
Binhua TANG, Yingying FENG, Xinyu GAO, Mengyao MAO, Yujia ZHANG. Integrative graph deep learning with directional decoding for robust gene regulatory network inference from single-cell transcriptomics[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2026, 27(10): 1129-1139.
@article{title="Integrative graph deep learning with directional decoding for robust gene regulatory network inference from single-cell transcriptomics",
author="Binhua TANG, Yingying FENG, Xinyu GAO, Mengyao MAO, Yujia ZHANG",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="27",
number="10",
pages="1129-1139",
year="2026",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B2500424"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Integrative graph deep learning with directional decoding for robust gene regulatory network inference from single-cell transcriptomics
%A Binhua TANG
%A Yingying FENG
%A Xinyu GAO
%A Mengyao MAO
%A Yujia ZHANG
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 27
%N 10
%P 1129-1139
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2026
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B2500424
TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrative graph deep learning with directional decoding for robust gene regulatory network inference from single-cell transcriptomics
A1 - Binhua TANG
A1 - Yingying FENG
A1 - Xinyu GAO
A1 - Mengyao MAO
A1 - Yujia ZHANG
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 27
IS - 10
SP - 1129
EP - 1139
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2026
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B2500424
Abstract: While gene regulatory networks (GRNs) are fundamental to understanding complex cellular mechanisms, the accurate inference from single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data is hindered by the inherent noise, transcriptional dropout events, and dynamic nature of gene regulation. Current computational approaches often overlook long-range regulatory interactions, lack explicit modeling of regulatory directionality, and suffer from limited generalizability. To address these limitations, we introduce scGRAIL, a supervised deep learning framework that combines inductive local-aware graph aggregation (LGA) with an asymmetric relation decoder to enable robust GRN inference. Within this framework, LGA performs multi-hop neighborhood aggregation on a transcription factor (TF)–target graph, jointly leveraging topological structure and gene expression to capture long-range regulatory dependencies. A node reconstruction autoencoder (NAE) imposes gene expression reconstruction constraints on the latent embeddings, thereby enhancing robustness to noise and data heterogeneity and improving generalization. An asymmetric difference mechanism is introduced during decoding for distinct modeling of TFs and target genes; by computing an ordered difference vector between their embeddings, the model explicitly captures the directionality and target specificity of TF–target regulatory interactions, facilitating more accurate identification of potential causal regulatory relationships. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate the model’s superiority: it achieves optimal performance on 86.4% of benchmark datasets (38/44), surpassing state-of-the-art methods. Notably, scGRAIL achieves a 4.25% increase in average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) across four real-world networks compared to the graph contrastive link prediction (GCLink) model, yielding a 17.64% AUROC improvement for the TF500+ Non-Specific network in the mouse hematopoietic stem cells with lymphoid-lineage (mHSC-L) dataset, demonstrating its resilience to noise and scalability for large-scale GRNs. These results establish scGRAIL as a transformative tool for uncovering gene regulatory logic in single-cell transcriptomics. Overall, scGRAIL enhances structural modeling and directional discrimination in single-cell GRN inference by using multi-hop graph aggregation to capture long-range regulatory dependencies, expression reconstruction constraints to improve cross-dataset robustness, and an asymmetric decoding mechanism to explicitly model the regulatory directionality between TFs and target genes.
[1]Chen GY, Liu ZP, 2022. Graph attention network for link prediction of gene regulations from single-cell RNA-sequencing data. Bioinformatics, 38(19):4522-4529.
[2]Cuevas-Diaz Duran R, Wei HC, Wu JQ, 2024. Data normalization for addressing the challenges in the analysis of single-cell transcriptomic datasets. BMC Genomics, 25:444.
[3]Gan YL, Yu JC, Xu GW, et al., 2024. Inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell transcriptomics based on graph embedding. Bioinformatics, 40(5):btae291.
[4]Hamilton WL, Ying R, Leskovec J, 2017. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA, p.1025-1035.
[5]Huynh-Thu VA, Irrthum A, Wehenkel L, et al., 2010. Inferring regulatory networks from expression data using tree-based methods. PLoS One, 5(9):e12776.
[6]KC K, Li R, Cui F, et al., 2019. GNE: a deep learning framework for gene network inference by aggregating biological information. BMC Syst Biol, 13(Suppl 2):38.
[7]Liu W, Teng ZJ, Li ZJ, et al., 2024. CVGAE: a self-supervised generative method for gene regulatory network inference using single-cell RNA sequencing data. Interdiscip Sci, 16(4):990-1004.
[8]Mao G, Pang ZB, Zuo K, et al., 2023. Predicting gene regulatory links from single-cell RNA-seq data using graph neural networks. Brief Bioinform, 24(6):bbad414.
[9]Matsumoto H, Kiryu H, Furusawa C, et al., 2017. SCODE: an efficient regulatory network inference algorithm from single-cell RNA-seq during differentiation. Bioinformatics, 33(15):2314-2321.
[10]Moerman T, Aibar Santos S, Bravo González-Blas C, et al., 2019. GRNBoost2 and Arboreto: efficient and scalable inference of gene regulatory networks. Bioinformatics, 35(12):2159-2161.
[11]Papili Gao N, Ud-Dean SMM, Gandrillon O, et al., 2018. SINCERITIES: inferring gene regulatory networks from time-stamped single cell transcriptional expression profiles. Bioinformatics, 34(2):258-266.
[12]Shu HT, Zhou JT, Lian QY, et al., 2021. Modeling gene regulatory networks using neural network architectures. Nat Comput Sci, 1(7):491-501.
[13]Wang JC, Chen YJ, Zou Q, 2023. Inferring gene regulatory network from single-cell transcriptomes with graph autoencoder model. PLoS Genet, 19(9):e1010942.
[14]Wei PJ, Jin HW, Gao Z, et al., 2025. GAEDGRN: reconstruction of gene regulatory networks based on gravity-inspired graph autoencoders. Brief Bioinform, 26(3):bbaf232.
[15]Xu J, Zhang AD, Liu F, et al., 2023. STGRNS: an interpretable transformer-based method for inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell transcriptomic data. Bioinformatics, 39(4):btad165.
[16]Yu WM, Lin ZR, Lan MF, et al., 2025. GCLink: a graph contrastive link prediction framework for gene regulatory network inference. Bioinformatics, 41(3):btaf074.
[17]Yuan L, Zhao L, Jiang YF, et al., 2024. scMGATGRN: a multiview graph attention network–based method for inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell transcriptomic data. Brief Bioinform, 25(6):bbae526.
[18]Yuan Y, Bar-Joseph Z, 2019. Deep learning for inferring gene relationships from single-cell expression data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 116(52):27151-27158.
[19]Zhao MY, He WY, Tang JJ, et al., 2022. A hybrid deep learning framework for gene regulatory network inference from single-cell transcriptomic data. Brief Bioinform, 23(2):bbab568.
[20]Zheng RQ, Li M, Chen X, et al., 2019. BiXGBoost: a scalable, flexible boosting-based method for reconstructing gene regulatory networks. Bioinformatics, 35(11):1893-1900.
CLC number:
On-line Access: 2026-10-23
Received: 2025-07-20
Revision Accepted: 2026-01-04
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 0
Clicked: 2040