CLC number: R543.5
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 3
Clicked: 5409
Srdjan Babic, Dusko Nezic, Djordje Radak. Is the routine screening for significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis during coronary angiography/intervention indispensable?[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2013, 14(1): 83-83.
@article{title="Is the routine screening for significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis during coronary angiography/intervention indispensable?",
author="Srdjan Babic, Dusko Nezic, Djordje Radak",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="14",
number="1",
pages="83-83",
year="2013",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B1200240"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Is the routine screening for significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis during coronary angiography/intervention indispensable?
%A Srdjan Babic
%A Dusko Nezic
%A Djordje Radak
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 14
%N 1
%P 83-83
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2013
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B1200240
TY - JOUR
T1 - Is the routine screening for significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis during coronary angiography/intervention indispensable?
A1 - Srdjan Babic
A1 - Dusko Nezic
A1 - Djordje Radak
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 14
IS - 1
SP - 83
EP - 83
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2013
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B1200240
Abstract: We read the article Screening for significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis with a regression model in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography/intervention by Pu et al. (2012), published in Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), with great interest. Of particular interest to us was the part considering the logistic regression model in this specific cohort of patients for future screening for significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS). Although arteriography represents the gold standard for evaluation of ARAS, this exam is invasive and requires nephrotoxic iodinated contrast media which makes it less suitable as a first option for diagnosis or screening. Several non-invasive assessment tools, such as Doppler ultrasound and non-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, have high sensitivity and specificity rates, but also have certain shortcomings.
[1]Alpert, J.S., 1994. Myocardial infarction with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Arch. Intern. Med., 154(3):265-269.
[2]Bugiardini, R., Bairey Merz, C.N., 2005. Angina with “normal” coronary arteries: a changing philosophy. JAMA, 293(4):477-484.
[3]da Costa, A., Isaaz, K., Faure, E., Mourot, S., Cerisier, A., Lamaud, M., 2001. Clinical characteristics, aetiological factors and long-term prognosis of myocardial infarction with an absolutely normal coronary angiogram: a 3-year follow-up study of 91 patients. Eur. Heart J., 22(16):1459-1465.
[4]Pu, L.J., Shen, Y., Zhang, R.Y., Zhang, Q., Lu, L., Ding, F.H., Hu, J., Yang, Z.K., Shen, W.F., 2012. Screening for significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis with a regression model in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography/intervention. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. B (Biomed. & Biotechnol.), 13(8):631-637.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>