Similar articles

Abstract: We consider combustion regimes with hydrogen/air mixtures of stoichiometric (29.5% of hydrogen by volume) and sub-stoichiometric (less than 29.5%) compositions in the combustion chamber with parameters presented in the electronic supplementary materials. Pressure histories obtained numerically for combustion regimes of hydrogen/air mixtures of different compositions (29.5%, 26.0%, 24.0%, 22.0%, 20.0%, and 18.0%) are presented in Fig. 1a. Analysis of the data enables three characteristic combustion regimes to be distinguished: (1) detonation, observed for the stoichiometric mixture and originating spontaneously as a result of ignition of the compressed mixture, (2) a fast combustion regime, distinctively observed in the 26.0% (as well as in the 24.0% and 22.0%) mixture where the pressure history is characterized by pressure oscillations of relatively high amplitude and frequency, and (3) a slow combustion regime, realized for 18.0% hydrogen content in the mixture, where the pressure history is characterized by pressure oscillations of relatively low amplitude.

往复式发动机条件下近化学计量的氢气/空气燃烧模式

[1]BalatM, 2008. Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33(15):‍‍4013-4029. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.047

[2]FilimonovaEA, DobrovolskayaAS, BocharovAN, et al., 2020. Formation of combustion wave in lean propane-air mixture with a non-uniform chemical reactivity initiated by nanosecond streamer discharges in the HCCI engine. Combustion and Flame, 215:‍401-416. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.01.029

[3]HeHB, YaoDW, WuF, 2017. A reduced and optimized kinetic mechanism for coke oven gas as a clean alternative vehicle fuel. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 18(7):‍511-530. https:‍//doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1600636

[4]HeywoodJB, 1988. Internal Combustion Engines Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, USA, p.450-490.

[5]IvanovMF, KiverinAD, SmygalinaAE, et al., 2018. The use of hydrogen as a fuel for engines in the energy cycle of remote production facilities. Technical Physics, 63(1):‍148-151. https:‍//doi.org/10.1134/S1063784218010140

[6]KiverinA, YakovenkoI, 2021. Thermo-acoustic instability in the process of flame propagation and transition to detonation. Acta Astronautica, 181:‍649-654. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.01.042

[7]LeiZD, ChenZW, YangXQ, et al., 2020. Operational mode transition in a rotating detonation engine. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 21(9):‍721-733. https:‍//doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900349

[8]LifshitzEM, LandauLD, 1987. Fluid Mechanics:‍Volume 6. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.

[9]LiuWJ, SunL, LiZL, et al., 2020. Trends and future challenges in hydrogen production and storage research. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(25):‍31092-31104. https:‍//doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09470-0

[10]PanJY, MaGB, WeiHQ, et al., 2018. Strong knocking characteristics under compression ignition conditions with high pressures. Combustion Science and Technology, 190(10):‍1786-1803. https:‍//doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2018.1472087

[11]QiYL, WangZ, WangJX, et al., 2015. Effects of thermodynamic conditions on the end gas combustion mode associated with engine knock. Combustion and Flame, 162(11):‍4119-4128. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.08.016

[12]SzwajaS, Grab-RogalinskiK, 2009. Hydrogen combustion in a compression ignition diesel engine. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(10):‍4413-4421. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.020

[13]SzwajaS, NaberJD, 2013. Dual nature of hydrogen combustion knock. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(28):‍12489-12496. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.036

[14]SzwajaS, BhandaryKR, NaberJD, 2007. Comparisons of hydrogen and gasoline combustion knock in a spark ignition engine. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(18):‍5076-5087. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.07.063

[15]WangZ, LiuH, ReitzRD, 2017. Knocking combustion in spark-ignition engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 61:‍78-112. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.03.004

[16]WeiHQ, GaoDZ, ZhouL, et al., 2017. Different combustion modes caused by flame-shock interactions in a confined chamber with a perforated plate. Combustion and Flame, 178:‍277-285. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.01.011

[17]YangF, ZhangHQ, ChenZ, et al., 2013. Interaction of pressure wave and propagating flame during knock. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(35):‍15510-15519. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.078

[18]YuH, ChenZ, 2015. End-gas autoignition and detonation development in a closed chamber. Combustion and Flame, 162(11):‍4102-4111. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.08.018

[19]ZhaoJF, ZhouL, ZhongLJ, et al., 2019. Experimental investigation of the stochastic nature of end-gas autoignition with detonation development in confined combustion chamber. Combustion and Flame, 210:‍324-338. https:‍//doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.08.040