Similar articles

Abstract: fused deposition modelling (FDM) is one of rapid prototyping (RP) technologies which uses an additive fabrication approach. Each commercially available FDM model has different types of process parameters for different applications. Some of the desired parts require excellent surface finish as well as good tolerance. The most common parameters requiring setup are the raster angle, tool path, slice thickness, build orientation, and deposition speed. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the process parameters of FDM Prodigy Plus (Stratasys, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, USA). Various selected parameters were tested and the optimum condition was proposed. The quality of the parts produced was accessed in terms of dimensional accuracy and surface finish. The optimum parameters obtained were then applied in the fabrication of the master pattern prior to silicone rubber moulding (SRM). These parameters would reduce the post processing time. The dimensional accuracy and surface roughness were analyzed using coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and surface roughness tester, respectively. Based on this study, the recommended parameters will improve the quality of the FDM parts produced in terms of dimensional accuracy and surface roughness for the application of SRM.

[1]Ahn, D., Kweon, J.H., Kwon, S., Song, J., Lee, S., 2009. Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(15-16):5593-5600.

[2]Anitha, R., Arunachalam, S., Radhakrishnan, P., 2001. Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 118(1-3):385-388.

[3]Bellini, A., Güçeri, S., Bertoldi, M., 2004. Liquefier dynamics in fused deposition. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 126(2):237-246.

[4]Chua, C.K, Leong, K.F., Lim, C.S., 2003. Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Applications (2nd Ed.). World Scientific, Singapore, p.127-128.

[5]Grimm, T., 2003. Fused Deposition Modeling: A Technology Evaluation. Available from http://www. time-compression.com/articles/html/fused_deposition.html [Accessed on Apr. 4, 2010]

[6]Han, W., Jafari, M.A., Danforth, S.C., Safari, A., 2002. Tool path-based deposition planning in fused deposition process. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 124(2):237-246.

[7]Hanumaiah, N., Ravi, B., 2007. Rapid tooling form accuracy estimation using region elimination adaptive search based sampling technique. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 13(3):182-190.

[8]Lee, B.H., Abdullah, J., Khan, Z.A., 2005. Optimization or rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 169(1):54-61.

[9]Lee, C.S., Kim, S.G., Kim, H.J., Ahn, S.J., 2007. Measurement of anisotrophic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 187-188(12):627-630.

[10]Liou, F.W., 2008. Rapid Prototyping and Engineering Applications, a Toolbox for Prototype Development. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, London.

[11]Magrab, E.D., 1997. Integrated Product and Process Design and Development, the Product Realization Process. CRC Press, London, p.192.

[12]Mahesh, S., Wong, Y.S., Fuh, J.Y.H., Loh, H.T., 2004. Benchmarking for comparative evaluation of RP systems and processes. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 10(2):123-135.

[13]Nooraini, R., 2006. Rapid Prototyping Principles and Applications. Wiley, New Jersey, p.86.

[14]Rahmati, S., Akbari, J., Barati, E., 2007. Dimensional accuracy analysis of wax patterns created by RTV silicon rubber molding using Taguchi approach. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 13(2):115-122.

[15]Sun, Q., Rizvi, G.M., Bellehumeur, C.T., Gu, P., 2008. Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 14(2):72-80.

[16]Zhang, Y., Chou, K., 2008. A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modelling using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 222(8):959-967.