
Yapeng YANG, Xiang TAN, Zeyue ZHANG, Lifeng LIANG, Zhifeng WU, Jinhui HE, Yuqing WANG, Miaomiao DONG, Jixia ZHENG, Hang ZHANG, Shuaifei FENG, Wei CHENG, Bota CUI, Hong WEI, Qinjin LI. Metagenomic sequencing reveals high reproducibility of human donor microbiota transplanted into germ-free mice via lower gut route[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2026, 27(4): 375-389.
@article{title="Metagenomic sequencing reveals high reproducibility of human donor microbiota transplanted into germ-free mice via lower gut route",
author="Yapeng YANG, Xiang TAN, Zeyue ZHANG, Lifeng LIANG, Zhifeng WU, Jinhui HE, Yuqing WANG, Miaomiao DONG, Jixia ZHENG, Hang ZHANG, Shuaifei FENG, Wei CHENG, Bota CUI, Hong WEI, Qinjin LI",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="27",
number="4",
pages="375-389",
year="2026",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B2400495"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Metagenomic sequencing reveals high reproducibility of human donor microbiota transplanted into germ-free mice via lower gut route
%A Yapeng YANG
%A Xiang TAN
%A Zeyue ZHANG
%A Lifeng LIANG
%A Zhifeng WU
%A Jinhui HE
%A Yuqing WANG
%A Miaomiao DONG
%A Jixia ZHENG
%A Hang ZHANG
%A Shuaifei FENG
%A Wei CHENG
%A Bota CUI
%A Hong WEI
%A Qinjin LI
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 27
%N 4
%P 375-389
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2026
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B2400495
TY - JOUR
T1 - Metagenomic sequencing reveals high reproducibility of human donor microbiota transplanted into germ-free mice via lower gut route
A1 - Yapeng YANG
A1 - Xiang TAN
A1 - Zeyue ZHANG
A1 - Lifeng LIANG
A1 - Zhifeng WU
A1 - Jinhui HE
A1 - Yuqing WANG
A1 - Miaomiao DONG
A1 - Jixia ZHENG
A1 - Hang ZHANG
A1 - Shuaifei FENG
A1 - Wei CHENG
A1 - Bota CUI
A1 - Hong WEI
A1 - Qinjin LI
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 27
IS - 4
SP - 375
EP - 389
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2026
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B2400495
Abstract: Human flora-associated (HFA) mice are often used to simulate the structure of human intestinal microbiota and to study the causal relationships between diseases and gut microbiota. However, several factors affect the colonization efficiency of human microbiota in germ-free (GF) mice, and the differential effects of gavage and lower gut transplantation on colonization are still unclear. In this study, we explored the reproducibility of the recipient-to-donor gut microbiota community structure and function under different transplantation routes and the differences in microbial colonization between recipients via gavage transplantation (GT_mice group) and lower gut transplantation (LGT_mice group). High-throughput sequencing of the metagenome was performed on the feces of each subject, and the composition of microbiome of each group was analyzed. As expected, the introduction of human fecal microbiota into GF mice via lower gut transplantation had a high transfer efficiency, which was evident from the similar species community structure to that of the donor (Adonis R2=0.713 960 for LGT_mice group‒donor group; Adonis R2=0.774 095 for GT_mice group‒donor group) and a higher bacterial colonization rate. The findings provide unique insights into improving the accuracy of constructing humanized microbiota transplantation models, aiding our understanding of the relationships between the human gut microbiota and disease.
[1]ArrietaMC, WalterJ, FinlayBB, 2016. Human microbiota-associated mice: a model with challenges. Cell Host Microbe, 19(5):575-578.
[2]BäckhedF, DingH, WangT, et al., 2004. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101(44):15718-15723.
[3]BeckerN, KunathJ, LohG, et al., 2011. Human intestinal microbiota: characterization of a simplified and stable gnotobiotic rat model. Gut Microbes, 2(1):25-33.
[4]BensonAK, KellySA, LeggeR, et al., 2010. Individuality in gut microbiota composition is a complex polygenic trait shaped by multiple environmental and host genetic factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107(44):18933-18938.
[5]CampbellJH, FosterCM, VishnivetskayaT, et al., 2012. Host genetic and environmental effects on mouse intestinal microbiota. ISME J, 6(11):2033-2044.
[6]CebraJJ, 1999. Influences of microbiota on intestinal immune system development. Am J Clin Nutr, 69(5):1046S-1051S.
[7]ChassaingB, KorenO, GoodrichJK, et al., 2015. Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature, 519(7541):92-96.
[8]ChungH, PampSJ, HillJA, et al., 2012. Gut immune maturation depends on colonization with a host-specific microbiota. Cell, 149(7):1578-1593.
[9]CuiBT, LiP, XuLJ, et al., 2016. Step-up fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) strategy. Gut Microbes, 7(4):323-328.
[10]DiekertG, WohlfarthG, 1994. Metabolism of homoacetogens. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 66(1-3):209-221.
[11]DonaldsonGP, LeeSM, MazmanianSK, 2016. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol, 14(1):20-32.
[12]EntnerN, DoudoroffM, 1952. Glucose and gluconic acid oxidation of Pseudomonas saccharophila. J Biol Chem, 196(2):853-862.
[13]FouladiF, GlennyEM, Bulik-SullivanEC, et al., 2020. Sequence variant analysis reveals poor correlations in microbial taxonomic abundance between humans and mice after gnotobiotic transfer. ISME J, 14(7):1809-1820.
[14]FrançoisJ, ParrouJL, 2001. Reserve carbohydrates metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 25(1):125-145.
[15]FritzJV, DesaiMS, ShahP, et al., 2013. From meta-omics to causality: experimental models for human microbiome research. Microbiome, 1:14.
[16]GeerlingsSY, KostopoulosI, de vosWM, et al., 2018. Akkermansia muciniphila in the human gastrointestinal tract: when, where, and how? Microorganisms, 6(3):75.
[17]HuangKY, YanYM, ChenD, et al., 2020. Ascorbic acid derivative 2-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-l-ascorbic acid from the fruit of Lycium barbarum modulates microbiota in the small intestine and colon and exerts an immunomodulatory effect on cyclophosphamide-treated BALB/C mice. J Agric Food Chem, 68(40):11128-11143.
[18]JansenK, StupperichE, FuchsG, 1982. Carbohydrate synthesis from acetyl CoA in the autotroph Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. Arch Microbiol, 132(4):355-364.
[19]KitaharaM, SakamotoM, IkeM, et al., 2005. Bacteroides plebeius sp. nov. and Bacteroides coprocola sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 55(5):2143-2147.
[20]KumarR, YiNJ, ZhiDG, et al., 2017. Identification of donor microbe species that colonize and persist long term in the recipient after fecal transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes, 3:12.
[21]le RoyT, LlopisM, LepageP, et al., 2013. Intestinal microbiota determines development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. Gut, 62(12):1787-1794.
[22]le RoyT, DebédatJ, MarquetF, et al., 2019. Comparative evaluation of microbiota engraftment following fecal microbiota transfer in mice models: age, kinetic and microbial status matter. Front Microbiol, 9:3289.
[23]LeyRE, TurnbaughPJ, KleinS, et al., 2006. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature, 444(7122):1022-1023.
[24]LiJ, WeiH, 2019. Establishment of an efficient germ-free animal system to support functional microbiome research. Sci China Life Sci, 62(10):1400-1403.
[25]LiN, ZuoB, HuangSM, et al., 2020. Spatial heterogeneity of bacterial colonization across different gut segments following inter-species microbiota transplantation. Microbiome, 8:161.
[26]LiP, HotamisligilGS, 2010. Metabolism: host and microbes in a pickle. Nature, 464(7293):1287-1288.
[27]LiSS, ZhuAN, BenesV, et al., 2016. Durable coexistence of donor and recipient strains after fecal microbiota transplantation. Science, 352(6285):586-589.
[28]LjungdhalLG, 1986. The autotrophic pathway of acetate synthesis in acetogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol, 40:415-450.
[29]LooftT, AllenHK, CantarelBL, et al., 2014. Bacteria, phages and pigs: the effects of in-feed antibiotics on the microbiome at different gut locations. ISME J, 8(8):1566-1576.
[30]MarteauP, PochartP, DoreJ, et al., 2001. Comparative study of bacterial groups within the human cecal and fecal microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol, 67(10):4939-4942.
[31]Martinez-GurynK, LeoneV, ChangEB, 2019. Regional diversity of the gastrointestinal microbiome. Cell Host Microbe, 26(3):314-324.
[32]Nagao-KitamotoH, ShreinerAB, GillillandMG, et al., 2016. Functional characterization of inflammatory bowel disease-associated gut dysbiosis in gnotobiotic mice. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2(4):468-481.
[33]OliverJC, GudihalR, BurgnerJW, et al., 2014. Conformational changes involving ammonia tunnel formation and allosteric control in GMP synthetase. Arch Biochem Biophys, 545:22-32.
[34]PangXY, HuaXG, YangQ, et al., 2007. Inter-species transplantation of gut microbiota from human to pigs. ISME J, 1(2):156-162.
[35]RamaiD, ZakhiaK, OfosuA, et al., 2019. Fecal microbiota transplantation: donor relation, fresh or frozen, delivery methods, cost-effectiveness. Ann Gastroenterol, 32(1):30-38.
[36]RawlsJF, MahowaldMA, LeyRE, et al., 2006. Reciprocal gut microbiota transplants from zebrafish and mice to germ-free recipients reveal host habitat selection. Cell, 127(2):423-433.
[37]RobertC, ChassardC, LawsonPA, et al., 2007. Bacteroides cellulosilyticus sp. nov., a cellulolytic bacterium from the human gut microbial community. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 57(7):1516-1520.
[38]SilleyP, 2009. Human flora-associated rodents ‒ does the data support the assumptions? Microb Biotechnol, 2(1):6-14.
[39]TanimizuN, KanekoK, ItohT, et al., 2016. Intrahepatic bile ducts are developed through formation of homogeneous continuous luminal network and its dynamic rearrangement in mice. Hepatology, 64(1):175-188.
[40]TarasD, SimmeringR, CollinsMD, et al., 2002. Reclassification of Eubacterium formicigenerans Holdeman and Moore 1974 as Dorea formicigenerans gen. nov., comb. nov., and description of Dorea longicatena sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 52(2):423-428.
[41]TurnbaughPJ, LeyRE, MahowaldMA, et al., 2006. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature, 444(7122):1027-1031.
[42]TurnbaughPJ, BäckhedF, FultonL, et al., 2008. Diet-induced obesity is linked to marked but reversible alterations in the mouse distal gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe, 3(4):213-223.
[43]TurnbaughPJ, RidauraVK, FaithJJ, et al., 2009. The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice. Sci Transl Med, 1(6):6ra14.
[44]Vijay-KumarM, AitkenJD, CarvalhoFA, et al., 2010. Metabolic syndrome and altered gut microbiota in mice lacking Toll-like receptor 5. Science, 328(5975):228-231.
[45]WangTT, CaiGX, QiuYP, et al., 2012. Structural segregation of gut microbiota between colorectal cancer patients and healthy volunteers. ISME J, 6(2):320-329.
[46]WangYF, ZhangZ, YangPK, et al., 2020. Molecular mechanism underlying the effect of illumination time on the growth performance of broilers via changes in the intestinal bacterial community. PeerJ, 8:e9638.
[47]WindmuellerHG, SpaethAE, 1981. Source and fate of circulating citrulline. Am J Physiol, 241(6):E473-E480.
[48]Wos-OxleyML, BleichA, OxleyAPA, et al., 2012. Comparative evaluation of establishing a human gut microbial community within rodent models. Gut Microbes, 3(3):234-249.
[49]YangYP, ZhengXJ, WangYQ, et al., 2022. Human fecal microbiota transplantation reduces the susceptibility to dextran sulfate sodium-induced germ-free mouse colitis. Front Immunol, 13:836542.
[50]ZhangFM, ZhangT, ZhuHM, et al., 2019. Evolution of fecal microbiota transplantation in methodology and ethical issues. Curr Opin Pharmacol, 49:11-16.
[51]ZhangT, LuGC, ZhaoZ, et al., 2020. Washed microbiota transplantation vs. manual fecal microbiota transplantation: clinical findings, animal studies and in vitro screening. Protein Cell, 11(4):251-266.
[52]ZhaoWJ, WangYP, LiuSY, et al., 2015. The dynamic distribution of porcine microbiota across different ages and gastrointestinal tract segments. PLoS One, 10(2):e0117441.
[53]ZhouW, ChowKH, FlemingE, et al., 2019. Selective colonization ability of human fecal microbes in different mouse gut environments. ISME J, 13(3):805-823.
CLC number:
On-line Access: 2026-04-24
Received: 2024-09-23
Revision Accepted: 2025-03-26
Crosschecked: 2026-04-24
Cited: 0
Clicked: 2632
Citations: Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>