Similar articles

Abstract: As a new technique in ground improvement, geosynthetic-encased columns (GECs) have promising applications in soft soil foundation. By assuming yielding occurs in the columns while the surrounding soil and the geosynthetic remain elastic, an elastoplastic analytical procedure for foundations improved by GECs is proposed. The radial stresses that the geosynthetic provides and the elastoplastic deformations of the foundation resting on a rigid base are derived. A comparison with finite element analysis shows that the proposed method is effective and can provide a reasonable prediction of a GEC’s deformation. Subsequent parametric analysis indicates that higher geosynthetic stiffness leads to better performance of the composite foundation. The optimum length of encasement is related to the load acting on the foundation and the permissible vertical and radial displacements of the column. Moreover, as the dilation angle of the column increases, the settlement decreases, especially under high loading. The influence of the encasement is more significant in soils with smaller elastic modulus.

[1]Ayadat, T., Hanna, A.M., 2005. Encapsulated stone columns as a soil improvement technique for collapsible soil. Ground Improvement, 9(4):137-147.

[2]Balaam, N.P., Booker, J.R., 1985. Effect of stone column yield on settlement of rigid foundations in stabilized clay. International Journal for Numerical Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 9(4):331-351.

[3]Gniel, J., Bouazza, A., 2009. Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(3):167-175.

[4]Gniel, J., Bouazza, A., 2010. Construction of geogrid encased stone columns: a new proposal based on laboratory testing. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28(1):108-118.

[5]Kempfert, H.G., Jaup, A., Raithel, M., 1997. Interactive Behaviour of a Flexible Reinforced Sand Column Foundation in Soft Soils. Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Hamburg, Germany, p.1757-1760.

[6]Kempfert, H.G., Raithel, M., Jaup, A., 1999. Model Tests for Analysis of the Bearing and Deformation Behaviour of Column Foundations. 12th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Infrastructure, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, p.1521-1526.

[7]Khabbazian, M., Kaliakin, V.N., Meehan, C.L., 2009. 3D Numerical Analyses of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns. International Foundation Congress and Equipment Expo., Orlando, Florida, USA, p.201-208.

[8]Khabbazian, M., Meehan, C.L., Kaliakin, V.N., 2010a. Numerical Study of Effect of Encasement on Stone Column Performance. Advances in Analysis, Modeling & Design Proceedings of the GeoFlorida Conference, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA, p.184-193.

[9]Khabbazian, M., Kaliakin, V.N., Meehan, C.L., 2010b. Numerical study of the effect of geosynthetic encasement on the behavior of granular columns. Geosynthetics International, 17(3):132-143.

[10]Lo, S.R., Zhang, R., Mak, J., 2010. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft clay: a numerical study. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28(3):292-302.

[11]Lur′E, A.I., 1964. Three-Dimensional Problems of the Theory of Elasticity. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York- London-Sydney.

[12]Malarvizhi, S.N., Ilamparuthi, K., 2008. Numerical Analysis of Encapsulated Stone Columns. 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Goa, India, p.3719-3726.

[13]Murugesan, S., Rajagopal, K., 2006. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: numerical evaluation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24(6):349-358.

[14]Murugesan, S., Rajagopal, K., 2007. Model tests on geosynthetic-encased stone columns. Geosynthetics International, 14(6):346-354.

[15]Murugesan, S., Rajagopal, K., 2010. Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136(1):129-139.

[16]Pribe, H., 1976. Abschatzunz des setzungsverhaltens lines durch stopverdich tung verbesserten baugrundes. Die Bautechnik, (5):160-162 (in German).

[17]Pulko, B., Majes, B., Logar, J., 2011. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: analytical calculation model. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29(1):29-39.

[18]Raithel, M., Kempfert, H.G., 2000. Calculation Models for Dam Foundations with Geosynthetic Coated Sand Columns. International Conference on Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, Melbourne, Australia.

[19]Rajagopal, K., Krishnaswamy, N.R., Latha, G.M., 1999. Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 17(3):171-184.

[20]van Impe, W., Silence, P., 1986. Improving of the Bearing Capacity of Weak Hydraulic Fills by Means of Geotextile. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Geotextiles, Vienna, Austria, p.1411-1416.

[21]Wu, C., Hong, Y., 2009. Laboratory tests on geosynthetic- encapsulated sand columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(2):107-120.

[22]Wu, C., Hong, Y., Lin, H., 2009. Axial stress-strain relation of encapsulated granular column. Computers and Geotechnics, 36(1-2):226-240.

[23]Zhang, Y.P., Li, T., Wang, Y., 2011. Theoretical solutions for foundations improved by geosynthetic-encased stone columns. Geosynthetics International, 18(1):12-20.