CLC number: TP242
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2008-11-04
Cited: 9
Clicked: 7446
Wei WANG, Hua-yong YANG, Jun ZOU, Xiao-dong RUAN, Xin FU. Optimal design of Stewart platforms based on expanding the control bandwidth while considering the hydraulic system design[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2009, 10(1): 22-30.
@article{title="Optimal design of Stewart platforms based on expanding the control bandwidth while considering the hydraulic system design",
author="Wei WANG, Hua-yong YANG, Jun ZOU, Xiao-dong RUAN, Xin FU",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="10",
number="1",
pages="22-30",
year="2009",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A0820329"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Optimal design of Stewart platforms based on expanding the control bandwidth while considering the hydraulic system design
%A Wei WANG
%A Hua-yong YANG
%A Jun ZOU
%A Xiao-dong RUAN
%A Xin FU
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 10
%N 1
%P 22-30
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2009
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A0820329
TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal design of Stewart platforms based on expanding the control bandwidth while considering the hydraulic system design
A1 - Wei WANG
A1 - Hua-yong YANG
A1 - Jun ZOU
A1 - Xiao-dong RUAN
A1 - Xin FU
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 10
IS - 1
SP - 22
EP - 30
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2009
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A0820329
Abstract: We proposed an optimal design method to expand the bandwidth for the control of large hydraulic Stewart platform. The method is based on generalized natural frequency and takes hydraulic oil into consideration. A Lagrangian formulation which considers the whole leg inertia is presented to obtain the accurate equivalent mass matrix. Using the model, the effect of leg inertia and the influence of design parameters on the generalized natural frequency are investigated. Finally, numerical examples are presented to validate and confirm the efficiency of the mathematical model. The results show that the leg inertia, especially the piston part plays an important role in the dynamics. The optimum diameter ratio of the base to the moving platform is between 2 and 3, and the optimum joint angle ratio of the base to the moving platform is about 1. The smaller joint angles and a longer leg stroke are favorable for raising system frequencies. The system oil should be preprocessed for large platforms with a requirement for good dynamic performance.
[1] Arsenault, M., Boudreau, R., 2006. Synthesis of planar parallel mechanisms while considering workspace, dexterity, stiffness and singularity avoidance. Journal of Mechanical Design, 128(1):69-78.
[2] Bhattacharya, S., Hatwal, H., Ghosh, A., 1995. On the optimum design of Stewart platform type parallel manipulators. Robotica, 13(2):133-140.
[3] Gao, F., Guy, F., Gruver, W.A., 1997. Criteria Based Analysis and Design of Three-degree-of-freedom Planar Robotic Manipulators. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Mexico, 1(468-473).
[4] Gosselin, C., Angeles, J., 1991. A global performance index for the kinematic optimization of robotic manipulators. Journal of Mechanical Design, 113(3):220-226.
[5] Gough, V.E., 1956~1957. Contribution to discussion of papers on research in automobile stability, control and tyre performance. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Auto Division, 171:392-395.
[6] Hao, F., Merlet, J.P., 2005. Multi-criteria optimal design of parallel manipulators based on interval analysis. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 40(2):157-171.
[7] Hunt, K.H., 1978. Kinematic Geometry of Mechanisms. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[8] Jin, Y.L, Gong, G.F., Wang, J., 2007. Design and simulation study of a vacuum-pumping deaerating device for hydraulic oil. Machine tool & hydraulics, 35(7):77-79 (in Chinese).
[9] Khatib, O., Bowling, A., 1996. Optimization of the Inertial and Acceleration Characteristics of Manipulators. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minnesota, 4(2883-2889).
[10] Kumar, V., 1992. Characterization of workspaces of parallel manipulators. Journal of Mechanical Design, 114(3):368-375.
[11] Lebret, G., Liu, K., Lewis, F.L., 1993. Dynamic analysis and control of a Stewart platform Manipulator. Journal of Robotic Systems, 10(5):629-655.
[12] Lou, Y.J., Liu, G.F., Li, Z.X., 2003. Optimal Design of Parallel Manipulators via LMI Approach. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, 2(1869-1874).
[13] Merlet, J.P., 2002. Still a Long Way to Go on the Road for Parallel Mechanisms. ASME DETC Conference, Montréal, Canada.
[14] Miller, K., 2004. Optimal design and modeling of spatial parallel manipulators. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 23(2):127-140.
[15] Pang, H., Shahinpoor, M., 1994. Inverse dynamics of a parallel manipulator. Journal of Robotic Systems, 11(8):693-702.
[16] Pittens, K.H., Podhorodeski, R.P., 1993. A family of Stewart platforms with optimal dexterity. Journal of Robotic Systems, 10(4):463-479.
[17] Ryu, J., Cha, J., 2001. Optimal Architecture Design of Parallel Manipulators for Best Accuracy. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Systems, Hawaii, 3(1281-1286).
[18] Shiller, Z., Sundar, S., 1991. Design of Robotic Manipulators for Optimal Dynamic Performance. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, 1(334-339).
[19] Smaili, A.A., Diab, N.A., Atallah, N.A., 2005. Optimum synthesis of mechanisms using tabu-gradient search algorithm. Journal of Mechanical Design, 127(5):917-923.
[20] Wang, H.R., 2001. Research for Motion and Force Control of Hydraulic 6-DOF Parallel Manipulator. Hebei University Press, Baoding, China (in Chinese).
[21] Zhang, D., Gosselin, C.M., 2002. Parallel kinematic machine design with kinetostatic model. Robotica, 20(4):429-438.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>