arising from localized overloads. The results indicate that localized overloads lead to significant ring joint dislocation and higher stress on longitudinal bolts, potentially causing longitudinal bolt failure. Furthermore, the overall deformation of lining rings, segmental joint opening, and stress in circumferential bolts and steel bars is lower compared to full-line overloads. For the same overload level, the convergence deformation of the lining under full-line overload is 1.5 to 2.0 times higher than that under localized overload. For localized overload situations, a reinforcement scheme with steel rings spanning across two adjacent lining rings is more effective than installing steel rings within individual lining rings. This spanning ring reinforcement strategy not only enhances the structural rigidity of each ring, but also limits joint dislocation and reduces stress on longitudinal bolts, with the reduction in maximum ring joint dislocation ranging from 70% to 82% and the reduction in maximum longitudinal bolt stress ranging from 19% to 57% compared to reinforcement within rings.

局部超载作用下盾构隧道管片衬砌破坏特性与加固效果数值模拟分析

[1]ArnauO, MolinsC, 2015. Theoretical and numerical analysis of the three-dimensional response of segmental tunnel linings subjected to localized loads. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 49:384-399.

[2]ChenRP, ChenS, WuHN, et al., 2020. Investigation on deformation behavior and failure mechanism of a segmental ring in shield tunnels based on elaborate numerical simulation. Engineering Failure Analysis, 117:104960.

[3]ElbadyA, MousaS, MohamedHM, et al., 2023. Effect of test parameters on the punching-shear strength of precast tunnel segments reinforced with GFRP bars. Engineering Structures, 297:117016.

[4]GaoBY, ChenRP, WuHN, et al., 2024. Investigation of mechanical failure performance of a large-diameter shield tunnel segmental ring. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 25(5):411-428.

[5]HuM, WuBJ, ZhouWB, et al., 2022. Self-driving shield: intelligent systems, methodologies, and practice. Automation in Construction, 139:104326.

[6]KannangaraKKPM, DingZ, ZhouWH, 2022. Surface settlements induced by twin tunneling in silty sand. Underground Space, 7(1):58-75.

[7]LiZ, LiuXZ, LaiHR, et al., 2023. Detailed damage mechanism of deformed shield tunnel linings reinforced by steel plates. Engineering Failure Analysis, 143:106850.

[8]LiZ, LiuXZ, YangXL, et al., 2024. Structural damage mechanism and treatment of a shield tunnel under asymmetric unloading. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 148:105753.

[9]LiuDJ, WangF, HuQF, et al., 2020. Structural responses and treatments of shield tunnel due to leakage: a case study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 103:103471.

[10]LiuDJ, TianC, ZuoJP, et al., 2025. Mechanical behaviour of shield tunnel linings strengthened by steel plates spanning circumferential joints. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 21(3):459-476.

[11]LiuTJ, ChenSW, LinPQ, et al., 2022. Failure mechanism and strengthening effect of shield tunnel lining reinforced by steel plates with corbels. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 26(4):1603-1621.

[12]LiuX, BaiY, YuanY, et al., 2016. Experimental investigation of the ultimate bearing capacity of continuously jointed segmental tunnel linings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 12(10):1364-1379.

[13]LiuX, DongZB, BaiY, et al., 2017. Investigation of the structural effect induced by stagger joints in segmental tunnel linings: first results from full-scale ring tests. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 66:1-18.

[14]LiuX, YangZH, MenYQ, 2021. Temporal variation laws of longitudinal stress on cross section of shield tunnels. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 43(1):188-193 (in Chinese).

[15]LuCR, ZhangXH, ShiBB, et al., 2024. Deformation in settlement and grouting remediation of thickened larger-diameter metro shield tunnel in soft soil: a case study. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 20:e02736.

[16]MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China), 2021. Standard for Design of Shield Tunnel Engineering, GB/T 51438-2021. National Standards of the People’s Republic of China(in Chinese).

[17]RanL, DingY, ChenQZ, et al., 2023. Influence of adjacent shield tunneling construction on existing tunnel settlement: field monitoring and intelligent prediction. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 24(12):1106-1119.

[18]SharghiM, AfshinH, DiasD, et al., 2023. 3D numerical study of the joint dislocation and spacing impacts on the damage of tunnel segmental linings. Structures, 56:104878.

[19]SuD, ChenWJ, WangXT, et al., 2022. Numerical study on transverse deformation characteristics of shield tunnel subject to local soil loosening. Underground Space, 7(1):106-121.

[20]WangSM, PengXY, ZhouH, et al., 2023. Deformation control criterion of shield tunnel under lateral relaxation of soft soil. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 17(5):780-795.

[21]WeiG, ZhouXX, XuTB, et al., 2024. Full-scale experimental and structural characterization study of shield tunnel reinforcement under ground stacking loads. Structures, 60:105865.

[22]WuHN, ChenS, ChenRP, et al., 2022. Deformation behaviors and failure mechanism of segmental RC lining under unloading condition. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 130:104687.

[23]WuHN, LiuL, LiuY, et al., 2023. Weakening behavior of waterproof performance in joints of shield tunnels under adjacent constructions. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 17(6):884-900.

[24]YeXW, ZhangXL, ChenYB, et al., 2024. Prediction of maximum upward displacement of shield tunnel linings during construction using particle swarm optimization-random forest algorithm. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 25(1):1-17.

[25]ZhaiWZ, ZhangDM, HuangHW, et al., 2023. Numerical investigation into the composite behaviour of over-deformed segmental tunnel linings strengthened by bonding steel plates. Soils and Foundations, 63(4):101335.

[26]ZhengG, QiuHM, ZhangTQ, et al., 2024. Experimental study of the effects of contact loss under a shield tunnel invert. Acta Geotechnica, 19(6):4189-4199.

[27]ZhouL, ZhuHH, ShenY, et al., 2022. Full-scale experimental investigation on progressive failure characteristics of shield segmental lining connected through segmental joints containing ductile-iron joint panels. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 22(3):120.