Similar articles

Abstract: The analysis of a stepped main shaft by 1D refined beam theories in cylindrical coordinate system is presented. High-order displacement fields are achieved by employing the carrera unified formulation (CUF), which takes direct implementation of any-order theory without the requirement of considering special formulations. The classical beam theories can be derived from the formulation as particular cases. The principle of minimum potential energy is used to obtain the governing differential equations and the related boundary conditions in a cylindrical coordinate system. These explicit terms of the stiffness matrices are exhibited and a global stiffness matrix is then obtained by matrix transformation. For the special working condition in a mining hoist and stepped shaft, the resulting global stiffness matrix and the loading vector are modified and applied with the boundary conditions in the static analysis of shaft parts. The accuracy of static analysis based on the refined beam theory is confirmed by comparing ANSYS solid theory and classical beam theories. An experiment for verifying the availability of the modified 1D refined beam model on the surface strain of segment 9 of the main shaft is conducted in a field experiment at Zhaojiazhai Coal Mine, China. Experimental results demonstrate the practicability of the present theory in predicting the strain field on the surface of the stepped main shaft of a mining hoist.

基于一维高阶理论的矿井提升机阶梯主轴静力分析

[1]Bathe KJ, 1996. Finite Element Procedure. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.

[2]Carrera E, Giunta G, 2010. Refined beam theories based on a unified formulation. International Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2(1):117-143.

[3]Carrera E, Petrolo M, 2011. On the effectiveness of higher-order terms in refined beam theories. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 78(2):021013.

[4]Carrera E, Petrolo M, 2012. Refined beam elements with only displacement variables and plate/shell capabilities. Meccanica, 47(3):537-556.

[5]Carrera E, Giunta G, Petrolo M, 2011. Beam Structures: Classical and Advanced Theories. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, p.188.

[6]Carrera E, Cinefra M, Petrolo M, et al., 2014. Finite Element Analysis of Structures through Unified Formulation. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, UK, p.385.

[7]Carrera E, Pagani A, Petrolo M, et al., 2015a. Recent developments on refined theories for beams with applications. Mechanical Engineering Reviews, 2(2):1400298.

[8]Carrera E, Pagani A, Petrolo M, 2015b. Refined 1D finite elements for the analysis of secondary, primary, and complete civil engineering structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(4):04014123.

[9]Chan KT, Lai KF, Stephen NG, et al., 2011. A new method to determine the shear coefficient of Timoshenko beam theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 330(14):3488-3497.

[10]Cowper GR, 1966. The shear coefficient in Timoshenko’s beam theory. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 33(2):335-340.

[11]Dhillon BS, 2010. Mine Safety: a Modern Approach. Springer-Verlag London Limited, London, UK, p.192.

[12]Euler L, 1744. De Curvis Elasticis. Bousquet, Geneva, Switzerland.

[13]Filippi M, Pagani A, Petrolo M, et al., 2015. Static and free vibration analysis of laminated beams by refined theory based on Chebyshev polynomials. Composite Structures, 132:1248-1259.

[14]Friedman Z, Kosmatka JB, 1993. An improved two-node Timoshenko beam finite element. Computers & Structures, 47(3):473-481.

[15]Gao XL, 2015. A new Timoshenko beam model incorporating microstructure and surface energy effects. Acta Mechanica, 226(2):457-474.

[16]Gruttmann F, Wagner W, 2001. Shear correction factors in Timoshenko’s beam theory for arbitrary shaped cross-sections. Computational Mechanics, 27(3):199-207.

[17]Hutchinson JR, 2001. Shear coefficients for Timoshenko beam theory. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 68(1):87-92.

[18]Jensen JJ, 1983. On the shear coefficient in Timoshenko’s beam theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 87(4):621-635.

[19]Pagani A, Boscolo M, Banerjee JR, et al., 2013. Exact dynamic stiffness elements based on one-dimensional higher-order theories for free vibration analysis of solid and thin-walled structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 332(23):6104-6127.

[20]Pagani A, Petrolo M, Colonna G, et al., 2015. Dynamic response of aerospace structures by means of refined beam theories. Aerospace Science and Technology, 46:360-373.

[21]Pagani A, de Miguel AG, Petrolo M, et al., 2016. Analysis of laminated beams via Unified Formulation and Legendre polynomial expansions. Composite Structures, 156:78-92.

[22]Stephen NG, Levinson M, 1979. A second order beam theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 67(3):293-305.

[23]Tetsuo I, 1990. Timoshenko beam theory with extension effect and its stiffness equation for finite rotation. Computers & Structures, 34(2):239-250.

[24]Timoshenko SP, 1921. LXVI. On the correction for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 41(245):744-746.

[25]Timoshenko SP, 1922. X. On the transverse vibrations of bars of uniform cross-section. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 43(253):125-131.

[26]Vo TP, Thai HT, 2012. Static behavior of composite beams using various refined shear deformation theories. Composite Structures, 94(8):2513-2522.