Similar articles

Abstract: This paper develops mathematically and empirically tractable regional and interregional model of economic development with increasing returns to scale (IRS) under the neoclassical assumptions. A one-sector, two-region model in which one region exhibits IRS is presented and the whole nation presents constant returns to scale. The development of the local IRS economy is shown to be constrained to a “moving equilibrium” path. The preliminary empirical results are sufficiently supportive of the argument to encourage further research along the lines of the model. In particular, the neoclassical model does not predict negative coefficients on the real rental value of capital in regressions explaining population or employment relative to that in the nation.

[1] Arrow, K.J., 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3):155-73.

[2] Bank of Canada, 2001. The Bank of Canada Review.

[3] Corrado, C.A., Hulten, C.R., Siche, D.E., 2006. Intangible Capital and Economic Growth. NBER Papers, No. 11948.

[4] Dinopoulos, E., Sener, F., 1999. New direction in Shumpeterian growth theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(2):157-185.

[5] Dixon, R., Thirlwall, A.P., 1975. A model of regional growth-rate differences on Kaldorian lines. Oxford Economic Paper, 27:201-204.

[6] Esteban, R.H., Wright, M., 2005. Urban Structure and Growth. NBER Papers, No. 11262.

[7] Faini, R., 1984. Increasing returns, non-traded inputs and regional development. The Economic Journal, 94:308-323.

[8] Gillen, W.J., Guccione, A., 1983. The relevance of wage differentials in neoclassical urban growth. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 13(4):547-555.

[9] Guccione, A., Gillen, W.J., 1980. Export-base and neoclassical type model of urban growth: a hypotheses. Canadian Journal of Economics, 13(4):700-711.

[10] Guccione, A., Delong, K., Gillen, W.J., 1995. Returns to Scale and Economic Geography: A Comment. Working Paper. University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.

[11] Hotelling, H., 1929. Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39:41-57.

[12] Jones, C., 2002. Sources of U.S. economic growth in a world of ideas. The American Economic Review, 92(1):220-239.

[13] Jones, C., 2003. Growth, Capital Shares, and a New Perspective on Production Functions. UC Berkeley, Mimeo.

[14] Jones, C., 2004. Growth and Ideas. NBER Papers, No. 10767.

[15] Krugman, P., 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3):483-499.

[16] Li, C.W., 2000. Endogenous vs semi-endogenous growth in a two-R&D-sector model. The Economic Journal, 110:109-122.

[17] Li, C.W., 2003. Endogenous growth without scale effects: comments. The American Economic Review, 93(3):1009-1017.

[18] Romer, P.M., 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5):1002-1037.

[19] Romer, P.M., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5):S71-S102.

[20] Statistics Canada, 1991-1992. The Historical Statistics of Canada.

[21] Young, A.A., 1928. Increasing returns and economic progress. The Economic Journal, 38:527-542.

[22] Young, A., 1998. Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy, 106(1):41-63.