
Sheng DING, Jing LI, Minglong YANG, Yujia SONG, Xiangke NIU, Mei LI, Yao LUO. DNA-based one-pot rapid biosensing platform integrating turn-back loop primer-accelerated LAMP and Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute for meat visual authentication[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2026, 27(7): 775-787.
@article{title="DNA-based one-pot rapid biosensing platform integrating turn-back loop primer-accelerated LAMP and Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute for meat visual authentication",
author="Sheng DING, Jing LI, Minglong YANG, Yujia SONG, Xiangke NIU, Mei LI, Yao LUO",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="27",
number="7",
pages="775-787",
year="2026",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B2500745"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T DNA-based one-pot rapid biosensing platform integrating turn-back loop primer-accelerated LAMP and Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute for meat visual authentication
%A Sheng DING
%A Jing LI
%A Minglong YANG
%A Yujia SONG
%A Xiangke NIU
%A Mei LI
%A Yao LUO
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 27
%N 7
%P 775-787
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2026
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B2500745
TY - JOUR
T1 - DNA-based one-pot rapid biosensing platform integrating turn-back loop primer-accelerated LAMP and Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute for meat visual authentication
A1 - Sheng DING
A1 - Jing LI
A1 - Minglong YANG
A1 - Yujia SONG
A1 - Xiangke NIU
A1 - Mei LI
A1 - Yao LUO
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 27
IS - 7
SP - 775
EP - 787
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2026
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B2500745
Abstract: Meat adulteration is a significant global food safety challenge, creating a pressing need for rapid and on-site detection technologies. Herein, we present an intelligent one-pot biosensing platform termed one-pot TLAMP-PfAgo assay (OTPA) that integrates the rapid amplification of turn-back loop primer-accelerated loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) (TLAMP) with the sequence-specific detection of Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute (PfAgo). This system features a clever heat-activatable design using microcrystalline wax to spatially separate reactions within a single tube, enabling contamination-free and streamlined operation. The OTPA assay achieves sensitive and specific detection, with limits of detection as low as 3×10-4 ng/μL for pork DNA and 2×10-4 ng/μL for beef DNA within 30 min. It successfully enables duplex target identification and has been validated with commercial meat products, showing perfect concordance with standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based qualitative detection. Notably, the result can be directly visualized under blue light, underscoring the substantial potential of this cost-effective and simple platform for point-of-care testing (POCT) and intelligent biosensing in food safety surveillance.
[1]AdenugaBM, MontowskaM, 2023. A systematic review of DNA-based methods in authentication of game and less common meat species. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 22(3):2112-2160.
[2]AgnoliL, CapitelloR, de SalvoM, et al., 2016. Food fraud and consumers’ choices in the wake of the horsemeat scandal. Br Food J, 118(8):1898-1913.
[3]ChaudharyV, KajlaP, DewanA, et al., 2022. Spectroscopic techniques for authentication of animal origin foods. Front Nutr, 9:979205.
[4]DaiYF, WuYF, LiuGZ, et al., 2020. CRISPR mediated biosensing toward understanding cellular biology and point-of-care diagnosis. Angew Chem Int Ed, 59(47):20754-20766.
[5]FajardoV, GonzálezI, RojasM, et al., 2010. A review of current PCR-based methodologies for the authentication of meats from game animal species. Trends Food Sci Technol, 21(8):408-421.
[6]FangX, ZhangWY, SuHH, et al., 2025. A LAMP-based colorimetric and fluorescence dual-channel assay for on-site identification of adulterated meat by a portable device. Food Control, 169:110984.
[7]HeHJ, da Silva FerreiraMV, WuQY, et al., 2024. Portable and miniature sensors in supply chain for food authentication: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 65(20):3966-3986.
[8]JiangH, LiY, LvXF, et al., 2023. Recent advances in cascade isothermal amplification techniques for ultra-sensitive nucleic acid detection. Talanta, 260:124645.
[9]JiangYS, BhadraS, LiBL, et al., 2015. Robust strand exchange reactions for the sequence-specific, real-time detection of nucleic acid amplicons. Anal Chem, 87(6):3314-3320.
[10]KamruzzamanM, MakinoY, OshitaS, 2015. Non-invasive analytical technology for the detection of contamination, adulteration, and authenticity of meat, poultry, and fish: a review. Anal Chim Acta, 853:19-29.
[11]LiXM, ZangMW, LiD, et al., 2023. Meat food fraud risk in Chinese markets 2012‒2021. npj Sci Food, 7:12.
[12]LiYR, KouJ, HanX, et al., 2023. Argonaute-triggered visual and rebuilding-free foodborne pathogenic bacteria detection. J Hazard Mater, 454:131485.
[13]LiYR, ZhaoL, WangJL, et al., 2024. Argonaute-based nucleic acid detection technology: advantages, current status, challenges, and perspectives. ACS Sens, 9(11):5665-5682.
[14]LianouA, PapakonstantinouM, NychasGJE, et al., 2021. Fraud in meat and poultry products. In: Hellberg RS, Everstine K, Sklare SA (Eds.), Food Fraud: A Global Threat with Public Health and Economic Consequences. Academic Press, Amsterdam, p.85-108.
[15]LiuQ, GuoX, XunGH, et al., 2021. Argonaute integrated single-tube PCR system enables supersensitive detection of rare mutations. Nucleic Acids Res, 49(13):e75-e75.
[16]MartineauRL, MurraySA, CiS, et al., 2017. Improved performance of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays via swarm priming. Anal Chem, 89(1):625-632.
[17]MontowskaM, PospiechE, 2010. Authenticity determination of meat and meat products on the protein and DNA basis. Food Rev Int, 27(1):84-100.
[18]Muflihah, HardiantoA, KusumaningtyasP, et al., 2023. DNA-based detection of pork content in food. Heliyon, 9(3):e14418.
[19]Müller-MaatschJ, van RuthSM, 2021. Handheld devices for food authentication and their applications: a review. Foods, 10(12):2901.
[20]PerestamAT, FujisakiKK, NavaO, et al., 2017. Comparison of real-time PCR and ELISA-based methods for the detection of beef and pork in processed meat products. Food Control, 71:346-352.
[21]QuC, LiYZ, DuSS, et al., 2022. Raman spectroscopy for rapid fingerprint analysis of meat quality and security: principles, progress and prospects. Food Res Int, 161:111805.
[22]RobsonK, DeanM, BrooksS, et al., 2020. A 20-year analysis of reported food fraud in the global beef supply chain. Food Control, 116:107310.
[23]SheuSC, TsouPC, LienYY, et al., 2018. Development of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays for the rapid detection of allergic peanut in processed food. Food Chem, 257:67-74.
[24]ShiJY, DingS, LiC, et al., 2024. Ultrafast DNA detection based on turn-back loop primer-accelerated LAMP (TLAMP). Anal Chim Acta, 1321:343041.
[25]SofosJN, 2008. Challenges to meat safety in the 21st century. Meat Sci, 78(1-2):3-13.
[26]StachniukA, SumaraA, MontowskaM, et al., 2021. Liquid chromatography‒mass spectrometry bottom-up proteomic methods in animal species analysis of processed meat for food authentication and the detection of adulterations. Mass Spectrom Rev, 40(1):3-30.
[27]SuFL, ZhaoWT, ZhaoFR, et al., 2025. Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute-based fluorometric biosensor for one-tube detection of cancer-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms in microRNAs. Anal Chem, 97(8):4678-4686.
[28]TianT, ZhouXM, 2023. CRISPR-based biosensing strategies: technical development and application prospects. Annu Rev Anal Chem, 16:311-332.
[29]VlachosA, ArvanitoyannisIS, TserkezouP, 2016. An updated review of meat authenticity methods and applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 56(7):1061-1096.
[30]YangLX, FuSJ, PengXK, et al., 2014. Identification of pork in meat products using real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip, 28(5):882-888.
[31]YangN, ZhangH, HanX, et al., 2024. Advancements and applications of loop-mediated isothermal amplification technology: a comprehensive overview. Front Microbiol, 15:1406632.
[32]YangZR, MaoSY, WangL, et al., 2023. CRISPR/Cas and Argonaute-based biosensors for pathogen detection. ACS Sens, 8(10):3623-3642.
CLC number:
On-line Access: 2026-07-29
Received: 2025-11-18
Revision Accepted: 2026-02-17
Crosschecked: 2026-07-29
Cited: 0
Clicked: 1314
Citations: Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-951X
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>