Similar articles

Abstract: Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery is increasingly being carried out on patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, but the best grafting candidate for non-left anterior descending coronary arteries is unclear. This research sought to systematically compare the efficacies and safeties of coronary bypass with radial artery and other available grafts. A systematic literature retrieval was performed for all clinical trials comparing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery with radial artery and other grafts in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Seven eligible clinical studies, comparing radial artery and great saphenous vein grafts, were found between 1966 and 2010: one prospective non-randomized and six prospective randomized trials. The pooling analysis obtained a relative risk of 0.507 (P<0.05) of graft occlusion in radial arteries compared with great saphenous veins. There was a significantly lower infection rate in arms (i.e., harvest sites for radial arteries) relative to legs (harvest sites for veins), with a pooled relative risk of 0.140 (P<0.05). From the reports on mortality after follow-up ranging from one year to six years, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two graft types (P=0.927). In addition, four cohort controlled trials for radial and right internal thoracic artery grafts were included. The radial graft was associated with less cardiac related events relative to the right internal thoracic artery graft (P=0.014), but with comparable mortality and comparable rates of repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Subjects with radial arteries seemed to have a lower occlusion rate and a lower graft harvest site infection rate than those with great saphenous veins. Moreover there were fewer cardiac related events with radial arteries relative to the right internal thoracic artery grafts. More studies are needed to confirm these findings concerning the favorable outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting with radial arteries on long-term patency and mortality.

[1]Buxton, B.F., Raman, J.S., Ruengsakulrach, P., Gordon, I., Rosalion, A., Bellomo, R., Horrigan, M., Hare, D.L., 2003. Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trial. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 125(6):1363-1371.

[2]Caputo, M., Reeves, B., Marchetto, G., Mahesh, B., Lim, K., Angelini, G.D., 2003. Radial versus right internal thoracic artery as a second arterial conduit for coronary surgery: early and midterm outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 126(1):39-47.

[3]Clarke, M., Oxman, A.D. (Eds.), 2001. Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.1.3 [updated June 2001]. Update Software, Issue 3, the Cochrane Library. Oxford.

[4]Collins, P., Webb, C.M., Chong, C.F., Moat, N.E., 2008. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation, 117(22):2859-2864.

[5]Gaudino, M., Cellini, C., Pragliola, C., Trani, C., Burzotta, F., Schiavoni, G., Nasso, G., Possati, G., 2005. Arterial versus venous bypass grafts in patients with in-stent restenosis. Circulation, 112(9S):I265-I269.

[6]Georghiou, G.P., Vidne, B.A., Dunning, J., 2005. Does the radial artery provide better long-term patency than the saphenous vein? Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg., 4(4):304-310.

[7]Hata, M., Raman, J., Matalanis, G., Rosalion, A., Storer, M., Hare, D., Buxton, B.F., 2002. Post harvest wound infection and patient's perception: comparative study between radial artery and saphenous vein harvest sites. Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 8(2):97-101.

[8]Hayward, P.A., Hare, D.L., Gordon, I., Matalanis, G., Buxton, B.F., 2007. Which arterial conduit? Radial artery versus free right internal thoracic artery: six-year clinical results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 84(2):493-497.

[9]Hayward, P.A., Hare, D.L., Gordon, I., Buxton, B.F., 2008. Effect of radial artery or saphenous vein conduit for the second graft on 6-year clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Results of a randomised trial. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 34(1):113-117.

[10]Hayward, P.A., Gordon, I.R., Hare, D.L., Matalanis, G., Horrigan, M.L., Rosalion, A., Buxton, B.F., 2010. Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 139(1):60-67.

[11]Jadad, A.R., Moore, R.A., Carroll, D., 1996. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin. Trials, 17(1):1-12.

[12]Lemma, M., Gelpi, G., Mangini, A., Vanelli, P., Carro, C., Condemi, A., Antona, C., 2001. Myocardial revascularization with multiple arterial grafts: comparison between the radial artery and the right internal thoracic artery. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 71(6):1969-1973.

[13]Lytle, B.W., Blackstone, E., Loop, F.D., Houghtaling, P.L., Arnold, J.H., Akhrass, R., McCarthy, P.M., Cosgrove, D.M., 1999. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 117(5):855-872.

[14]Miana, L.A., Lima, D.S., Whitaker, J.F., Passos, P.H., Loures, J.B., Miana, A.A., 2007. Immediate results of right internal thoracic artery and radial artery as the second arterial graft in myocardial revascularization. Rev. Bras. Cir. Cardivasc., 22(1):60-67 (in Portuguese).

[15]Muneretto, C., Bisleri, G., Negri, A., Manfredi, J., Carone, E., Morgan, J.A., Metra, M., Dei Cas, L., 2004. Left internal thoracic artery-radial artery composite grafts as the technique of choice for myocardial revascularization in elderly patients: a prospective randomized evaluation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., 127(1):179-184.

[16]Santos, G.G., Stolf, N.A., Moreira, L.F., Haddad, V.L., Simões, R.M., Carvalho, S.R., Salgado, A.A., Avelar, S.F., 2002. Randomized comparative study of radial artery and right gastroepiploic artery in composite arterial graft for CABG. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 21(6):1009-1014.

[17]Singh, S.K., Desai, N.D., Petroff, S.D., Deb, S., Cohen, E.A., Radhakrishnan, S., Schwartz, L., Dubbin, J., Fremes, S.E., 2008. The impact of diabetic status on coronary artery bypass graft patency: insights from the radial artery patency study. Circulation, 118(14S):S222-S225.

[18]Taggart, D.P., D′Amico, R., Altman, D.G., 2001. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet, 358(9285):870-875.

[19]Tatoulis, J., Buxton, B.F., Fuller, J.A., Meswani, M., Theodore, S., Powar, N., Wynne, R., 2009. Long-term patency of 1108 radial arterial-coronary angiograms over 10 years. Ann. Thorac. Surg., 88(1):23-30.

[20]Zacharias, A., Habib, R.H., Schwann, T.A., Riordan, C.J., Durham, S.J., Shah, A., 2004. Improved survival with radial artery versus vein conduits in coronary bypass surgery with left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery grafting. Circulation, 109(12):1489-1496.