Similar articles

Abstract: It has been revealed that hypoxia is dynamic in hypertrophic scars; therefore, we considered that it may have different effects on hypoxia-inducible factor-1α; (HIF-1α;) and p53 expression. Herein, we aimed to confirm the presence of a teeterboard-like conversion between HIF-1α and p53, which is correlated with scar formation and regression. Thus, we obtained samples of normal skin and hypertrophic scars to identify the differences in HIF-1α and autophagy using immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. In addition, we used moderate hypoxia in vitro to simulate the proliferative scar, and silenced HIF-1α or p53 gene expression or triggered overexpression to investigate the changes of HIF-1α and p53 expression, autophagy, apoptosis, and cell proliferation under this condition. HIF-1α, p53, and autophagy-related proteins were assayed using western blotting and immunofluorescence, whereas apoptosis was detected using flow cytometry analysis, and cell proliferation was detected using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) staining. Furthermore, immunoprecipitation was performed to verify the binding of HIF-1α and p53 to transcription cofactor p300. Our results demonstrated that, in scar tissue, HIF-1α expression increased in parallel with autophagosome formation. Under hypoxia, HIF-1α expression and autophagy were upregulated, whereas p53 expression and apoptosis were downregulated in vitro. HIF-1α knockdown downregulated autophagy, proliferation, and p300-bound HIF-1α, and upregulated p53 expression, apoptosis, and p300-bound p53. Meanwhile, p53 knockdown induced the opposite effects and enhanced HIF-1α, whereas p53 overexpression resulted in the same effects and reduced HIF-1α. Our results suggest a teeterboard-like conversion between HIF-1α and p53, which is linked with scar hyperplasia and regression.

成纤维细胞自噬和凋亡的转变取决于HIF-1α或p53的显性表达

[1]AnWG, KanekalM, SimonMC, et al., 1998. Stabilization of wild-type p53 by hypoxia-inducible factor 1α. Nature, 392(6674):405-408.

[2]BjørkøyG, LamarkT, BrechA, et al., 2005. p62/SQSTM1 forms protein aggregates degraded by autophagy and has a protective effect on huntingtin-induced cell death. J Cell Biol, 171(4):603-614.

[3]ChenYB, NiuZH, JiangWQ, et al., 2021. 3D-printed models improve surgical planning for correction of severe postburn ankle contracture with an external fixator. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 22(10):866-875.

[4]DengMZ, ZhangWZ, YuanLL, et al., 2020. HIF-1a regulates hypoxia-induced autophagy via translocation of ANKRD37 in colon cancer. Experim Cell Res, 395(1):112175.

[5]DongJY, SongF, LiuYK, et al., 2016. Effects of severe hypoxia and low concentration of serum protein on the function of human hypertrophic scar fibroblasts. Chin J Burns, 32(10):594-598 (in Chinese).

[6]FinnertyCC, JeschkeMG, BranskiLK, et al., 2016. Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury. Lancet, 388(10052):1427-1436.

[7]GauglitzGG, KortingHC, PavicicT, et al., 2011. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med, 17(1-2):113-125.

[8]GiordanoA, AvantaggiatiML, 1999. p300 and CBP: partners for life and death. J Cell Physiol, 181(2):218-230.

[9]GriggioV, VitaleC, TodaroM, et al., 2020. HIF-1α is over-expressed in leukemic cells from TP53-disrupted patients and is a promising therapeutic target in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica, 105(4):1042-1054.

[10]HarrisAL, 2002. Hypoxia—a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nat Rev Cancer, 2(1):38-47.

[11]HeCC, KlionskyDJ, 2009. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Annu Rev Genet, 43:67-93.

[12]IvanM, KondoK, YangHF, et al., 2001. HIFα targeted for VHL-mediated destruction by proline hydroxylation: implications for O₂ sensing. Science, 292(5516):464-468.

[13]JaakkolaP, MoleDR, TianYM, et al., 2001. Targeting of HIF-‍αto the von Hippel-Lindau ubiquitylation complex by O₂-regulated prolyl hydroxylation. Science, 292(5516):468-472.

[14]KabeyaY, MizushimaN, UenoT, et al., 2000. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J, 19(21):5720-5728.

[15]LeeSH, KangJH, HaJS, et al., 2020. Transglutaminase 2-mediated p53 depletion promotes angiogenesis by increasing HIF-1α‍-p300 binding in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci, 21(14):5042.

[16]LevineB, KroemerG, 2019. Biological functions of autophagy genes: a disease perspective. Cell, 176(1-2):11-42.

[17]LiangYM, ZhouRP, FuXJ, et al., 2021. HOXA5 counteracts the function of pathological scar-derived fibroblasts by partially activating p53 signaling. Cell Death Dis, 12:40.

[18]LynamEC, XieY, DawsonR, et al., 2015. Severe hypoxia and malnutrition collectively contribute to scar fibroblast inhibition and cell apoptosis. Wound Repair Regen, 23(5):664-671.

[19]MorishitaH, KaizukaT, HamaY, et al., 2017. A new probe to measure autophagic flux in vitro and in vivo. Autophagy, 13(4):757-758.

[20]Nuñez-HernandezDM, Felix-PortilloM, Peregrino-UriarteAB, et al., 2018. Cell cycle regulation and apoptosis mediated by p53 in response to hypoxia in hepatopancreas of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Chemosphere, 190:253-259.

[21]PankivS, ClausenTH, LamarkT, et al., 2007. p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J Biol Chem, 282(33):24131-24145.

[22]QingC, WangZY, SongF, et al., 2016. Dynamic biological changes in fibroblasts during hypertrophic scar formation and regression. Int Wound J, 13(2):257-262.

[23]RatcliffePJ, O'RourkeJF, MaxwellPH, et al., 1998. Oxygen sensing, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 and the regulation of mammalian gene expression. J Exp Biol, 201(8):‍1153-1162.

[24]RaviR, MookerjeeB, BhujwallaZM, et al., 2000. Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by p53-induced degradation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α. Genes Dev, 14(1):34-44.

[25]SchmidT, ZhouJ, KöhlR, et al., 2004. p300 relieves p53-evoked transcriptional repression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1). Biochem J, 380(1):289-295.

[26]SchneiderCA, RasbandWS, EliceiriKW, 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods, 9(7):671-675.

[27]ShiehSY, IkedaM, TayaY, et al., 1997. DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53 alleviates inhibition by MDM2. Cell, 91(3):325-334.

[28]SunYX, YaoX, ZhangQJ, et al., 2018. Beclin-1-dependent autophagy protects the heart during sepsis. Circulation, 138(20):2247-2262.

[29]van den BroekLJ, LimandjajaGC, NiessenFB, et al., 2014. Human hypertrophic and keloid scar models: principles, limitations and future challenges from a tissue engineering perspective. Experi Dermatol, 23(6):382-386.

[30]WangHK, ZhangDS, JiaSS, et al., 2018. Effect of sustained hypoxia on autophagy of genioglossus muscle-derived stem cells. Med Sci Monit, 24:2218-2224.

[31]WuX, LiJ, YangXK, et al., 2018. miR-155 inhibits the formation of hypertrophic scar fibroblasts by targeting HIF-1α via PI3K/AKT pathway. J Mol Histol, 49(4):377-387.

[32]XiaSX, LvJX, GaoQQ, et al., 2015. Prenatal exposure to hypoxia induced Beclin 1 signaling-mediated renal autophagy and altered renal development in rat fetuses. Reprod Sci, 22(2):156-164.

[33]ZhangYP, XiongY, 2001. A p53 amino-terminal nuclear export signal inhibited by DNA damage-induced phosphorylation. Science, 292(5523):1910-1915.

[34]ZhengJX, SongF, LuSL, et al., 2014. Dynamic hypoxia in scar tissue during human hypertrophic scar progression. Dermatol Surg, 40(5):511-518.