CLC number:
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 0
Clicked: 3892
Citations: Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714
Taifeng ZHU, Haoming LIN, Jian SUN, Chao LIU, Rui ZHANG. Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2021, 22(12): 985-1001.
@article{title="Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis",
author="Taifeng ZHU, Haoming LIN, Jian SUN, Chao LIU, Rui ZHANG",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="22",
number="12",
pages="985-1001",
year="2021",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B2100523"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis
%A Taifeng ZHU
%A Haoming LIN
%A Jian SUN
%A Chao LIU
%A Rui ZHANG
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 22
%N 12
%P 985-1001
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2021
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B2100523
TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis
A1 - Taifeng ZHU
A1 - Haoming LIN
A1 - Jian SUN
A1 - Chao LIU
A1 - Rui ZHANG
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 22
IS - 12
SP - 985
EP - 1001
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2021
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B2100523
Abstract: Background and aimslaparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is considered a safe and effective method for the removal of bile duct stones. However, the choice of primary duct closure (PDC) or t-tube drainage (TTD) technique after LCBDE is still controversial. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of PDC and TTD after LCBDE.
MethodsStudies published before May 1, 2021 in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to screen out randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies to compare PDC with TTD. Meta-analyses of fixed effect and random effect models were performed using RevMan 5.3.
ResultsA total of 1865 patients were enrolled in six RCTs and ten cohort studies. Regarding RCTs, the PDC group was significantly better than the TTD group in terms of operation time, total postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and hospitalization expenses (all P<0.05). Based on cohort studies of the subgroup, the PDC group had shorter operation time, shorter postoperative hospital stay, less intraoperative blood loss, and limited total postoperative complications. Statistically, there were no significant differences in bile leakage, retained stones, stone recurrence, bile duct stricture, postoperative pancreatitis, other complications, or postoperative exhaust time between the TTD and PDC groups.
ConclusionsBased on the available evidence, compared with TTD, PDC is safe and effective, and can be used as the first choice after transductal LCBDE in patients with choledocholithiasis.
[1]Al-ArdahM, BarnettRE, MorrisS, et al., 2021. Lessons learnt from the first 200 unselected consecutive cases of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct stones at a district general hospital. Surg Endosc, 35:6268-6277.
[2]AmbreenM, ShaikhAR, JamalA, et al., 2009. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy. Asian J Surg, 32(1):21-25.
[3]ApalakisA, 1976. An experimental evaluation of the types of material used for bile duct drainage tubes. Br J Surg, 63(6):440-445.
[4]AudouyC, ThereauxJ, KansouG, et al., 2016. Primary closure versus biliary drainage after laparoscopic choledocotomy: results of a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 26(1):e32-e36.
[5]CaddyGR, ThamTCK, 2006. Symptoms, diagnosis and endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 20(6):1085-1101.
[6]CaiHH, SunDL, SunYM, et al., 2012. Primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy. World J Surg, 36(1):164-170.
[7]ChenCC, WuSD, TianY, et al., 2010. The fading role of T-tube in laparoscopic choledochotomy: primary choledochorrhaphy and over pigtail J and endonasobiliary drainage tubes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A, 20(10):807-811.
[8]ChoiK, AmarasenaT, HughesA, et al., 2021. Management of bile duct stones at cholecystectomy: an Australian single-centre experience over 2 years. Surg Endosc, 35(3):1247-1253.
[9]DengY, TianHW, HeLJ, et al., 2020. Can T-tube drainage be replaced by primary suture technique in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 405(8):1209-1217.
[10]DongZT, WuGZ, LuoKL, et al., 2014. Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus T-tube. J Surg Res, 189(2):249-254.
[11]EggerM, SmithGD, SchneiderM, et al., 1997a. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109):629-634.
[12]EggerM, SmithGD, PhillipsAN, 1997b. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ, 315(7121):1533-1537.
[13]El-GeidieAAR, 2010. Is the use of T-tube necessary after laparoscopic choledochotomy? J Gastrointest Surg, 14(5):844-848.
[14]FangCZ, DongY, LiuS, et al., 2020. Laparoscopy for hepatolithiasis: biliary duct exploration with primary closure versus T-tube drainage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A, 30(10):1102-1105.
[15]GuanHQ, JiangGB, MaoXJ, 2019. Primary duct closure combined with transcystic drainage versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg, 89(7-8):885-888.
[16]HigginsJPT, GreenS, 2013. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. https://www.science-open.com/document? vid=539e5df3-6827-41af-87e4-11ee81754ccb
[17]HozoSP, DjulbegovicB, HozoI, 2005. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol, 5:13.
[18]HuaJ, MengHB, YaoL, et al., 2017. Five hundred consecutive laparoscopic common bile duct explorations: 5-year experience at a single institution. Surg Endosc, 31(9):3581-3589.
[19]JameelM, DarmasB, BakerAL, 2008. Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 90(1):29-35.
[20]JiangCN, ZhaoXH, ChengS, 2019. T-tube use after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. JSLS J Soc Laparoend Surg, 23(1):e2018.00077.
[21]JonesT, Al MusawiJ, NavaratneL, et al., 2019. Holmium laser lithotripsy improves the rate of successful transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 404(8):985-992.
[22]LeidaZ, PingB, ShuguangW, et al., 2008. A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc, 22(7):1595-1600.
[23]LouSM, ZhangM, WuZR, et al., 2019. Combined gastroscopic and choledochoscopic transabdominal nasobiliary drainage. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 20(11):940-944.
[24]LygidakisNJ, 1983. Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: T-tube drainage or primary closure: effects on postoperative bacteremia and T-tube bile infection. Am J Surg, 146(2):254-256.
[25]LyuYX, ChengYX, LiT, et al., 2019. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc, 33(10):3275-3286.
[26]ManesG, PaspatisG, AabakkenL, et al., 2019. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy, 51(5):472-491.
[27]MoherD, LiberatiA, TetzlaffJ, et al., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol, 62(10):1006-1012.
[28]NavaratneL, IslaAM, 2021. Transductal versus transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: an institutional review of over four hundred cases. Surg Endosc, 35(1):437-448.
[29]Parra-MembrivesP, Martínez-BaenaD, Lorente-HerceJ, et al., 2018. Comparative study of three bile duct closure methods following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A, 28(2):145-151.
[30]RienhoffWF, 1960. Primary closure of the common duct. Ann Surg, 151(2):255-260.
[31]ShakyaJPS, AgrawalN, KumarA, et al., 2017. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy: a prospective randomized study. Int Surg J, 4(5):1762-1764.
[32]SugiyamaM, SuzukiY, AbeN, et al., 2004. Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy. Gut, 53(12):1856-1859.
[33]TestoniPA, MarianiA, AabakkenL, et al., 2016. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy, 48(7):657-683.
[34]VidaganyNE, del PozoCD, TomásNP, et al., 2016. Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc, 30(5):1975-1982.
[35]WenSQ, HuQH, WanM, et al., 2017. Appropriate patient selection is essential for the success of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Dig Dis Sci, 62(5):1321-1326.
[36]WilliamsE, BeckinghamI, el SayedG, et al., 2017. Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut, 66(5):765-782.
[37]WilliamsEJ, GreenJ, BeckinghamI, et al., 2008. Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut, 57(7):1004-1021.
[38]WillsVL, GibsonK, KarihalootC, et al., 2002. Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg, 72(3):177-180.
[39]WuX, HuangZJ, ZhongJY, et al., 2019. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is safe for management of choledocholithiasis in elderly patients. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 18(6):557-561.
[40]WuXS, YangY, DongP, et al., 2012. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 397(6):909-916.
[41]XiaoLK, XiangJF, WuK, et al., 2018. The reasonable drainage option after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 42(6):564-569.
[42]YanY, ShaYH, YuanW, et al., 2021. One-stage versus two-stage management for acute cholecystitis associated with common bile duct stones: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc, online.
[43]YiHJ, HongG, MinSK, et al., 2015. Long-term outcome of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with choledochoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 25(3):250-253.
[44]ZhangHW, ChenYJ, WuCH, et al., 2014. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective analysis and comparison with conventional T-tube drainage. Am Surg, 80(2):178-181.
[45]ZhangLD, BieP, ChenP, et al., 2004. Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic choledochotomy. Chin J Surg, 42(9):520-523 (in Chinese).
[46]ZhangRC, LuoH, PanYL, et al., 2015. Rate of duodenal-biliary reflux increases in patients with recurrent common bile duct stones: evidence from barium meal examination. Gastrointest Endosc, 82(4):660-665.
[47]ZhangWJ, XuGF, HuangQ, et al., 2015. Treatment of gallbladder stone with common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era. BMC Surg, 15:7.
[48]ZhouHJ, WangS, FanFX, et al., 2020. Primary closure with knotless barbed suture versus traditional T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a single-center medium-term experience. J Int Med Res, 48(1):300060519878087.
[49]ZhuJG, HanW, GuoW, et al., 2015. Learning curve and outcome of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg, 102(13):1691-1697.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>