Similar articles

Abstract: Now that the latest technology can process huge amounts of data that was previously unimaginable, scientists can challenge established beliefs and prac-tices in many information-related fields. Xiao et al. (2017) made such a challenge, focusing on the effectiveness of English textbooks popularly used in Chinese primary schools. They first assumed that pupils� word recognition rate would equal the cov-erage rate of their textbook vocabulary lists. Then they used four reference corpora to calculate the latter, one of which was self-developed with an automatic web crawler. Finally, they concluded that textbook vocabulary lists were limited in timeliness, that the word recognition increment of the 6th graders was relatively small, and that word selection in textbook compilation should be adjusted. We would like to comment on their study from a Zipfian perspective as applied linguists in language acquisition.
While we agree that traditional word frequency lists should be regularly reevaluated with the help of the latest information technology, we hold the fol-lowing five points: (1) Sampling issues are important when constructing reference corpora; (2) Zipf’s law can provide evidential support for interpreting word frequencies and vocabulary list analysis; (3) Various practical constraints should be considered if vocabu-lary size in textbooks should be expanded; (4) The word twelfth should be kept in the list; (5) Joint attention should be given by scholars of various backgrounds for textbook compilation.

用齐夫定律解读教材词表--评Xiao et al. (2017)《基于语料库的小学英语认识率及教材选词策略研究》

[1]Chujo, K., 2004. Measuring vocabulary levels of English textbooks and tests using a BNC lemmatised high frequency word list. Lang. Comput., 51(1):231-249.

[2]Feng, Z., 1998. Linguistics is the bridge between mathematics and humanities. Mod. Sci., (2):21-23 (in Chinese).

[3]Kilgarriff, A., 1995. BNC Database and Word Frequency Lists. http://www.kilgarriff.co.uk/bnc-readme.html

[4]Li, Q., He, S., 2010. Comparison between vocabulary in primary school textbooks and English Curriculum Standards: a case study on New Standard and PEP. Teach. Res. Prim. Mid. Schools, (11):8-10 (in Chinese).

[5]Ministry of Education of China, 2011. English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education. Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing (in Chinese).

[6]Nation, P., Waring, R., 1997. Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In: Schmitt, N., McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p.6-19.

[7]van Heuven, W.J., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., et al., 2014. SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English. Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 67(6): 1176-1190.

[8]Xiao, W., Wang, M., Zhen, W., et al., 2017. Corpus-based research on English word recognition rates in primary school and word selection strategy. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 18(3):362-372.

[9]Zipf, G.K., 1936. The Psychobiology of Language: an Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Routledge, Abingdon, UK.