Similar articles

Abstract: A 3D multi-time scale discrete element method-computational fluid dynamic (DEM-CFD) coupling approach was applied to investigate the filtration of micron-sized particles by different types of fiber arrays. Both the pressure drop and the filtration efficiency were examined to indicate the filtration performance of the fiber arrays. Fibers that were uniformly arrayed in a parallel or staggered manner were compared. Results showed that the staggered array showed a better performance than the parallel array in terms of both pressure drop and filtration efficiency. Further, we compared the performance of different staggered arrays, i.e. a regular case, one densified in the front layers and another densified in the back layers. The front densified array was found to enter the clogging and cake filtration stage in the shortest time, leading to the highest filtration efficiency, but the highest pressure drop. The back densified array still achieved a much higher filtration efficiency, despite a much lower pressure drop comparable to that of the regular array. The results suggest that the two kinds of densified arrays may be suited for different purposes, e.g. baghouse filters or breathing masks.

离散元-计算流体动力学耦合方法模拟多纤维阵列过滤微米级颗粒

[1]Benyahia S, Syamlal M, O’Brien TJ, 2006. Extension of Hill–Koch–Ladd drag correlation over all ranges of Reynolds number and solids volume fraction. Powder Technology, 162(2):166-174.

[2]Chen S, Li S, Yang M, 2015. Sticking/Rebound criterion for collisions of small adhesive particles: effects of impact parameter and particle size. Powder Technology, 274: 431-440.

[3]Chen S, Liu W, Li S, 2016a. Effect of long-range electrostatic repulsion on pore clogging during microfiltration. Physical Review E, 94(6):063108.

[4]Chen S, Li S, Liu W, et al., 2016b. Effect of long-range repulsive coulomb interactions on packing structure of adhesive particles. Soft Matter, 12(6):1836-1846.

[5]Dittler A, Gutmann B, Lichtenberger R, et al., 1998. Optical in situ measurement of dust cake thickness distributions on rigid filter media for gas cleaning. Powder Technology, 99(2):177-184.

[6]Dunnett SJ, Clement CF, 2006. A numerical study of the effects of loading from diffusive deposition on the efficiency of fibrous filters. Journal of Aerosol Science, 37(9):1116-1139.

[7]Dunnett SJ, Clement CF, 2012. Numerical investigation into the loading behaviour of filters operating in the diffusional and interception deposition regimes. Journal of Aerosol Science, 53:85-99.

[8]Flagan CR, Seinfel HJ, 1988. Fundamentals of Air Pollution Engineering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, p.433-455.

[9]Garg R, Galvin J, Li T, et al., 2012. Open-source MFIX-DEM software for gas–solids flows: part I—verification studies. Powder Technology, 220:122-137.

[10]Hosseini SA, Tafreshi HV, 2010. 3-D simulation of particle filtration in electrospun nanofibrous filters. Powder Technology, 201(2):153-160.

[11]Johnson KL, Kendall K, Roberts AD, 1971. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proceedings of Royal Society London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 324(1558):301-313.

[12]Kanaoka C, Emi H, Myojo T, 1980. Simulation of the growing process of a particle dendrite and evaluation of a single fiber collection efficiency with dust load. Journal of Aerosol Science, 11(4):383-385.

[13]Karadimos A, Ocone R, 2003. The effect of the flow field recalculation on fibrous filter loading: a numerical simulation. Powder Technology, 137(3):109-119.

[14]Kasper G, Schollmeier S, Meyer J, et al., 2009. The collection efficiency of a particle-loaded single filter fiber. Journal of Aerosol Science, 40(12):993-1009.

[15]Kasper G, Schollmeier S, Meyer J, 2010. Structure and density of deposits formed on filter fibers by inertial particle deposition and bounce. Journal of Aerosol Science, 41(12):1167-1182.

[16]Kolakaluri R, Murphy E, Subramaniam S, et al., 2015. Filtration model for polydisperse aerosols in gas-solid flow using granule-resolved direct numerical simulation. AIChE Journal, 61(11):3594-3606.

[17]LaMarche CQ, Miller AW, Liu P, et al., 2016. Linking micro-scale predictions of capillary forces to macro-scale fluidization experiments in humid environments. AIChE Journal, 62(10):3585-3597.

[18]Li SQ, Marshall JS, 2007. Discrete element simulation of micro-particle deposition on a cylindrical fiber in an array. Journal of Aerosol Science, 38(10):1031-1046.

[19]Li SQ, Marshall JS, Liu GQ, et al., 2011. Adhesive particulate flow: the discrete-element method and its application in energy and environmental engineering. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 37(6):633-668.

[20]Li T, Garg R, Galvin J, et al., 2012. Open-source MFIX-DEM software for gas-solids flows: part II—validation studies. Powder Technology, 220:138-150.

[21]Liu D, van Wachem BGM, Mudde RF, et al., 2016. An adhesive CFD-DEM model for simulating nanoparticle agglomerate fluidization. AIChE Journal, 62(7):2259-2270.

[22]Liu W, Li S, Baule A, et al., 2015. Adhesive loose packings of small dry particles. Soft Matter, 11(32):6492-6498.

[23]Liu ZG, Wang PK, 1997. Pressure drop and interception efficiency of multifiber filters. Aerosol Science and Technology, 26(4):313-325.

[24]Luding S, 2008. Cohesive, frictional powders: contact models for tension. Granular Matter, 10(4):235-246.

[25]Marshall JS, 2009. Discrete-element modeling of particulate aerosol flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 228(5):1541-1561.

[26]Marshall JS, Li S, 2014. Adhesive Particle Flow. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, p.86-99.

[27]Maze B, Vahedi Tafreshi H, Wang Q, et al., 2007. A simulation of unsteady-state filtration via nanofiber media at reduced operating pressures. Journal of Aerosol Science, 38(5):550-571.

[28]Myojo T, Kanaoka C, Emi H, 1984. Experimental observation of collection efficiency of a dust-loaded fiber. Journal of Aerosol Science, 15(4):483-489.

[29]Novick VJ, Higgins PJ, Dierkschiede B, et al., 1990. Efficiency and mass loading characteristics of a typical HEPA filter media material. Proceedings of the 21st DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning Conference, 2:782-798.

[30]Roussel N, Nguyen TLH, Coussot P, 2007. General probabilistic approach to the filtration process. Physical Review Letters, 98(11):114502.

[31]Schiller S, Schmid H, 2015. Highly efficient filtration of ultrafine dust in baghouse filters using precoat materials. Powder Technology, 279:96-105.

[32]Tamadondar MR, Rasmuson A, Thalberg K, et al., 2017. Numerical modeling of adhesive particle mixing. AIChE Journal, 63(7):2599-2609.

[33]Thomas D, Contal P, Renaudin V, et al., 1999. Modelling pressure drop in HEPA filters during dynamic filtration. Journal of Aerosol Science, 30(2):235-246.

[34]Thomas D, Penicot P, Contal P, et al., 2001. Clogging of fibrous filters by solid aerosol particles: experimental and modelling study. Chemical Engineering Science, 56(11):3549-3561.

[35]Tien C, Teoh SK, Tan RBH, 2001. Cake filtration analysis— the effect of the relationship between the pore liquid pressure and the cake compressive stress. Chemical Engineering Science, 56(18):5361-5369.

[36]Tomas J, 2007. Adhesion of ultrafine particles—a micromechanical approach. Chemical Engineering Science, 62(7):1997-2010.

[37]Wang H, Zhao H, Guo Z, et al., 2013. Lattice Boltzmann method for simulations of gas-particle flows over a backward-facing step. Journal of Computational Physics, 239:57-71.

[38]Wang J, Pui DYH, 2009. Filtration of aerosol particles by elliptical fibers: a numerical study. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(1):185-196.

[39]Yang M, Li S, Yao Q, 2013. Mechanistic studies of initial deposition of fine adhesive particles on a fiber using discrete-element methods. Powder Technology, 248:44-53.

[40]Zhu HP, Zhou ZY, Yang RY, et al., 2008. Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: a review of major applications and findings. Chemical Engineering Science, 63(23):5728-5770.