CLC number: U491.2
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2011-07-14
Cited: 11
Clicked: 7275
Sheng Jin, Zhi-yi Huang, Peng-fei Tao, Dian-hai Wang. Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow using time-to-collision[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2011, 12(8): 645-654.
@article{title="Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow using time-to-collision",
author="Sheng Jin, Zhi-yi Huang, Peng-fei Tao, Dian-hai Wang",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="12",
number="8",
pages="645-654",
year="2011",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A1000518"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow using time-to-collision
%A Sheng Jin
%A Zhi-yi Huang
%A Peng-fei Tao
%A Dian-hai Wang
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 12
%N 8
%P 645-654
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2011
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1000518
TY - JOUR
T1 - Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow using time-to-collision
A1 - Sheng Jin
A1 - Zhi-yi Huang
A1 - Peng-fei Tao
A1 - Dian-hai Wang
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 12
IS - 8
SP - 645
EP - 654
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2011
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A1000518
Abstract: The conventional car-following theory is based on the assumption that vehicles will travel along the center line of lanes. However, according to the field survey data, in complex traffic conditions, a lateral separation between the leader and the follower frequently occurs. Accordingly, by taking lateral separation into account, we redefined the equation of time-to-collision (TTC) using visual angle information. Based on the stimulus-response framework, TTC was introduced into the basic General Motors (GM) model as a stimulus, and a non-lane-based car-following model of steady-state traffic flow was developed. The property of flow-density relationship was further investigated after integrating the proposed car-following model with different parameters. The results imply that the property of steady-state traffic flow and the capacity of each lane are highly relevant to the microscopic staggered car-following behavior, and the proposed model significantly enhances the practicality of the human driving behavior model.
[1]Bando, M., Hasabe, K., Nakayama, A., Shibata, A., Sugiyama, Y., 1995. Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Physical Review E, 51(2):1035-1042.
[2]Batista, M., Twrdyo, E., 2010. Optimal velocity functions for car-following models. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics and Engineering), 11(7):520-529.
[3]Bootsma, R.J., Oudejans, R.R., 1993. Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19(5):1041-1052.
[4]Brackstone, M., McDonald, M., 1999. Car-following: a historical review. Transportation Research Part F, 2(4):181-196.
[5]Chowdhury, D., Santen, L., Schads, A., 2000. Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems. Physics Reports, 329(4-6):199-329.
[6]Edie, L.C., 1961. Car-following and steady state theory for non-congested traffic. Operations Research, 9(1):66-76.
[7]Fukui, M., Ishibashi, Y., 1996. Traffic flow in 1D cellular automaton model including cars moving with high speed. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 65(6):1868-1870 (in Japanese).
[8]Gazis, D.C., Herman, R., Potts, R.B., 1959. Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow. Operations Research, 7(4):499-505.
[9]Gazis, D.C., Herman, R., Rothery, R.W., 1961. Follow-the-leader models of traffic flow. Operations Research, 9(4):545-567.
[10]Gipps, P.G., 1981. A behavioral car-following model for computer-simulation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 15(2):105-111.
[11]Greenberg, H., 1959. An analysis of traffic flow. Operations Research, 7(1):255-275.
[12]Greenshields, B.D., 1935. A Study of Traffic Capacity. Proceedings of the Highway Research Board, 14:468.
[13]Gunay, B., 2007. Car following theory with lateral discomfort. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41(7):722-735.
[14]Jin, S., Wang, D.H., Tao, P.F., Li, P.F., 2010. Non-lane-based full velocity difference car following model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 389(21):4654-4662.
[15]Jin, S., Wang, D.H., Huang, Z.Y., Tao, P.F., 2011. Visual angle model for car-following theory. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 390(11):1931-1940.
[16]Kikuchi, C., Chakroborty, P., 1992. Car following model based on a fuzzy inference system. Transportation Research Record, 1365:82-91.
[17]Lee, D.N., 1976. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time to collision. Perception, 5(4):437-459.
[18]Li, L., Shi, P., 2006. Numerical analysis on car-following traffic flow models with delay time. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 7(2):204-209.
[19]Luo, L.H., Liu, H., Li, P., Wang, H., 2010. Model predictive control for adaptive cruise control with multi-objectives: comfort, fuel-economy, safety and car-following. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics and Engineering), 11(3):191-201.
[20]Mathew, T.V., Radhakrishnan, P., 2010. Calibration of microsimulation models for nonlane-based heterogeneous traffic at signalized intersections. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136(1):59-66.
[21]Michaels, R.M., 1963. Perceptual Factors in Car Following. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow, OECD, Paris.
[22]Nagel, K., Schreckenberg, M., 1992. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. Journal de Physique I, 2(12):2221-2229.
[23]Newell, G.F., 1961. Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following. Operations Research, 9(2):209-229.
[24]Rakha, H., Arafeh, M., 2010. Calibrating steady-state traffic stream and car-following models using loop detector data. Transportation Science, 44(2):151-168.
[25]Schiff, W., Detwiler, M.L., 1979. Information used in judging impending collision. Perception, 8(6):647-658.
[26]Toledo, T., 2007. Driving behavior: models and challenges. Transport Reviews, 27(1):65-84.
[27]Tordeux, A., Lassarre, S., Roussignol, M., 2010. An adaptive time gap car following model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(8-9):1115-1131.
[28]Transportation Research Board, 2001. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000). Federal Highway Administration.
[29]Treiber, M., Helbing, D., 2003. Memory effects in microscopic traffic models and wide scattering in flow-density data. Physical Review E, 68(4):6119-6126.
[30]Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., Helbing, D., 2000. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Physical Review E, 62(2):1805-1824.
[31]Van der Horst, A.R.A., 1990. A Time-Based Analysis of Road User Behavior in Normal and Critical Encounters. PhD Thesis, Institute for Perception TNO, Soesterberg, the Netherlands.
[32]Van Winsum, W., 1999. The human element in car following models. Transportation Research Part F, 2(4):207-211.
[33]Van Winsum, W., Heino, A., 1996. Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking. Ergonomics, 39(4):579-592.
[34]Van Winsum, W., Brouwer, W., 1997. Time headway in car following and operational performance during unexpected braking. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84(3):1247-1257.
[35]Weng, Y., Wu, T., 2002. Car following models of vehicular traffic. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 3(4):412-417.
[36]Wiedemann, R., 1974. Simulation des Straß Enverkehrsflusses Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Verkehrswesen der Universität Karlsruhe (in German).
[37]Wu, J.P., Brackstone, M., McDonald, M., 2000. Fuzzy sets and systems for a motorway microscopic simulation model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 116(1):65-76.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>