Similar articles

Abstract: Objectives: The objective of the current study was to examine the effect of a daily pain diary on recovery from acute whiplash injury. Design: Cohort-controlled study. Setting: Primary care clinic. Participants: A total 56 of 60 initially-recruited subjects were seen in follow-up three months post-injury, 27 in the Diary group and 29 in the Control group. Summary of Background Data: Symptom diaries are often recommended to or used by patients suffering with acute whiplash injury. Diaries have been shown to be associated, however, with symptom amplification in healthy subjects. The effect of diary use on recovery from injury is unknown. Interventions: Subjects with acute whiplash injury were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a Diary group and Control group. Primary outcome measures: Data was gathered within one week of injury on gender, age, and whiplash Disability Questionnaire scores. The Diary group was asked then to keep a record of their overall pain experience, rating their pain on a scale of 1–10 on a daily basis for four weeks. Results: At the outset, both groups had similar mean age, gender distribution, and mean whiplash Disability Questionnaire scores. After four weeks of pain diary use, fewer Diary group subjects reported recovery at three months compared to the Control group (59% versus 86%, respectively, p<0.05). Conclusions: The use of a pain diary for four weeks in acute whiplash-injured subjects is associated with a reduced rate of recovery.

[1]Aaron, L.A., Turner, J.A., Mancl, L., Brister, H., Sawchuk, C.N., 2005. Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables: is reactivity a problem? J. Pain, 6(2):107-115.

[2]Carroll, L.J., Holm, L.W., Hogg-Johnson, S., Côté, P., Cassidy, J.D., Haldeman, S., Nordin, M., Hurwitz, E.L., Carragee, E.J., van der Velde, G., et al., 2009. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther., 32(2):S97-S107.

[3]Eich, E., Reeves, J.L., Jaeger, B., Graff-Radford, S.B., 1985. Memory for pain: relation between past and present pain intensity. Pain, 23(4):375-379.

[4]Ferrari, R., Russell, A.S., 2010. Effect of a symptom diary on symptom frequency and intensity in healthy subjects. J. Rheumatol., 37(11):2387-2389.

[5]Ferrari, R., Louw, D., 2011. Coping style as a predictor of compliance with referral to active rehabilitation in whiplash patients. Clin. Rheumatol., 30(9):1221-1225.

[6]Ferrari, R., Russell, A.S., Kelly, A.J., 2006. Assessing whiplash recovery―the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire. Aust. Fam. Physician, 35(8):653-654.

[7]Gendreau, M., Hufford, M.R., Stone, A.A., 2003. Measuring clinical pain in chronic widespread pain: selected methodological issues. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol., 17(4):575-592.

[8]Gorin, A.A., Stone, A.A., 2001. Recall Biases and Cognitive Errors in Retrospective Self-Reports: A Call for Momentary Assessments. In: Baum, A., Revenson, T., Singer, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Health Psychology. Erlbaum, New Jersey, p.405-413.

[9]Hufford, M.R., Shiffman, S., Paty, J., 2001. Ecological Momentary Assessment: Real World, Real-Time Measurement of Patient Experience. In: Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M. (Eds.), Progress in Ambulatory Assessment. Hogrefe and Huber, Seattle, p.69-92.

[10]Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B.L., Schrieber, C.A., Redelmeier, D.A., 1993. When more pain is preferred to less: adding a better end. Psychol. Sci., 4(6):401-405.

[11]Roelofs, J., Peters, M.L., Patijn, J., Schouten, E.G., Vlaeyen, J.W., 2004. Electronic diary assessment of pain-related fear, attention to pain, and pain intensity in chronic low back pain patients. Pain, 112(3):335-342.

[12]Russell, A., Ferrari, R., 2008. Whiplash: social interventions and solutions. J. Rheumatol., 35(12):2300-2302.

[13]Sadovsky, R., Dodick, D.W., 2005. Identifying migraine in primary care settings. Am. J. Med., 118(s1):11S-17S.