CLC number:
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2024-07-17
Cited: 0
Clicked: 727
Xueqing YIN, Xinzhong RUAN, Yongmeng ZHU, Yongfang YIN, Rui HUANG, Chao LIANG. Prediction of peritoneal free cancer cells in gastric cancer patients by golden-angle radial sampling dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2024, 25(7): 617-627.
@article{title="Prediction of peritoneal free cancer cells in gastric cancer patients by golden-angle radial sampling dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging",
author="Xueqing YIN, Xinzhong RUAN, Yongmeng ZHU, Yongfang YIN, Rui HUANG, Chao LIANG",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="25",
number="7",
pages="617-627",
year="2024",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B2300929"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Prediction of peritoneal free cancer cells in gastric cancer patients by golden-angle radial sampling dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
%A Xueqing YIN
%A Xinzhong RUAN
%A Yongmeng ZHU
%A Yongfang YIN
%A Rui HUANG
%A Chao LIANG
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 25
%N 7
%P 617-627
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2024
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B2300929
TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of peritoneal free cancer cells in gastric cancer patients by golden-angle radial sampling dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
A1 - Xueqing YIN
A1 - Xinzhong RUAN
A1 - Yongmeng ZHU
A1 - Yongfang YIN
A1 - Rui HUANG
A1 - Chao LIANG
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 25
IS - 7
SP - 617
EP - 627
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2024
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B2300929
Abstract: Objectiveperitoneal free cancer cells can negatively impact disease progression and patient outcomes in gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using golden-angle radial sampling dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (GRASP DCE-MRI) to predict the presence of peritoneal free cancer cells in gastric cancer patients.
MethodsAll enrolled patients were consecutively divided into analysis and validation groups. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and perfusion were performed in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgery, and peritoneal lavage specimens were collected for examination. Based on the peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) results, patients were divided into negative and positive lavage fluid groups. The data collected included clinical and MR information. A nomogram prediction model was constructed to predict the positive rate of peritoneal lavage fluid, and the validity of the model was verified based on data from the verification group.
ResultsThere was no statistical difference between the proportion of PLC-positive cases predicted by GRASP DCE-MR and the actual PLC test. MR tumor stage, tumor thickness, and perfusion parameter Tofts-Ketty model volume transfer constant (Ktrans) were independent predictors of positive peritoneal lavage fluid. The nomogram model featured a concordance index (C-index) of 0.785 and 0.742 for the modeling and validation groups, respectively.
ConclusionsGRASP DCE-MR could effectively predict peritoneal free cancer cells in gastric cancer patients. The nomogram model constructed using these predictors may help clinicians to better predict the risk of peritoneal free cancer cells being present in gastric cancer patients.
[1]BellLK, AinsworthNL, LeeSH, et al., 2011. MRI & MRS assessment of the role of the tumour microenvironment in response to therapy. NMR Biomed, 24(6):612-635.
[2]BenkertT, TianY, HuangCC, et al., 2018. Optimization and validation of accelerated golden-angle radial sparse MRI reconstruction with self-calibrating GRAPPA operator gridding. Magn Reson Med, 80(1):286-293.
[3]BorggreveAS, GoenseL, BrenkmanHJF, et al., 2019. Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI. Br J Radiol, 92(1097):20181044.
[4]BrenkmanHJF, GertsenEC, VegtE, et al., 2018. Evaluation of PET and laparoscopy in staging advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective study (PLASTIC-study). BMC Cancer, 18:450.
[5]ChandaranaH, FengL, BlockTK, et al., 2013. Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling. Invest Radiol, 48(1):10-16.
[6]de AndradeJP, MezhirJJ, 2014. The critical role of peritoneal cytology in the staging of gastric cancer: an evidence-based review. J Surg Oncol, 110(3):291-297.
[7]del ArcoCD, MuñozLE, MedinaLO, et al., 2022. Clinicopathological differences, risk factors and prognostic scores for western patients with intestinal and diffuse-type gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 14(6):1162-1174.
[8]FengL, 2022. Golden-angle radial MRI: basics, advances, and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging, 56(1):45-62.
[9]FengL, GrimmR, BlockKT, et al., 2014. Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med, 72(3):707-717.
[10]HuangZ, XieDH, GuoL, et al., 2015. The utility of MRI for pre-operative T and N staging of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol, 88(1050):20140552.
[11]ItoS, NakanishiH, KoderaY, et al., 2005. Prospective validation of quantitative CEA mRNA detection in peritoneal washes in gastric carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer, 93(9):986-992.
[12]JamelS, MarkarSR, MalietzisG, et al., 2018. Prognostic significance of peritoneal lavage cytology in staging gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer, 21(1):10-18.
[13]Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2011. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer, 14(2):101-112.
[14]Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2021. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer, 24(1):1-21.
[15]la TorreM, FerriM, GiovagnoliMR, et al., 2010. Peritoneal wash cytology in gastric carcinoma. Prognostic significance and therapeutic consequences. Eur J Surg Oncol, 36(10):982-986.
[16]LeachMO, MorganB, ToftsPS, et al., 2012. Imaging vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol, 22(7):1451-1464.
[17]LiHH, ZhuH, YueL, et al., 2018. Feasibility of free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of gastric cancer using a golden-angle radial stack-of-stars VIBE sequence: comparison with the conventional contrast-enhanced breath-hold 3D VIBE sequence. Eur Radiol, 28(5):1891-1899.
[18]MaJL, ShenH, KapesaL, et al., 2016. Lauren classification and individualized chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Oncol Lett, 11(5):2959-2964.
[19]MaL, XuXW, ZhangM, et al., 2017. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of gastric cancer: correlations of the pharmacokinetic parameters with histological type, Lauren classification, and angiogenesis. Magn Reson Imaging, 37:27-32.
[20]MezhirJJ, ShahMA, JacksLM, et al., 2010. Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patients. Ann Surg Oncol, 17(12):3173-3180.
[21]OffersenBV, BorreM, OvergaardJ, 2003. Quantification of angiogenesis as a prognostic marker in human carcinomas: a critical evaluation of histopathological methods for estimation of vascular density. Eur J Cancer, 39(7):881-890.
[22]Oh-EH, TanakaS, KitadaiY, et al., 2001. Angiogenesis at the site of deepest penetration predicts lymph node metastasis of submucosal colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum, 44(8):1129-1136.
[23]RiihimäkiM, HemminkiA, SundquistK, et al., 2016. Metastatic spread in patients with gastric cancer. Oncotarget, 7(32):52307-52316.
[24]SongSB, XueYW, 2015. Clinicopathological factor analysis of positive cells in peritoneal lavage of gastric carcinoma. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 18(11):1128-1131 (in Chinese).
[25]SunF, FengM, GuanWX, 2017. Mechanisms of peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer (review). Oncol Lett, 14(6):6991-6998.
[26]TeoQQ, ThngCH, KohTS, et al., 2014. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: applications in oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 26(10):e9-e20.
[27]ToEMC, ChanWY, ChowC, et al., 2003. Gastric cancer cell detection in peritoneal washing: cytology versus RT-PCR for CEA transcripts. Diagn Mol Pathol, 12(2):88-95.
[28]TsudaK, HoriS, MurakamiT, et al., 1995. Intramural invasion of gastric cancer: evaluation by CT with water-filling method. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 19(6):941-947.
[29]VallettiM, EshmuminovD, GneccoN, et al., 2021. Gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology: survival benefit after induction chemotherapy and conversion to negative peritoneal cytology. World J Surg Oncol, 19:245.
[30]WangYD, WuP, MaoJD, et al., 2007. Relationship between vascular invasion and microvessel density and micrometastasis. World J Gastroenterol, 13(46):6269-6273.
[31]WeidnerN, 1998. Tumoural vascularity as a prognostic factor in cancer patients: the evidence continues to grow. J Pathol, 184(2):119-122.
[32]WuCC, LiMN, MengHB, et al., 2019. Analysis of status and countermeasures of cancer incidence and mortality in China. Sci China Life Sci, 62(5):640-647.
[33]XiaoY, ZhangJ, HeX, et al., 2014. Diagnostic values of carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting peritoneal recurrence after curative resection of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Ir J Med Sci, 183(4):557-564.
[34]XuSH, FengLL, ChenYM, et al., 2019. Study on the sensitivity of multi-slice spiral CT in diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in different lymph node stations of gastric cancer. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 22(10):984-989 (in Chinese).
[35]YashiroM, ChungYS, NishimuraS, et al., 1996. Fibrosis in the peritoneum induced by Scirrhous gastric cancer cells may act as “soil” for peritoneal dissemination. Cancer, 77(8):1668-1675. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960415)77:8<1668::AID-CNCR37>3.0.CO;2-W
[36]YueJ, DuanXF, GongL, et al., 2017. Lymph node metastasis regularity and risk factors in 768 cardiac carcinoma patients. Chin J Gastrointest Surg, 20(11):1283-1287 (in Chinese).
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>