CLC number: TP24
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2012-12-13
Cited: 2
Clicked: 8852
Ozoemena Anthony Ani, He Xu, Yi-ping Shen, Shao-gang Liu, Kai Xue. Modeling and multiobjective optimization of traction performance for autonomous wheeled mobile robot in rough terrain[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science C, 2013, 14(1): 11-29.
@article{title="Modeling and multiobjective optimization of traction performance for autonomous wheeled mobile robot in rough terrain",
author="Ozoemena Anthony Ani, He Xu, Yi-ping Shen, Shao-gang Liu, Kai Xue",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science C",
volume="14",
number="1",
pages="11-29",
year="2013",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.C12a0200"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Modeling and multiobjective optimization of traction performance for autonomous wheeled mobile robot in rough terrain
%A Ozoemena Anthony Ani
%A He Xu
%A Yi-ping Shen
%A Shao-gang Liu
%A Kai Xue
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C
%V 14
%N 1
%P 11-29
%@ 1869-1951
%D 2013
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.C12a0200
TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling and multiobjective optimization of traction performance for autonomous wheeled mobile robot in rough terrain
A1 - Ozoemena Anthony Ani
A1 - He Xu
A1 - Yi-ping Shen
A1 - Shao-gang Liu
A1 - Kai Xue
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science C
VL - 14
IS - 1
SP - 11
EP - 29
%@ 1869-1951
Y1 - 2013
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.C12a0200
Abstract: Application of terrain-vehicle mechanics for determination and prediction of mobility performance of autonomous wheeled mobile robot (AWMR) in rough terrain is a new research area currently receiving much attention for both terrestrial and planetary missions due to its significant role in design, evaluation, optimization, and motion control of AWMRs. In this paper, decoupled closed form terramechanics considering important wheel-terrain parameters is applied to model and predict traction. Numerical analysis of traction performance in terms of drawbar pull, tractive efficiency, and driving torque is carried out for wheels of different radii, widths, and lug heights, under different wheel slips. Effects of normal forces on wheels are analyzed. Results presented in figures are discussed and used to draw some conclusions. Furthermore, a multiobjective optimization (MOO) method for achieving optimal mobility is presented. The MOO problem is formulated based on five independent variables including wheel radius r, width b, lug height h, wheel slip s, and wheel rotation angle θ with three objectives to maximize drawbar pull and tractive efficiency while minimizing the dynamic traction ratio. Genetic algorithm in MATLAB is used to obtain optimized wheel design and traction control parameters such as drawbar pull, tractive efficiency, and dynamic traction ratio required for good mobility performance. Comparison of MOO results with experimental results shows a good agreement. A method to apply the MOO results for online traction and mobility prediction and control is discussed.
[1]Barrico, C., Antunes, C.H., Pire, D.F., 2009. Robustness analysis in evolutionary multi-objective optimization applied to VAR planning in electrical distribution networks. LNCS, 5482:216-227.
[2]Bekker, M.G., 1956. Theory of Land Locomotion. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
[3]Bekker, M.G., 1960. Off-the-Road Locomotion. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
[4]Bekker, M.G., 1969. Introduction to Terrain-Vehicle Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
[5]Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L., 2004. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, UK.
[6]Ding, L., Yoshida, K., Nagatani, K., Gao, H., Deng, Z., 2009. Parameter Identification for Planetary Soil Based on a Decoupled Analytical Wheel-Soil Interaction Terramechanics Model. Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p.4122-4127.
[7]Ding, L., Gao, H., Deng, Z., Nagatani, K., Yoshida, K., 2011a. Experimental study and analysis on driving wheel’s performance for planetary exploration rovers moving in deformable soil. J. Terramech., 48(1):27-45.
[8]Ding, L., Deng, Z., Gao, H., 2011b. Planetary rover’s wheel-soil interaction mechanics: new challenges and applications for wheeled mobile robots. Intell. Serv. Rob., 4(1):17-38.
[9]Freitas, G., Gleizer, G., Lizarralde, F., Hsu, L., Dos Reis, N.R.S., 2010. Kinematic reconfigurability control for an environmental mobile robot operating in the Amazon rain forest. J. Field Rob., 27(2):197-216.
[10]Goering, C.E., 1989. Engine and Tractor Power. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, USA.
[11]Goh, C.K., Tan, K.C., 2009. Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization in Uncertain Environments. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
[12]Gustafsson, F., 1997. Slip-based tire-road friction estimation. Automatica, 33(6):1087-1099.
[13]Iagnemma, K., Dubowsky, S., 2004. Traction control of wheeled robotic vehicles in rough terrain with application to planetary rovers. Int. J. Rob. Res., 23(10-11):1029-1040.
[14]Iagnemma, K., Ward, C.C., 2009. Classification-based wheel slip detection and detector fusion for mobile robots on outdoor terrain. Auton. Rob., 26(1):33-46.
[15]Iagnemma, K., Shibly, H., Rzepniewski, A., Dubowsky, S., 2001. Planning and Control Algorithms for Enhanced Rough-Terrain Rover Mobility. Proc. 6th Int. Symp. on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, i-SAIRAS.
[16]Iagnemma, K., Golda, D., Spenko, M., Dubowsky, S., 2002. Experimental Study of High-Speed Rough-Terrain Mobile Robot Models for Reactive Behaviours. Experimental Robotics VIII, p.654-663.
[17]Janosi, Z., Hanamoto, B., 1961. Analytical Determination of Drawbar Pull as a Function of Slip for Tracked Vehicles in Deformable Soils. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Terrain Vehicle Systems, p.707-726.
[18]Konak, A., Coit, D.W., Smith, A.E., 2006. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial. Rel. Eng. Syst. Safety, 91(9):992-1007.
[19]Konjicija, S., Avdagić, Z., 2009. Evolutionary Multi-objective Approach to Control of Mobile Robot in Unknown Environment. 22nd Int. Symp. on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies, p.1-8.
[20]Lindgren, D.R., Hague, T., Smith, P.J.P., Marchant, J.A., 2002. Relating torque and slip in an odometric model for an autonomous agricultural vehicle. Auton. Rob., 13(1):73-86.
[21]Liu, W., Winfield, A.F.T., 2010. Modeling and optimization of adaptive foraging in swarm robotic systems. Int. J. Rob. Res., 29(14):1743-1760.
[22]Marler, R.T., Arora, J.S., 2004. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 26(6):369-395.
[23]Mastinu, G., Gobbi, M., Miano, C., 2006. Optimal Design of Complex Mechanical Systems: with Application to Vehicle Engineering. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
[24]Miettinen, K., 2008. Introduction to Multiobjective Optimization: Noniterative Approaches. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
[25]Ojeda, L., Borenstein, J., 2004. Methods for the reduction of odometry errors in over-constrained mobile robots. Auton. Rob., 16(3):273-286.
[26]Reina, G., 2006. Methods for Wheel Slip and Sinkage Estimation in Mobile Robots. In: Yussof, H. (Ed.), Robot Localization and Map Building. InTech, p.561-578.
[27]Sato, M., Ishii, K., 2010. Simultaneous optimization of robot structure and control system using evolutionary algorithm. J. Bion. Eng., 7:S185-S190.
[28]Schenker, P., Huntsberger, T., Pirjanian, P., Dubowsky, S., Iagnemma, K., Sujan, V., 2003. Rovers for Intelligent, Agile Traverse of Challenging Terrain. 11th Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics.
[29]Schreiber, M., Kutzbach, H.D., 2008. Influence of soil and tire parameters on traction. Res. Agr. Eng., 54(2):43-49.
[30]Shibly, H., Iagnemma, K., Dubowsky, S., 2005. An equivalent soil mechanics formulation for rigid wheels in deformable terrain, with application to planetary exploration rovers. J. Terramech., 42(1):1-13.
[31]Sohne, W., 1958. Fundamentals of pressure distribution and soil compaction under tractor tires. Agr. Eng., 39(5):290.
[32]Stroud, K.A., 2003. Advanced Engineering Mathematics. Palgrave MacMillan, Houndmills.
[33]Vanderplaats, G.N., 1984. Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design with Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[34]Williams, W., 1995. Genetic Algorithms: a Tutorial. Available from http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/staff/musliu/.../Class9GATutorial.ppt [Accessed on Aug. 2, 2012].
[35]Wong, J.Y., 2001. Theory of Ground Vehicles. John Willey and Sons, New York, p.91-128.
[36]Wong, J.Y., 2010. Terramechanics and Off-Road Vehicle Engineering. Elsevier, p.1-10.
[37]Wong, J.Y., Reece, A.R., 1967a. Prediction of rigid wheel performance based on the analysis of soil-wheel stresses part I. Performance of driven rigid wheels. J. Terramech., 4(1):81-98.
[38]Wong, J.Y., Reece, A.R., 1967b. Prediction of rigid wheel performance based on the analysis of soil-wheel stresses part II. Performance of towed rigid wheels. J. Terramech., 4(2):7-25.
[39]Xu, H., Zhang, Z.Y., Khalil, A., Kai, X., Gao, X.Z., 2011. Prototypes selection by multi-objective optimal design: application to a reconfigurable robot in sandy terrain. Ind. Rob., 38(6):599-613.
[40]Yoshida, K., 2003. Slip, Traction Control, and Navigation of a Lunar Rover. 7th Int. Symp. on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space.
[41]Yoshida, K., Hamano, H., 2002. Motion dynamics and control of a planetary rover with slip-based traction model. Proc. SPIE, 4715:275-286.
[42]Young, R.N., Fattah, E.A., Kiadas, N., 1984. Development in Agricultural Engineering. Vehicle Traction Mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p.45-94.
[43]Zoz, F.M., Grisso, R.D., 2003. Traction and Tractor Performance. ASAE Distinguished Lecture Series, Tractor Design, p.1-45.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>