Similar articles

Abstract: The crucial point in calibrating soil water content using the technology of time domain reflectometry (TDR) is to establish the relationship between the apparent dielectric constant and the water content. Based on a database, which included 45 kinds of soil samples and 418 data points from our own test data and relevant literature, an empirical calibration equation is proposed. Additionally, the influence of soil type, dry density of soil, compaction energy, pore fluid conductivity, and temperature on the calculated result for water content was also analyzed. Results show that the equation can offer an error of ±0.05 g/g for most soils encountered in geotechnical engineering. However, the estimation error given by the empirical equation becomes significant for soils with dry density less than 1.3 g/cm³, so the equation was modified to consider the influence of dry density. Both of the empirical equations can be used to test gravimetric water content using the TDR method conveniently and efficiently without calibration.

The authors are to be commended for a different and interesting approach to the use of TDR in estimating gravimetric water content. The manuscript is reasonably well written.

土体含水率时域反射法现场测试经验模型研究

[1]Abu-Hassanein, Z.S., Benson, C.H., Blotz, L.R., 1996. Electrical resistivity of compacted clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122(5):397-406.

[2]ASTM, 2007. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort, D698-07. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, USA.

[3]ASTM, 2009. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort, D1557-09. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, USA.

[4]ASTM, 2010. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes, D2487-10. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, USA.

[5]ASTM, 2012a. Standard Test Method for Water Content and Density of Soil in situ by Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR), D6780-12. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, USA.

[6]ASTM, 2012b. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort, D698-12. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, USA.

[7]Baker, J.M., Allmaras, R.R., 1990. System for automating and multiplexing soil moisture measurement by time-domain reflectometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54(1):1-6.

[8]Birchak, J.R., Gardner, C.G., Hipp, J.E., et al., 1974. High dielectric constant microwave probes for sensing soil moisture. Proceedings of the IEEE, 62(1):93-98.

[9]Chen, W., 2011. The Design of TDR Probe and Monitoring Technology of Water Content and Dry Density. MS Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (in Chinese).

[10]Chen, Y., 2011. Study on Dielectric Constant and Water Content Measurement of Highly Conductive Geomaterials by TDR Technique. PhD Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (in Chinese).

[11]Chen, Y.M., 2014. A fundamental theory of environmental geotechnics and its application. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 36(1):1-46 (in Chinese).

[12]Chen, Y.M., Bian, X.C., Chen, R.P., et al., 2003. Propagation of electromagnetic wave in the three phases soil media. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 24(6):691-699.

[13]Chen, Y.M., Wang, H.L., Chen, R.P., et al., 2014. A newly designed TDR probe for soils with high electrical conductivities. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 37(1):36-45.

[14]Cui, Y.J., Duong, T.V., Tang, A.M., et al., 2013. Investigation of the hydro-mechanical behaviour of fouled ballast. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 14(4):244-255.

[15]Dirksen, C., Dasberg, S., 1993. Improved calibration of time domain reflectometry soil water content measurements. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57(3):660-667.

[16]Dobson, M.C., Ulaby, F.T., Hallikainen, M.T., et al., 1985. Microwave dielectric behavior of wet soil-Part II: dielectric mixing models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-23(1):35-46.

[17]Drnevich, V.P., Lin, C.P., Yi, Q., et al., 2001. Real-time Determination of Soil Type, Water Content, and Density Using Electromagnetics. Technical Report No. FHWA/ IN/JTRP-2000/20, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.

[18]Drnevich, V.P., Ashmawy, A.K., Yu, X., et al., 2005. Time domain reflectometry for water content and density of soils: study of soil-dependent calibration constants. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42(4):1053-1065.

[19]Feng, W., Lin, C.P., Drnevich, V.P., et al., 1998. Automation and standardization of measuring moisture content and density using time domain reflectometry. Technical Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-98/4, Purdue University, USA.

[20]Heimovaara, T.J., Bouten, W., Verstraten, J.M., 1994. Frequency domain analysis of time domain reflectometry waveforms: 2. A four-component complex dielectric mixing model for soils. Water Resources Research, 30(2):201-209.

[21]Herkelrath, W.N., Hamburg, S.P., Murphy, F., 1991. Automatic, real-time monitoring of soil moisture in a remote field area with time domain reflectometry. Water Resources Research, 27(5):857-864.

[22]Hook, W.R., Livingston, N.J., 1996. Errors in converting time domain reflectometry measurements of propagation velocity to estimates of soil water content. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60(1):35-41.

[23]Imhoff, P.T., Reinhart, D.R., Englund, M., et al., 2007. Review of state of the art methods for measuring water in landfills. Waste Management, 27(6):729-745.

[24]Jacobsen, O.H., Schjønning, P., 1993. A laboratory calibration of time domain reflectometry for soil water measurement including effects of bulk density and texture. Journal of Hydrology, 151(2-4):147-157.

[25]Jung, S., 2011. New Methodology for Soil Characterization Using Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR). PhD Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.

[26]Ledieu, J., de Ridder, P., de Clerck, P., et al., 1986. A method of measuring soil moisture by time-domain reflectometry. Journal of Hydrology, 88(3-4):319-328.

[27]Lin, C.P., 1999. Time Domain Reflectometry for Soil Properties. PhD Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.

[28]Malicki, M.A., Plagge, R., Roth, C.H., 1996. Improving the calibration of dielectric TDR soil moisture determination taking into account the solid soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 47(3):357-366.

[29]Masbruch, K., Ferré, T.P.A., 2003. A time domain transmission method for determining the dependence of the dielectric permittivity on volumetric water content. Vadose Zone Journal, 2(2):186-192.

[30]Noborio, K., 2001. Measurement of soil water content and electrical conductivity by time domain reflectometry: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 31(3):213-237.

[31]Pepin, S., Livingston, N.J., Hook, W.R., 1995. Temperature-dependent measurement errors in time domain reflectometry determinations of soil water. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59(1):38-43.

[32]Persson, M., Berndtsson, R., 1998. Texture and electrical conductivity effects on temperature dependency in time domain reflectometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62(4):887-893.

[33]Ponizovsky, A.A., Chudinova, S.M., Pachepsky, Y.A., 1999. Performance of TDR calibration models as affected by soil texture. Journal of Hydrology, 218(1-2):35-43.

[34]Rathje, E.M., Wright, S.G., Stokoe II, K.H., et al., 2006. Evaluation of non-nuclear methods for compaction control. Technical Report No. FHWA/TX-06/0-4835-1, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, USA.

[35]Robinson, D.A., Jones, S.B., Wraith, J.M., et al., 2003. A review of advances in dielectric and electrical conductivity measurement in soils using time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone Journal, 2(4):444-475.

[36]Schanz, T., Baille, W., Tuan, L.N., 2011. Effects of temperature on measurements of soil water content with time domain reflectometry. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 34(1):1-8.

[37]Siddiqui, S.I., Drnevich, V.P., 1995. A new method of measuring density and moisture content of soil using the technique of time domain reflectometry. Technical Report No. FHWA/IN/JHRP-95/09, Purdue University, USA.

[38]Topp, G.C., Davis, J.L., Annan, A.P., 1980. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resources Research, 16(3):574-582.

[39]Wraith, J.M., Or, D., 1999. Temperature effects on soil bulk dielectric permittivity measured by time domain reflectometry: experimental evidence and hypothesis development. Water Resources Research, 35(2):361-369.

[40]Xu, W., 2008. Theory and Technology for Measurement of Soil Water Content by Time Domain Reflectometry Surface Reflections. MS Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (in Chinese).

[41]Yu, C., Warrick, A.W., Conklin, M.H., et al., 1997. Two- and three-parameter calibrations of time domain reflectometry for soil moisture measurement. Water Resources Research, 33(10):2417-2421.

[42]Yu, X., Drnevich, V.P., 2004. Soil water content and dry density by time domain reflectometry. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(9):922-934.

[43]Zambrano, C.E., 2006. Soil Type Identification Using Time Domain Reflectometry. MS Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.