Full Text:   <3565>

CLC number: TP18

On-line Access: 

Received: 2006-03-20

Revision Accepted: 2006-08-10

Crosschecked: 0000-00-00

Cited: 7

Clicked: 6094

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

-   Go to

Article info.
1. Reference List
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2006 Vol.7 No.11 P.1781-1789


An appraisal of techniques and equipment for cutting force measurement

Author(s):  AUDY J.

Affiliation(s):  Faculty of Regional Professional Studies, Edith Cowan University, South West Campus, Bunbury, 6230, Australia

Corresponding email(s):   j.audy@ecu.edu.au

Key Words:  Cutting force measurement, Frequency analysis, Piezocrystals, Strain gauges, Error sources

Share this article to: More |Next Article >>>

AUDY J.. An appraisal of techniques and equipment for cutting force measurement[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2006, 7(11): 1781-1789.

@article{title="An appraisal of techniques and equipment for cutting force measurement",
author="AUDY J.",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T An appraisal of techniques and equipment for cutting force measurement
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 7
%N 11
%P 1781-1789
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2006
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2006.A1781

T1 - An appraisal of techniques and equipment for cutting force measurement
A1 - AUDY J.
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 7
IS - 11
SP - 1781
EP - 1789
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2006
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2006.A1781

Current research focussed on the assessment of metal machining process parameters and on the development of adaptive control, shows that machine performance, work-piece and tool material selections, tool life, quality of machined surfaces, the geometry of cutting tool edges, and cutting conditions are closely related to the cutting forces. This information is of great interest to cutting tool manufactures and users alike. Over the years there have been significant developments and improvements in the equipment used to monitor such forces. In 1930 mechanical gauges were replaced by resistance strain gauges, and some 30 years later compact air gauge dynamometers were invented. Since this time intensive research has continued being directed towards developing new approaches to cutting force measurement. The Kistler Company, well-known manufacturer of acceleration and piezoelectrical dynamometers, has worked in this field for more than three decades, and developed very sensitive devices. While leading manufacturing research laboratories are often equipped with this technology, classical electrical strain gauges and other dynamometers of individual designs are still commonly used in industry. The present paper presents data obtained using different techniques of force measurement in metal machining processes. In particular, areas of uncertainties, illustrated through results concerning the turning process, are analysed, leading to an appraisal of the current status of these measurements and their significance.

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1] Catalogue 500 Part A-B―Strain Gauges, 1994. Micro-Measurement Division Company, USA.

[2] Evans, J.C., Morgan, I.G., 1964. The Pneumatic Gauging Technique in its Application to Dimensional Measurement. Notes on Applied Science No.34, H.M.S.O, London.

[3] Field, J.S., 1967. A compact dynamometer using strain gauge principles. The International Journal of Production Research, 6(2):75-82.

[4] Gautschi, G.H., 1971. Cutting Forces in Machining and Their Routine Measurement with Multi-component Piezo-electric Force Transducers. 12th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, Manchester, p.1-8.

[5] Gibson, A., Kobler, H., 1967. Elimination of interactions in dynamometer instrumentation. The International Journal of Production Research, 6(2):83-86.

[6] Herman, F.L., 1961. Analysis of Errors in Calibration of Electronic Instruments. AIEE Comm. and Alec., p.90-95.

[7] Kail, R., Mahr, W., 1995. Piezoelectric Measuring Instruments and Their Applications. John Morris Scientific Pty Ltd., Kistler, Switzerland, p.3-27.

[8] Kazimir, I., Audy, J., 1990. Technological Phenomena and Their Evaluation by a Computer, Trend Vuma. Alpha Technical and Economical Literature, Slovakia, Vol.1.

[9] Murty, S.S.N., 1977. A study on the precision of metal cutting dynamometers. Microtecnic, 4:37-40.

[10] Ohtani, T., 1986. Cutting force characteristics in machining of hardened steel. Bull. Japan Soc. of Prec. Eng., (2):127-129.

[11] Pople, J., 1977. Errors and Uncertainties in Strain Measurement. Vickers Shipbuilding and Engineering Ltd., Barrow-in Furness, UK, p.209-262.

[12] Pople, J., 1980. BSSM Strain Measurement Reference Book, BSSM 281. England.

[13] Ravindra, H.V., Srinivasa, Y.G., Krishnamurthy, R., 1993. Modeling of tool wear based on cutting forces in turning. Wear, 169(1):25-32.

[14] Subramanian, C., Strafford, K.N., Wilks, T.P., Ward, L.P., McPhee, M.A., 1993. Performance evaluation of TiN-coated twist drills using force measurement and microscopy. Surf. Coat. Technol., 62(1-3):85.

[15] Webb, C.R., Luxmoore, A.R., 1971. Applied Mechanics. In: Experimentation for Students of Engineering, Vol. 2. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., London, p.124.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE